Guest guest Posted June 15, 1999 Report Share Posted June 15, 1999 [...] > > So, this is the wrong message. To list someone as an advanced devotee is > understandable. But why list them as "gurus"? What is the relevance? > What is the value of this approach? And more important: Has anyone > considered the hazards of this approach? [...] Just as they get criticized as gurus, so they get advertised as gurus. The two sides of the same coin -- the institutionalized guru-post. ys mnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 1999 Report Share Posted June 15, 1999 "COM: Mahanidhi (das) (S)" wrote: > [Text 2406865 from COM] > > [...] > > > > So, this is the wrong message. To list someone as an advanced devotee is > > understandable. But why list them as "gurus"? What is the relevance? > > What is the value of this approach? And more important: Has anyone > > considered the hazards of this approach? > [...] > > Just as they get criticized as gurus, so they get advertised as gurus. > The two sides of the same coin -- the institutionalized guru-post. > > ys mnd hkdd: Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.