To BE - or not to BE.............where or whatever?

[Guest guest]

> ISKCON has got problems.

> As the catholics, protestans had(has).

> If you want to help, why don't you do it "in" ISCKON?

 

Well, you know, I think one can well be "in" and OUT, or "out" and IN

or maybe also simultaniously "in and out" and be "ABOVE" in order to be IN.

Depending how you look at it I guess,..in order to BE - or not to BE "in" or

"out", or where or what or whatever, isn,t it so..?

 

Or "what" do you think about "in" and "out" or maybe "above"...? What could

that mean...?

 

Any-one "out" there from "in" or "out"side or maybe from ABOVE who can

disclose this great mystery about "in" and "out" or maybe above "in" and

"out"...or what...or where...or whatever, to BE - or not to BE - in ISKCON?

 

....than you are in any case "above", I guess, or IN, or wherever, or anyway?

 

Or maybe everything is ONE in "in" and "out", than one could well be OUT .

or completely "down", I guess, or "up" in "out"er space in "in" OR "out",

for than it,s better to get "up" again, about "in" or "out" in order to be

IN and not OUT, or what, or whatever, or wherever....... or what do you

think about "in" or "out" venerable vaishnavas?

 

When are you "in" or "out" or maybe ABOVE BEying IN or OUT ...or wherever in

ISKCON?

 

 

Ys,

Harsi-Krsna,s-liberal-ism-dasa dasa anudasa-das.