Guest guest Posted July 9, 1999 Report Share Posted July 9, 1999 On 07 Jul 1999, Srila Dasa wrote: > But have you thoroughly examined his writings > and that of ALL the Gaudiya Mathas (they all concur on this "fall of the jiva" > point) to get a sufficient background for making a sound judgment? From your > highly dismissive statements I think you are not even justified in coming to > ANY CONCLUSIONS. Prabhuji, I find it ironic that you say the above while still upholding Payonidhi prabhu as a terrific example of how someone saw the light, accepted a shiksha guru guide, etc. In particular, Payonidhi prabhu has _explicitly_ stated on the Krishna-Katha conference that he believes that the jIva has fallen. He said this _after_ "accepting" Narayana Maharaja as a shiksha guru. What kind of shiksha is this, that he feels fit to reject whenever he wants to? Are you _sure_ that you want to uphold him as an example for the rest of us to follow? If so, then I guess we can all get cool new names from the latest travelling sannyasi and make some big show of having a shiksha guru while completely rejecting our claimed guru's teachings on whichever issues we desire. Not the guru-disciple relationship I've read about in the _Nectar of Devotion_; what about you? Yours, Vijay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.