Answer to Allegations Made Against H.H. Narayana Maharaja

[Guest guest]

>>

As for the disciples of other gurus, there were many instances when devotees

asked

their diksa-guru for permission to take siksa from or simply association of

NM or

other advanced senior vaisnavas, and the diksa-guru said "no" without giving

any proper philosophical explanation. In such a case, as stated in Jaiva

Dharma, the disciple may reject his diksa guru and take shelter of that

advanced

vaisnava because his diksa guru is envious of the vaisnavas and has the

false ego.

So the devotees did it and NM had to give them shelter. Why should he be

blamed for that?>>

 

Isn't that a convenient explanation. Poor gurus; damned if they do and damned

if they don't. There are GBC resolutions against associating with NM. Are you

suggesting that ISKCON gurus disobey the GBC (thus directly disobeying Srila

Prabhupada's order)? And if the follow the GBC and tell their disciples *not*

to associate with NM, then the NM camp considers it OK for them to reject

their gurus and take shelter of NM. How clever. If it wasn't so sad, it would

be funny.

 

Ys,

Madhusudani dasi