Guest guest Posted December 11, 1999 Report Share Posted December 11, 1999 > Generally speaking, if women who aren't "that shy" are managing not only > other women but men as well, then we can expect degradation, can't we? > Not necessarily. If they are Krishna concsious, they can manage and inspire others, but they will not have that same kind of shyness that vedic ladies have. The best would be that men who are more qualified really exists, so that would solve the problem. > Now, my question to you, Mataji, is, Will you propagate *that* teaching of > your spiritual master as the overriding *rule* for all [meaning > "practically 99.9% of" all] women? > You see, all this what I write here are my personal realisations, and have nothing to do with my spiritual master. I am not propagating anything as a overriding rule (that's what GHQ people are doing). I am just trying to explain that the kind of ladies you got in the west is not exactly "vedic". But they can be pure devotees and do devotional service even if they are not that shy and vedic. The qualification for attaining love of God is laulyam (intense eagerness) and not shyness or chastity. Ys. Sraddha dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.