Guest guest Posted July 23, 1999 Report Share Posted July 23, 1999 > Our sannysis and gurus ALL know that Srila Prabhupada gave the orders to > divide this society of devotees into four varnas and yet they have failed > completely to even BEGIN this endeavor for over 25 years. There is not > even ONE varnasrama college in the movement in the mode of operation as > described by Srila Prabhupada in his March 1974 varnasrama- morning walk > conversations. He ordered that varnasrama colleges be started IMMEDIATELY > in EVERY center of the movement. > > Why haven't these "very, very sincere" leaders done this? OK , I will begin the process . You will be a sudra . You are assigned to assist in Flame Wars . Because you are the only sincere person who has ever done anything worthwhile in the last 25 years you should be good at this . But first you have to find a brahmin you can work for . Good luck , given your propensity for vituperation . Also I don't agree with you . There have been many discussions , seminars and even attempts at establishing parts of varnasrama . Many papers have been written and even a couple of books . It is not an easy subject . Srila Bhaktisiddhanta wanted very much to do it . He was in India working with Indians who are much more familiar with this . He was active for at least 30 years and had complete control of his mission . Srila Prabhupada had 12 years . He described varnasrama as one of his missions . We are being heavily attacked from so many sides at this time and we are trying to keep Srila Prabhupada's mission together so someday we may have a varnasrama college and a Mayapur Project etc etc . We get very little encouragement and WHO WANTS THE JOB ANYWAY !!!! Many GBC men , sannyasis , temple presidents have put their lives on the line working long hours with no budget and you sit at your little home in Syracuse in front of your computer firing off your 2 cents worth attacking everyone . I for one don't appreciate it much . I think you will find a positive approach would work better . That said , I apologize if my text has been offensive to you or others . I would like to submit , although unbelievable to some , that we are sensitive people also . Enough leader bashing , please . Your servant Sridhar Swami Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 1999 Report Share Posted July 24, 1999 > > Our sannysis and gurus ALL know that Srila Prabhupada gave the orders to > > divide this society of devotees into four varnas and yet they have > > failed completely to even BEGIN this endeavor for over 25 years. There > > is not even ONE varnasrama college in the movement in the mode of > > operation as described by Srila Prabhupada in his March 1974 varnasrama- > > morning walk conversations. He ordered that varnasrama colleges be > > started IMMEDIATELY in EVERY center of the movement. > > > > Why haven't these "very, very sincere" leaders done this? > > OK , I will begin the process . You will be a sudra . You are assigned to > assist in Flame Wars . Because you are the only sincere person who has > ever done anything worthwhile in the last 25 years you should be good at > this . But first you have to find a brahmin you can work for . Good luck , > given your propensity for vituperation . Ahhhh, the sweet sound of a swami. It's always refreshing! Catch you on a bad day Maharaja? I'm a little surprised at your reaction to my rather tame comments. This was nothing compared to some previous debates with other swamis and godbrothers. One reason I would suggest we have not been very successful at implementing daiva varnasrama-dharma is the propensity for "leaders" or others like yourself to think that someone is going to dole out the designations and order someone to be a sudra and assist in "flame wars" or the like. we first have to RECOGNIZE that varnasrama-dharma already exists; it is eternal, created by Krsna - catur-varnyam... .To think we have to come to some level of "purity" before we are qualified to implement it practicably in our lives is denying our constitutional nature for some artificial alternative social system. > Also I don't agree with you . There have been many discussions , seminars > and even attempts at establishing parts of varnasrama . Many papers have > been written and even a couple of books . It is not an easy subject . Take baby steps first. You have to crawl before you can run. Varnasrama-dharma is a very, very comprehensive system of social and spiritual human culture without doubt. It is like the mathematical systems which are very comprehensive and have very high levels of practice and logic. But anyone, even a child, can be a practitioner of the mathematical system simply by learning the 1+1=2 equation which is true in even the highest math. Just because we do not know the highest levels of varnasrama-dharma practice shouldn't stop us completely from endeavoring to BEGIN the process as directed practically by Srila Prabhupada. Do you think Srila Prabhupada had the wrong idea in March of 1974 when he gave detailed instructions of how to start varnasrama-dharma implementation within this society? How many of those instructions have been implemented in ISKCON? This is not to condemn everything else that has been done, but certainly it should have received at least equal priority in budgeting and man-power. Don't you think? > Srila Bhaktisiddhanta wanted very much to do it . He was in India working > with Indians who are much more familiar with this . He was active for at > least 30 years and had complete control of his mission . Srila Prabhupada > had 12 years . He described varnasrama as one of his missions . He described it as wholely a HALF of his mission and the one thing that he lamented having not fulfilled, leaving it to us. > We are being heavily attacked from so many sides at this time and we are > trying to keep Srila Prabhupada's mission together Varnasrama-dharma, the medicine for the disease that ails us, would make things a lot easier to manage, Prabhu. We will endlessly fight the symptoms with no real success. "Society cannot depend on sudras. Nor can you depend on the brahmanas. To fulfill the necessities of your body, there must be a brain, arms, a stomach, and legs. The legs, the brain, and the arms are all required for cooperation to fulfill the mission of the whole body. So in any society you can see that unless there are these divisions, there will be chaos. IT WILL NOT WORK PROPERLY. IT WILL BE MAYA AND THERE WILL BE DISTURBANCES." SSR pg 198 > so someday we may have > a varnasrama college and a Mayapur Project etc etc . Why always so big, big, big? We dream of huge things, never attain them, and the "small" fundamentals get left behind. Start with small varnasrama colleges in EVERY center just like Srila Prabhupada advised. Little counseling rooms where EVERY devotee can receive varnasrama-dharma guidance EVERYDAY in EVERY center. This is what Srila Prabhupada suggested. Do-able stuff. Do-able right now. > We get very little > encouragement and WHO WANTS THE JOB ANYWAY !!!! I am sorry, I find it hard to encourage leaders to continue on a path which has diverged from the fundamental plans and advice of our guru maharaja. You are fighting fires and that is unfortunately necessary and commendable for a few, but the majority of the brahmanas should be detached from that and stay focused on their duty of training all the four classes in varna occupations. This will be productive and auspicious. > Many GBC men , sannyasis > , temple presidents have put their lives on the line working long hours > with no budget and you sit at your little home in Syracuse in front of > your computer firing off your 2 cents worth attacking everyone . This is like President Clinton complaining about how his administration is working sooooo hard all the time on executive matters and government problems when he seems to forget that it is his method of administration that causes all the problems that he is soooo busy fighting! You have no budget because you have not instituted varnasrama-dharma, dividing the devotees into their natural four varnas. This is how economic development is created, Vedically. And, actually, I have a BIG home. You may not be aware, but I have been throwing my "2 cents" in on this subject for many years, so that surely adds up to a couple dollars by now. And I didn't really attack anyone; I asked a simple question, albeit admittedly a loaded question - I asked WHY the leaders hadn't done this (implement Srila Prabhupada's orders to start varnasrama colleges in EVERY center) You kind of answered it in a round-about-way, but hardly satisfying to a vituperative person like myself. > I for one don't appreciate it much . I think you will find a positive > approach would work better . I open to any suggestions for a healthy, positive agenda for the implementation of varnasrama-dharma. My thankless task of vituperativeness could finally come to an end, though it would confirm the adage - the squeaky wheel always gets the grease! > That said , I apologize if my text has been offensive to you Nary a word you said have I found offensive in the least. Indeed, it was quite invigorating, Maharaja! If it shook you up, that was the intent, with all due respect. To open a meaningful dialog of a subject which was so dear to our guru, it seems a trivial disturbance. I > would like to submit , although unbelievable to some , that we are > sensitive people also . Good to hear. Share your sensitivity with others in a varnasrama-dharma counseling session today! Hari! Hari! With all respects, sincerely your fallen servant, Janesvara dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 1999 Report Share Posted July 24, 1999 > > Also I don't agree with you . There have been many discussions , > > seminars and even attempts at establishing parts of varnasrama . Many > > papers have been written and even a couple of books . It is not an easy > > subject . > Take baby steps first. You have to crawl before you can run. > Varnasrama-dharma is a very, very comprehensive system of social and > spiritual human culture without doubt. It is like the mathematical systems > which are very comprehensive and have very high levels of practice and > logic. But anyone, even a child, can be a practitioner of the mathematical > system simply by learning the 1+1=2 equation which is true in even the > highest math. In the posts below Srila Prabhupada mentions several 'baby' steps we can take. When he was here, the devotees had to heed his words, and do his bidding, even if somewhat reluctantly. Now he has gone it appears that we have gotten too comfortable in our nice temples to want to go out on the land. Surely the first steps are to create out own 'wealth' from the land. Once in that atmosphere, once we are engaged in working to produce the necesitites from the land where they all spring, our people, being situated in goodness, will begin to discover their real nature, and gravitate towards their rightful situation. It seems that we have simply 'forgotten' how to surrender to his order. If only our leaders could lead the way, and work on the baby steps of getting things together on the land. There is plently of information out there, plenty of help available. But it appears that we dont have the will? Srila Prabhupada: Life should be conducted in such a way that our necessities of life may come not with great effort, easily, easily. We should not encumber ourself, our life, living policy, in an encumbered way. Then our spiritual progress will be hampered. The modern society has practically encumbered the whole human activities, and therefore they have no time for spiritual culture. You see? But the conception of Vedic civilization was that people used to be satisfied on agricultural produce and for three months working during rainy season. So they get some agriculture produce and they used to eat the whole year. So nine months they were free to advance in spiritual culture and only three months they used to work for accumulating their foodstuff. Srila Prabhupada: So as we till our land and get foodstuff according to my labor, according to my intelligence... Food grains I can produce once twice, thrice, if I work hard. Generally, they work two times: three months, three months. And those who are very lazy, they work three months. But even working for three months, they can aquire foodstuffs for the whole year. That I have seen. So similarly, as we get some land and work for yourself End Quote. If we're satisfied with the basic necessities of life, then its indicated here that 3 months work is sufficient. Its not a question of believing, these are the vedic histories. Its just hard to understand how it works because its so foreign to our kali-yuga situation. That shouldn't make us frightened to take it up. That's what "having faith in the words of the spiritual master" is all about. (I lifted the last two paragraphs from a text by Niscala prabhu, which I thought were nicely relevant) Room Conversation New Vrindaban, June 24, 1976 760624RC.NV Prabhupada: This project should be advanced--plain living, high thinking. Dhrstadyumna: I think we'll take around that film of New Vrindaban to all the colleges this year when we are preaching and show it to the students as our practical example. Prabhupada: This is nasty civilization, unnecessarily increasing necessities of life. Anartha. Kirtanananda: We would not have understood you if you had said that eight, ten years ago. Prabhupada: Hmm? Kirtanananda: Ten years ago I know I could not have understood you if you had said that. Now I understand a little bit. Prabhupada: Now suppose these electric lights. So, crude form of light, we grow some castor seed, everything from the earth. This also you are getting from earth, petroleum, and running on machine, and electricity is generated. But really you are getting the impetus from the earth. As soon as the petroleum supply is stopped, everything stopped. But for this purpose you have to search out petroleum from the middle of ocean, boring. Therefore it is ugra-karma. The purpose is that you grow some castor seed, press it, get oil, put in any pot, and one wick, the light is there. So even understanding that you have improved the lighting system, but that is not the only necessity of my life. But to improve from the castor seed lamp, castor oil lamp, to this electricity, you have to work so hard. You have to go to the middle of ocean and drill it and get out petroleum and... In this way your real business of life is finished. The energy and the intelligence you got for your self-realization or your, this precarious position, constantly dying and taking birth in various species of life, this is your problem, and this was to be solved in human life, you have got advanced intelligence, but that intelligence is utilized from castor seed lamp to the electric lamp. That's all. Just try to understand. What is that improvement? And for this improving from castor seed oil lamp to electricity lamp, you forget your real business. You lost yourself. This civilization is going on. This is called maya. For some fictitious happiness you lose your whole purpose of life. It is difficult to understand, but the fact is there. But you are under the control of nature, you have to give up this body. All right, you make very nice arrangement to live here, nature will not allow you to live. You must die. And after death you are going to get another body. So in this body, working for high grade electricity lamp, you work so hard, have got your own business, and next life by the lawsof nature, if you get the body of a dog, then what is the benefit? That you cannot check. What is the answer? Hmm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 1999 Report Share Posted July 24, 1999 On 23 Jul 1999, Sridhar Swami wrote: > I for one don't appreciate it much . I think you will find a positive > approach would work better . > > That said , I apologize if my text has been offensive to you or others . I > would like to submit , although unbelievable to some , that we are sensitive > people also . Enough leader bashing , please . Dear Maharaj, Pamho. AGtSP! Thank you very much for this reasoned post. It expresses my own thoughts, but I am to fearful to express them in these forums. Just another flame war breaks out. It is too depressing. Actions speak louder than words. So, for my own insignificant part I am single-handedly developing a project here in North Idaho. Later on, when the BIG troubles start, maybe others will join me. Thank you for your succint encouragement. your fallen servant, bhuta-bhavana dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 1999 Report Share Posted July 24, 1999 ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- --------------------------- > > Also I don't agree with you . There have been many discussions , > > seminars and even attempts at establishing parts of varnasrama . Many > > papers have been written and even a couple of books . It is not an easy > > subject . > Take baby steps first. You have to crawl before you can run. > Varnasrama-dharma is a very, very comprehensive system of social and > spiritual human culture without doubt. It is like the mathematical systems > which are very comprehensive and have very high levels of practice and > logic. But anyone, even a child, can be a practitioner of the mathematical > system simply by learning the 1+1=2 equation which is true in even the > highest math. In the posts below Srila Prabhupada mentions several 'baby' steps we can take. When he was here, the devotees had to heed his words, and do his bidding, even if somewhat reluctantly. Now he has gone it appears that we have gotten too comfortable in our nice temples to want to go out on the land. Surely the first steps are to create out own 'wealth' from the land. Once in that atmosphere, once we are engaged in working to produce the necesitites from the land where they all spring, our people, being situated in goodness, will begin to discover their real nature, and gravitate towards their rightful situation. It seems that we have simply 'forgotten' how to surrender to his order. If only our leaders could lead the way, and work on the baby steps of getting things together on the land. There is plently of information out there, plenty of help available. But it appears that we dont have the will? Srila Prabhupada: Life should be conducted in such a way that our necessities of life may come not with great effort, easily, easily. We should not encumber ourself, our life, living policy, in an encumbered way. Then our spiritual progress will be hampered. The modern society has practically encumbered the whole human activities, and therefore they have no time for spiritual culture. You see? But the conception of Vedic civilization was that people used to be satisfied on agricultural produce and for three months working during rainy season. So they get some agriculture produce and they used to eat the whole year. So nine months they were free to advance in spiritual culture and only three months they used to work for accumulating their foodstuff. Srila Prabhupada: So as we till our land and get foodstuff according to my labor, according to my intelligence... Food grains I can produce once twice, thrice, if I work hard. Generally, they work two times: three months, three months. And those who are very lazy, they work three months. But even working for three months, they can aquire foodstuffs for the whole year. That I have seen. So similarly, as we get some land and work for yourself End Quote. If we're satisfied with the basic necessities of life, then its indicated here that 3 months work is sufficient. Its not a question of believing, these are the vedic histories. Its just hard to understand how it works because its so foreign to our kali-yuga situation. That shouldn't make us frightened to take it up. That's what "having faith in the words of the spiritual master" is all about. (I lifted the last two paragraphs from a text by Niscala prabhu, which I thought were nicely relevant) Room Conversation New Vrindaban, June 24, 1976 760624RC.NV Prabhupada: This project should be advanced--plain living, high thinking. Dhrstadyumna: I think we'll take around that film of New Vrindaban to all the colleges this year when we are preaching and show it to the students as our practical example. Prabhupada: This is nasty civilization, unnecessarily increasing necessities of life. Anartha. Kirtanananda: We would not have understood you if you had said that eight, ten years ago. Prabhupada: Hmm? Kirtanananda: Ten years ago I know I could not have understood you if you had said that. Now I understand a little bit. Prabhupada: Now suppose these electric lights. So, crude form of light, we grow some castor seed, everything from the earth. This also you are getting from earth, petroleum, and running on machine, and electricity is generated. But really you are getting the impetus from the earth. As soon as the petroleum supply is stopped, everything stopped. But for this purpose you have to search out petroleum from the middle of ocean, boring. Therefore it is ugra-karma. The purpose is that you grow some castor seed, press it, get oil, put in any pot, and one wick, the light is there. So even understanding that you have improved the lighting system, but that is not the only necessity of my life. But to improve from the castor seed lamp, castor oil lamp, to this electricity, you have to work so hard. You have to go to the middle of ocean and drill it and get out petroleum and... In this way your real business of life is finished. The energy and the intelligence you got for your self-realization or your, this precarious position, constantly dying and taking birth in various species of life, this is your problem, and this was to be solved in human life, you have got advanced intelligence, but that intelligence is utilized from castor seed lamp to the electric lamp. That's all. Just try to understand. What is that improvement? And for this improving from castor seed oil lamp to electricity lamp, you forget your real business. You lost yourself. This civilization is going on. This is called maya. For some fictitious happiness you lose your whole purpose of life. It is difficult to understand, but the fact is there. But you are under the control of nature, you have to give up this body. All right, you make very nice arrangement to live here, nature will not allow you to live. You must die. And after death you are going to get another body. So in this body, working for high grade electricity lamp, you work so hard, have got your own business, and next life by the lawsof nature, if you get the body of a dog, then what is the benefit? That you cannot check. What is the answer? Hmm? (Text COM:2501916) -------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 1999 Report Share Posted July 24, 1999 > I > would like to submit , although unbelievable to some , that we are > sensitive people also . Enough leader bashing , please . > > Your servant > Sridhar Swami Dear Maharaja, Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! I must admit, that in my last letter I reacted a bit to hars towards our GBC members.This reaction was caused by reading recently, tragic letters from abused guru kula children, which completely broke my hart.Also this latest business with Satadhanya didnt help me much, it was just throwing petrol on fire. Thats way I would like to appologize now, to all the GBC members that I have offended.I hope that you will forgive me. I would like to ask the GBC members and the members of this conference, one question.Now that ISKCON has gradualy expanded, there is an overwhelming need in our society for better leadership, guidance and especially protection of its members.To fulfill these needs and make our GBC body much affective, is it possible to divide authority in GBC into a braminical and ksatriya authority? Authority will be divided into two committees: a)The braminical committee - will direct ksatriyas in execution of plans, by provideing the necessary knowledge and input.They will also make sure that ksatriya is acting according to ksatriya principles. b)The ksatriya committee - will rull and execute the plans according to knowledge and input received from brahmanas. Knowing their dutys, these two groups can work very nicely together, for the benefit of every member of our society.Why?Because, each member of the group is properly situated, according to his abilitys.We cannot have, the benefits of a ksatriya and the responsibilities of a brahmana. To get things going, our zonal GBC representatives should recomend nice devotees,who have managerial capacity, from their zone, to receive necessary education for this service.Also we should recruite the best executive managers that we already have.The candidates who achieve best results will be recommended for a position in Executive ksatriya committee. Our brahmanas who are experts in social-manegerial affairs should conduct this seminar, not only now, but every year for different candidates. Every society needs rules and regulations, especialy our society who is crying out for protection and leadership.All we need is a possitive approach to this matter, and with little help from Krsna, things will work out fine. Your servant, Janaka das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 1999 Report Share Posted July 25, 1999 On 24 Jul 1999, Samba das wrote: > > Now he has gone it appears that we > have gotten too comfortable in our nice temples to want to go out on the land. > Which 'nice comfortable temples' where you refering too? Temple life is fairly austere, in my mind. Then, in VAD, brahmancaris generally weren't trained to be farmers. > > Srila Prabhupada: Life should be conducted in such a way that our > necessities of life may come not with great effort, easily, easily. We > should not encumber ourself, our life, living policy, in an encumbered way. Then our spiritual progress will be hampered. > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. I mean, that's what Prabhupada just said, right? ys, Sthita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 On 24 Jul 1999, Caitanya Candrodaya wrote: > Yes positive approach to VA will also include respect to leaders. It is one of > the simptoms of social despair that people who advocate VA are extremely > disrespectful towards it. Leaders must command respect, not demand respect. Generally, advocates of the daiva varnasrama-dharma institution as described and promoted by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami over 25 years ago appreciate the responsibility which comes with the title of "leader": >From Srila Prabhupada's VAD morning walk conversations 3/74: "Devotee: So in our movement the leaders must decide how every devotee and every resource is engaged properly. Srila Prabhupada: Yes. That is leadership. Which man is fitted for which work. Atreya Rsi: Utilization of all resources, including devotees, funds and everything? Srila Prabhupada: Yes. The first thing is to see that everyone is engaged. How they are to be engaged, that requires leadership." "Srila Prabhupada: There is employment even for the women. Gandhi also studied this. Women should be engaged for weaving, spinning. Everyone should be engaged. That is management. So our GBC members must see that in every temple everyone is engaged. Devotee: That is the meaning of leadership. Srila Prabhupada: Yes, that is the meaning of leadership." "Bhagavan: The leader must be very expert so people will be happy in there engagement. Srila Prabhupada: Everyone should be expert. The leader must be expert and the worker must be expert so that he will follow the instruction of the leader." "First of all varna and when the varna is perfectly in order, then there is asrama. ...And when the varna is working perfectly, then we give them the asrama. ...asrama, that is later on." When the "leaders" of this movement manifest the symptoms of true Vedic leaders by implementing the instructions of the pure devotee as regards dividing this society into four varnas and the respective training, they will command respect from the citizens. Very, very little leadership has been seen over the last 25 years in the direction of implementing Srila Prabhupada's orders for varnasrama-dharma. The leaders can claim that they have been endlessly working hard at serving Srila Prabhupada's mission and therefore deserve "a break", but if they are creating the "emergencies" by mismanagement and lack of true varnasrama leadership, what can be said? If they had been earnestly trying to implement varnasrama-dharma for the last 25 years according to the detailed instructions of Srila Prabhupada and had met with failure due to other circumstances they would have at least been trying to do the righteous thing. > VA will develope not from some kind of revolution or implementation but by > economic and cultural nessecity of each person. And then it can be thought to > others. Where did Srila Prabhupada EVER say this kind of crap? Why did he speak to his senior disciples every morning for four consecutive days in the Holiest of ALL dhamas, Vrindavana, on the subject of IMPLEMENTING varnasrama-dharma in this society of devotees? Wake up and smell the roses. > Another thing is clear that being unsensitive to others one completley puts > one off the whole paradigm of Varnasrama which is based on respect. Especially > respect to sannyasi and brahmanas. Nice sentiment. But Arjuna had to fight for righteousness, not go to the forest and pretend to become a brahmana. Respect to sannyasis and brahmanas is required, but qualifications must be there to define sannyasis and brahmans, otherwise is it just the despised caste system. Sannyasis and brahmans were given orders by Srila Prabhupada over 25 years ago as to what they were to do as regards varnasrama-dharma implementaion in ISKCON and it has simply and emphatically been neglected. The result is chaos throughout the social structure of ISKCON and neglect of cows and bulls. There is very clear evidence. > The topic is complex but it shows the attitude of persons advocating VA. The topic (varnasrama-dharma) has complexity but can be practiced even by a child. 1+1=2 even in the highest sciences. Any "leader" who cannot take the heat of the position is a leader in name only. Personally, I take it as a welcome challenge to my abilities when confronted with such things. I have on many occasions had to face hundreds of angry union members who were upset with certain contract negotiations and threatened walkouts from major office complexes with thousands of workers. Dismissing their requests and demands would have proved disastrous; it required careful and strategic negotiating to resolve key issues with these "citizens". If you can't take the heat, get out of the fire. Ksatriyas by nature, will rise to the challenge. The direction, though, must be TOWARDS varnasrama-dharma implementation NOT away from it as we have seen over the last 25 years. Maybe a concerted effort should be attempted for once by the leaders of ISKCON to prioritize varnasrama-dharma preaching and dividing the society into four varnas as advised by their guru maharaja. Perhaps the criticism wil then abate. Try it, ya never know! For as long as the "leaders" of ISKCON do not clearly prioritize varnasrama-dharma (dividing the society into four varnas with respective training for EVERY ISKCON devotee, EVERYDAY in EVERY center, full support of cow and bull protection, etc.) they will be open to and deserve criticism from the citizens who suffer the consequences of such unqualified and neglectful leaders. "Leaders" who attempt to scare citizens into apathy through tactics of control and "leader-bashing" defenses are not protecting their citizens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > Which 'nice comfortable temples' where you refering too? Temple life is > fairly austere, in my mind. For the rank and file 'devotee in the corridor' admittedly life can be quite austere. But some leaders do appear to have somewhat better facilities. I remember Bhagavan and Jayatirthas facilities were downright luxurious, although relatively small in volume, their personal quarters were almost in the class of 'emperors': the best of everything. Once upon a time, I would not have dared to have said such a thing, for fear of being labled 'envious'. But facts are facts. Whether a particular leader deserves to have such comforts, should be judged individualy. In any case always thought that an 'acarya' was supposed to teach by example. The examples of the above mentioned 'leaders', were not that positive. Of course Srila Prabhupada did have certain comforts, but then, HE deserved such comforts, thousands of times over, but he was always prepared to live simply, as shown when he chose to stay with Gour Govinda Swami in his simple hut in Bhuvanesvara, and numerous other examples. > Then, in VAD, brahmancaris generally weren't trained to be farmers. I dont think that is an accurate statement. Having lived in various parts of India for over 11 years, 2 of those years traveling in remote villages with Padayatra and Lokanath Swami, I personaly witnessed the rural character of Indian life. Practicaly every person had some connection to the land. As I have mentioned before on this conference, in temple towns such as Udupi, or Melkote etc, the brahmins also farmed the land for their essential commodities. Our temples are completely dependant on outside society to survive. Begging money on the street to 'buy' food. 'Buying' food is a result of a very recent ugrakarmic societal change. For thousands of years food was grown by almost everyone. So a young boy destined to be a bramachary in such society certainly grew up with connections to the land. Growing food, was an essential requirement, not a luxury. Bramachary training was an additional training for spiritual advancement, but they had to eat too! Even Lord Krsna himself collected firewood for Sandipani Muni, and took the cows out to pasture. > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC > that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. I mean, that's what > Prabhupada just said, right? Yes that's what Srila Prabhupada said. Why is it that we don't believe him? What I find even more interesting is that Srila Prabhupadas optimism regarding natural farming methods (as practised in India in his youth) is shared by modern day natural farmers! They have confirmed his words in practise, today! It is only us that lag behind in accepting the transcendental words that passed his lips. The pure devotee speaks truth, it is advisable to act on that truth (especialy for the disciple, or siksa follower). If we fail, that is our fault, try again, the words of the pure devotee are not uttered in vain. YS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC > that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. Hey.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Samba das wrote: I > I remember Bhagavan and Jayatirthas facilities were downright luxurious, although relatively small in volume, their personal quarters were almost in the class of 'emperors': the best of everything. > > Once upon a time, I would not have dared to have said such a thing, for fear of being labled 'envious'. But facts are facts. > Yep, sanyassi's are meant to be austere, otherwise why bother with it? Obviously, these two devotees mentioned above have since had to deal with ashrama adjustments, or worse. Even during the so called 'luxurious' days, Prabhupada's personal lifestyle appeared fairly simple -- just a room, some basic prasada. His travel was soley for maintaining the institution and preaching. Obviously he didn't own personal mansions with garages full of Mercedes and young women attendents, like that -- though some could look upon his relationship with the movement in that light. > > Our temples are completely dependant on outside society to survive. Begging money on the street to 'buy' food. > In VAD, begging did not have the same stigma as it does in the West. Further, all food 'comes from the land', whether is is factory farmed by a capitalist, or grown by an organic farmer. In VAD, there were also large cities like Dvarka and Hastinapura. Not that everyone in those cities had a connection to farming. > So a young boy destined to be a bramachary in such society > certainly grew up with connections to the land. Growing food, was an > essential requirement, not a luxury. > Yes, we all have a connection to the land, materially speaking, and in modern society that is not such a prominant idea. People in the West generally haven't had to worry about their next meal within recent memory. It seems feeling connected with the land is a good idea if it helps you feel connected to God. > > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. I mean, that's what Prabhupada just said, right? > > Yes that's what Srila Prabhupada said. Why is it that we don't believe him? > Obviously I was being sarcastic. It does kind of amaze me though, that some of the devotees who appear most preoccupied by living a peaceful life in the material world so often express how disatisfied they are. I mean, who's stopping them from living simply and naturally? It seems to me whether or not it Vedically rains only at night, etc, one can still feel peaceful and satisfied in his KC. > What I find even more interesting is that Srila Prabhupadas optimism > regarding natural farming methods (as practised in India in his youth) is shared by modern day natural farmers! They have confirmed his words in > practise, today! > Naturally farming is great, particularly if it helps inspire rememberance of our natural relation with Krsna. > If we fail, that is our fault, try again, the words of the pure > devotee are not uttered in vain. > Again, who is stopping like minded devotees from pursuing a simple natural life? Why does every initiative need to be approved and led by a 'big brother' who mirrors our every personal conviction? Prabhupada gave very many instructions encompassing the entire experience of KC, not just one's we may feel intimately inspired by. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Balarama das wrote: > > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. > > Hey.... My philosphy is "anyone's fault but mine!" .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Balarama das wrote: > > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC > > that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. > > Hey.... He forgot to add the ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 On 25 Jul 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > > > Leaders must command respect, not demand respect. > Similarly, members can also consider commanding the respect, and not demanding the respect, from those in leadership positions. > > Very, very little leadership has been seen over the last 25 years in the direction of implementing Srila Prabhupada's orders for varnasrama-dharma. > Fortunately, as a ksatriya, you can lead those of us who wish to follow you. > > Nice sentiment. But Arjuna had to fight for righteousness, not go to the forest and pretend to become a brahmana. > Boy, that's a cool perspective. Now we can label everyone who doesn't see as we do a ksatriya so we can punch them in the nose, and in the forest, none-the-less! How intriguing. > > If you can't take the heat, get out of the fire. Ksatriyas by nature, will rise to the challenge. > Yes, ksatriyas sometimes go seeking a fight. But labelling disagreeable brahmanas as ksatriya so we can fight with them doesn't to me seem particularly chivalrous. I mean, ksatriya don't simply respect and protect only those brahmanas who speak as they are told to speak. Without genuine mutual respect between the higher varnas, there will be no VAD. > > Maybe a concerted effort should be attempted for once by the leaders of ISKCON to prioritize varnasrama-dharma preaching and dividing the society into four varnas as advised by their guru maharaja. Perhaps the criticism wil then abate. Try it, ya never know! > For the life of me I just don't know why Janesvara Prabhu, as a sincere discple, an expert ksaytriya manager and an inspiring organizer, doesn't get together a few of his followers and who wish to pass around the Vedic name tags. Surely he will attract qualified brahmanas who can give the appropriate guidance and qualified vaisyas to support his endeavor. Then we can all be practically inspired by his practical example, instead of simply hearing how he finds our present condition so dissapointing. > > "Leaders" who attempt to scare citizens into apathy through tactics of control and "leader-bashing" defenses are not protecting their citizens. > It's been a long, long time since I last heard of anyone being 'scared' by an ISKCON leader. Some sanyassi simply stating his case doesn't leave me with nightmares, by Krsna's grace. ys, Sthita .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Samba das wrote: > I am simply waiting for the day when the first volume of 5 volumes of Srila Prabhupadas extensive instructions for varnasrama become available, so that the general devotees can be aware of how essential varnsrama is for our society. > Now there is an interesting idea -- education before action! .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > For the life of me I just don't know why Janesvara Prabhu, as a sincere > discple, an expert ksaytriya manager and an inspiring organizer, doesn't > get together a few of his followers and who wish to pass around the Vedic > name tags. Surely he will attract qualified brahmanas who can give the > appropriate guidance and qualified vaisyas to support his endeavor. Then > we can all be practically inspired by his practical example, instead of > simply hearing how he finds our present condition so dissapointing. Yes. You have worded my feeling. Why he doesn´t just do it instead of criticizing others? Srila Prabhupada´s mission is multifold. As Samba pointed out, one-sided visions, be it varnasrama vision or big-collecting vision, are not complete. Different missions for different people, according to atraction. To try to impose a one-sided vision on others, even if it is such a comprehensive vision as varnasrama-dharma, was not Srila Prabhupada´s mood. He never pushed a kind of service at the expense of others, but always respected everyone´s engagement. He always repeated "variety is the mother of enjoyment", "Krsna is the enjoyer of different kinds of services". He gave many different instructions to different people in different times. No one can say "this is the most important instruction". The only one most important instruction is to develop love for God. All other dharmas, varnasrama 1974 instructions included, are subservient to this one. If we take varnasrama´s 74 and try to impose it on others without appreciating the service that others have done or are doing, we are missing the main instruction and are doing only harm to the varnasrama cause, creating rejection. ´Cause everyone is tired of fanaticism and single-minded minds: "Mine´s is the only valid approach. All others are deviated". Ys Bhagavata-Purana Dasa Srila Prabhupada said many times: This is the most important thing to do, speaking of many different matters. Book distribution is the most important thing, Farming is the most important thing, Deity Worship is the most important thing, street Harinam is the most important thing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 Please stop clogging up the NAGBC conference with these messages. Take off the NAGBC as a receiver. If you like you can address the members individually, but the conference is not meant for these sorts of discussions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > > > If we fail, that is our fault, try again, the words of the pure devotee > > are not uttered in vain. > > > > Again, who is stopping like minded devotees from pursuing a simple natural > life? Why does every initiative need to be approved and led by a 'big > brother' who mirrors our every personal conviction? Money. - mnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > > > > > If you can't take the heat, get out of the fire. Ksatriyas by nature, > > will > rise to the challenge. > > .... Get'em out, Janesvara! Fire them! (they seem not to bother getting some fire there up, so... ) - mnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > > > In VAD, begging did not have the same stigma as it does in the West. Further, > all food 'comes from the land', whether is is factory farmed by a capitalist, > or grown by an organic farmer. In VAD, there were also large cities like > Dvarka and Hastinapura. Not that everyone in those cities had a connection to > farming. But all the foodstuffs in those cities were grown by devotees. "Advaita Acarya, My spiritual master, should never accept charity from rich men or kings, because if a spiritual master accepts money or grains from such materialists his mind becomes polluted. <br>PURPORT <br>It is very risky to accept money or food from materialistic persons, for such acceptance pollutes the mind of the charity's recipient. According to the Vedic system, one should give charity to sannyasis and brahmanas because one who thus gives charity becomes free from sinful activities. Formerly, therefore, brahmanas would not accept charity from a person unless he were very pious. Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu gave this instruction for all spiritual masters. Materialistic persons who are not inclined to give up their sinful activities like illicit sex, intoxication, gambling and meat-eating sometimes want to become our disciples, but, unlike professional spiritual masters who accept disciples regardless of their condition, Vaisnavas do not accept such cheap disciples. One must at least agree to abide by the rules and regulations for a disciple before a Vaisnava acarya can accept him. In fact, a Vaisnava should not even accept charity or food from persons who do not follow the rules and regulations of the Vaisnava principles. <p>>>> Ref. VedaBase => Adi 12.50 > > It seems to me whether or not it Vedically rains only at night, etc, one can > still feel peaceful and satisfied in his KC. As a young Christian farm boy, working 6 10 hour days a week, we considered the ideal rain one that started at 5:00 PM saturday afternoon, so we could quit an hour early, that would rain gently all night until about 10:00 AM sunday morning. It would be about an inch, which would be absorbed enough so we could be back in the fields by 7:00 AM Monday morning. Perfect rain, no lost field time, quit early Saturday night and yet have a nice day to relax on Sunday after church. All ksatriyas please note - making this a weekly arrangement would win my undying loyalty to you. As far as the GBC implementing VAD, if you were to read the Minimum Cow Standards as passed by the GBC at this year's Mayapur festival, you will see that in their capacity as brahmans setting a direction, they have set forth the basis for VAD. Now it remains for the ksatriyas to implement it. The theorectical framework is there. Again, who is stopping like minded devotees from pursuing a simple natural > life? Why does every initiative need to be approved and led by a 'big brother' > who mirrors our every personal conviction? Our material conditioning is stopping us. Too many Pepsi and Buick commercials when we were in our formative stages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 1999 Report Share Posted July 27, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Mahanidhi das wrote: > > > > > > > Again, who is stopping like minded devotees from pursuing a simple natural life? Why does every initiative need to be approved and led by a 'big brother' who mirrors our every personal conviction? > > Money. > Simplicity does not require wealth -- austerity is the wealth of the brahmanas. And besides, I doubt you can buy VAD. Even if you could, ISKCON isn't an organization swimming in cash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 1999 Report Share Posted July 27, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > But all the foodstuffs in those cities were grown by devotees. > Not everyone even in Krsna's time was a devotee. > It is very risky to accept money or food from materialistic persons, > for such acceptance pollutes the mind of the charity's recipient. buying produce at the market is not accepting charity. > > As far as the GBC implementing VAD, if you were to read the Minimum Cow Standards as passed by the GBC at this year's Mayapur festival, you will see that in their capacity as brahmans setting a direction, they have set forth the basis for VAD. Now it remains for the ksatriyas to implement it. The theorectical framework is there. > I agree that for the GBC to be effective they must take a brahminical role. > > Our material conditioning is stopping us. Too many Pepsi and Buick commercials when we were in our formative stages. > We have met the enemy, and he is us. Still, VAD is an entire culture, you can't simply imbide it overnight by reading a few slokas. ys, Sthita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 1999 Report Share Posted July 27, 1999 I apologize for any contribution I may have made to clogging up of your conference. The receivers were already on the text which I responded to; I didn't know who wanted to be a receiver or not. Hari! Hari! > [Text 2507558 from COM] > > Please stop clogging up the NAGBC conference with these messages. Take off > the NAGBC as a receiver. If you like you can address the members > individually, but the conference is not meant for these sorts of > discussions. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 1999 Report Share Posted July 27, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Sthita-dhi-muni Dasa wrote: > On 26 Jul 1999, Balarama das wrote: > > > > I'd have to agree with Janesvara on this one. It is the fault of the GBC > that I don't have an easy life in Krsna consciousness. > > > > Hey.... > > > My philosphy is "anyone's fault but mine!" We need not blame anyone else, including the GBC for our own problems. My problems are my fault. But I am resourceful and can take care of myself and mine and always have. I have never needed charity. My concern is not for the GBCs neglect of me; it is for those many, many devotees who are in need of protection in one form or another. Cows, women and children to name a few. These citizens have been neglected by unqualified leaders for many, many years. No one can deny. If those "leaders" who were neglectful and sometimes criminal are now gone from the movement this is good. I naturally have my doubts, but will wait to see the symptoms of the "new" leader's embracing the implementation of Srila Prabhupada's orders regarding varnasrama-dharma within the society. If the new leaders do not do so, their citizens will go down the same abusive path as before and the "leaders" will lead the way. Until varnasrama-dharma starts to become a priority issue in everyday ISKCON policy and preaching, chaos, unhappiness, and mismanagement will continue to reign. Cows, women and children, and others, will continue to suffer spiritually and materially. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 1999 Report Share Posted July 27, 1999 On 26 Jul 1999, Sthita-dhi-muni Dasa wrote: > > On 25 Jul 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > > Leaders must command respect, not demand respect. > Similarly, members can also consider commanding the respect, and not demanding > the respect, from those in leadership positions. Interesting turn of an otherwise meaningful truth. Doesn't make much sense, but interesting. Citizens have the distinct right and duty to DEMAND protection by leaders for those needing protection (cows, women, children and the implementation of varnasrama for all). This has not been the case over the last 20+ years. Or maybe you are saying it was the victims fault? > > Very, very little leadership has been seen over the last 25 years in the > direction of implementing Srila Prabhupada's orders for varnasrama-dharma. > Fortunately, as a ksatriya, you can lead those of us who wish to follow you. I am not a leader in ISKCON anymore. I remain a ksatriya engaged in management responsibilities where I am. I try to remember Krsna while doing my duty everyday. I do not want followers. I want to help those that seek protection or need protection without asking for it, get that protection. Through education citizens will become confident in asserting their right to protection by their leaders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.