Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 > > Also, how in this day and age would you ascertain this to be > > the case? > > Dharma means the intrinsic nature of something. Dharmic laws are tailored > according to this eternal nature and are thus eternally applicable. Of course. But applying dharma, even sanatana dharma, according to time, place and circumstance is another thing. That usually takes an empowered person. Srila Prabhupada, for example, was able to expertly distinguish between eternal principles and details, and thus he was able to present the principles in a way appropriate to his preaching field, but without any compromise. Not everyone can do that, and I think we need to be very careful when we start talking about dharma sastras such as the Manu Smriti, especially as we do not have an authorised version presented by a person like Prabhupada. (And I do recognise that Srila Prabhupada wanted these sastras to be applied) I don't know what things are like in India these days, but here in the West we are dealing with 99.9% naradhamas. Call them what you will -- varna-sankara, duskritina, antyaja -- the bottom line is that they can't strictly follow anything. They first require purification and hence the primary thrust of the acharyas has been to establish the sankirtana movement. To try to immediately apply strict dharmic principles, even to those coming to KC, is an endeavour doomed to failure, IMHO. We first need to get them to hear and chant - seriously and regularly, nityam bhagavata sevaya - and then perhaps we can start talking about the Manu Smriti and other such texts, important as they are. yhs KDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.