Guest guest Posted December 17, 1998 Report Share Posted December 17, 1998 > > > This guru-daksina business is spoiling ISKCON and people. > Money is powerful. Our gurus may be competing to get > more followers simply in order to get more money from > them, thus insuring their position of control in the > society. Yes, the rules seem to be simple everywhere. > You got money, you rule. > While that certainly may be true of some, to make it as a blank statement about all gurus may be going a little too far. Case by case basis for gurus, just like we have been asking for women. > I do not need to quote any sastra on this subject, to > support my statements about how it is wrong for a > sannyasi to be keeping "his" money, do I? The danger would be to become what Srila Prabhupada refered to as professional reciters of the Bhagvatam. It is a pitfall to be avoided by swamis and gurus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 1998 Report Share Posted December 17, 1998 > The other "Vedics" have probably > left this forum in digust. If I can't have it my way, I won't play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 1998 Report Share Posted December 17, 1998 On 16 Dec 1998, Madhava Gosh wrote: > If I can't have it my way, I won't play? > Nah, they're just too grown up to play your games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 1998 Report Share Posted December 17, 1998 > This guru-daksina business is spoiling ISKCON and people. > > Money is powerful. Our gurus may be competing to get > > more followers simply in order to get more money from > > them, thus insuring their position of control in the > > society. Yes, the rules seem to be simple everywhere. > > You got money, you rule. > > > > While that certainly may be true of some, to make it as a blank statement > about all gurus may be going a little too far. Case by case basis for > gurus, just like we have been asking for women. Certainly. I would never think in term of "all gurus". I guess my words were more clampsy than what I meant. I guess I have become oversensitive in regard to this "guru-daksina is the personal property of a guru-sannyas" claim. Money & power. We have seen it in ISKCON, this patern of fall down for quite some sannyasis-gurus, that left the devestating results to the society. > > The danger would be to become what Srila Prabhupada refered to as > professional reciters of the Bhagvatam. It is a pitfall to be avoided by > swamis and gurus. Therefore no money in the private possesion of. ys mnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 1998 Report Share Posted December 17, 1998 WWW: Bhuta-bhavana (Dasa) ACBSP (Incline Village NV - USA) wrote: > [Text 1942600 from COM] > > On 16 Dec 1998, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > > If I can't have it my way, I won't play? > > > > Nah, they're just too grown up to play your games. Or is it grown too attached? Let's see, GHQ plan - no woman as TPs. Srila Prabhupada - Women can be TP. Gosh - Women can be TP GHQ - We're not playing that came, we're out of here. Gosh - Don't let the door hit you in the lower rear gate on the way out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 1998 Report Share Posted December 17, 1998 > The solution is to have policies, controls, and audits of expenditures made > by everyone in Iskcon from donations received by them. At least the bigger > amounts. Ours must be the ONLY organisation in the world where millions of > dollars can be received and spent without anyone to audit what you have done > with the money. HKDD comments: Very good point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 1998 Report Share Posted December 18, 1998 > > > The solution is to have policies, controls, and audits of expenditures made > by everyone in Iskcon from donations received by them. At least the bigger > amounts. Ours must be the ONLY organisation in the world where millions of > dollars can be received and spent without anyone to audit what you have done > with the money. Letter Jan. 16 1975 I think your idea about having professional men do our accounting in order to assure good accounting, is a good proposal. Letter March 18, 1971 Bookkeeping is the most important item. As you are growing in stature, our accounting system should become very perfect. We have to publish now a short statement of accounts. As we increase our life membership number, we must submit our audited accounts and that will convince the public of our stability. Letter Aug 12 1971 Too many cooks spoil the broth. I have therefore asked Tamala and Gurudasa to go to Delhi for organizing a center there. Jayapataka can take care of the accounts and you and Revatinandana Maharaja along with other assistants be engaged in collecting funds. That will be nice. ** wants our accounts audited but I have asked for the trial balance and balance sheet, but ** is silent on this point. How things will be audited unless accounts are kept systematically according to the scientific accounting system? Scientific keeping of accounts is tested by the trial balance and balance sheet. GBC does not mean to control a center. GBC means to see that the activities of a center go on nicely. I do not know why ** is exercising his absolute authority. That is not the business of GBC. The president, treasurer and secretary are responsible for managing the center. GBC is to see that things are going nicely but not to exert absolute authority. That is not in the power of GBC. ** should not do like that. The GBC men cannot impose anything on the men of a center without consulting all of the GBC members first. A GBC member cannot go beyond the jurisdiction of his power. We are in the experimental stage but in the next meeting of the GBC members they should form a constitution how the GBC members manage the whole affair. But it is a fact that the local president is not under the control of the GBC. Yes, for improvement of situations such as this I must be informed of everything. Letter Oct 16, 1971 You have written to say that the account are being kept by our men in India not in a very proper way. That I admit because most of them were not accountants previously, neither they were very much responsible to their family or country. Somehow or other on account of their previous pious activities, they have come to Krishna Consciousness. So we should very sympathetically treat amongst ourselves so that our missionary activities may go on without being hampered. Your are experienced in business dealings as well as accounting, so I am confident that by your introduction of system of accounting and business sight dealing will be very much helpful, and in all our branches in India they will follow the system and the whole mess that is already done will be cleared up. My only point is that we are dealing with the public. They are paying us money and we should handle them so carefully so that they may think of us as spotless. Letter 8-24 1971 There will be many discrepancies in the trial balance if books are not kept properly. Trial balance means to test how the accounts are kept scientifically. So if the accounts are not kept properly but haphazardly there will never be a correct trial balance. To present a correct trial balance means to correct the whole past accounting system. One letter has just come from Giriraja in which it is said ``As for accounts, at least the trial balance sheet has shown great discrepancies. For example I have collected Rs 70,000/- from the Maidan advertisers, but only Rs. 55,000/- has been recorded, and after being informed I was able to account for a possible Rs 5600/- of the difference, but still Rs 9,400/- is unaccounted for. Also a profit of Rs. 15,000/- was supposed to have been made due to the maidan program, and that profit was to have paid off a previous Calcutta debt to the building fund, but now that Rs 15,000/- has been spent for maintenance, and an additional Rs 8000/- of membership money collected since the program has also been spent, so the Calcutta debit is now Rs. 23,000/- and is increasing''. Now who will be responsible to account for this Rs 23,000/-? Please let me know. And who has been appointed treasurer and secretary? The president, secretary and treasurer elected by the members of the center cannot be changed at least for one year; better to continue it for three years. All combined together should be responsible for keeping correct accounts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 1998 Report Share Posted December 18, 1998 > > > It takes a lot to disgust me, I used to live in Berkeley. > > yfs,bbd LOL. I 've heard some devotees refer to it as Berserkley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1998 Report Share Posted December 21, 1998 On 18 Dec 1998, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > > > > > It takes a lot to disgust me, I used to live in Berkeley. > > > > yfs,bbd > > LOL. I 've heard some devotees refer to it as Berserkley Actually, my comrades down there call it The People's Republik of Beserkeley. Glad I could get you to laugh, maybe I'm not totally worthless. yfs,bbd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.