Guest guest Posted November 1, 1999 Report Share Posted November 1, 1999 > > in my understanding it's not their fault to look somewhere else for > satisfaction but the point is they should know that what they are going > for will not bring the result *they* may be wanting, and that the people > who they are encouraged by to go to court are not their well wishers. they > need to recognise their friends. > What is exactly that result that "*they* may be wanting"? You must know it for certain, since you state it clearly and self confidently that they will not obtain it (though that *they* don't know it yet). Another thing is, once somebody decides to bring you to the court, he might be quite a way from viewing you as his friend and well wishers. What do you think he takes you to the court on the first place? And, they also may not necessarily be so stupid to consider lawyers and "those who encourage them" as their well wishers. What I mean, we still seam to be failing to face the realities of this world. Everybody seem to be in his illusion about something, just that we always think "they are in illusion". Who's in illusion? Awaking can be a painful process (I got some glimpse of realization on this, if anybody cares to believe). - mnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 1999 Report Share Posted November 2, 1999 Hare Krishna, Could someone please tell me who are the parties involved in this court case? Thanks. Your servant, Sri Rama das [srirama (AT) bbt (DOT) se], or [srirama (AT) reachme (DOT) net] [http://www.web-construct.net/creditcard.html] > > Bhadra.Balaram.JPS (AT) bbt (DOT) se [bhadra.Balaram.JPS (AT) bbt (DOT) se] > > > > These are practical steps that can be taken. > > As are attempts to contact abused children and give support. > > More could be done, but there is a limit where action taken goes out of > > the context of child abuse and simply rides on the back of this > > inflammatory issue to disturb as many ISKCON devotees with no > involvement > > in gurukula, or no involvement in child abuse in gurukula either as > > perpetrator or victim, through blanket propoganda and financial attack. > > a thoughtful text. > > We have to understand that all people who loudly speak against child abuse > are not necessarily interested in children welfare or justice or improving > ISKCON, or whatever. Some of them are simply working in the hands of > kaliyuga who wnats to cripple ISKCON. > > We should not become slave of kaliyuga and help, directly or indirectly, > people like puranjana das (I have never seen him I guess) who has openly > said he wants to destroy ISKCON. Such people will try to find > each and every > possibilty to destroy, divide ISKCON at any cost and in any name. > > We need to learn how to recognise our well wishers and ill wishers. We > should not get tempted of becoming famous over night by going publicly > aginst the GBC or by going to court. I also have complaints > against some of > our leaders' policies, at times I also feel that the leaders are > too slow or > too tolerent (at the cost of others), I even feel that some leaders are > corrupt, and so on but that doesn't constitute enough reasons to > support any > court action. If we want to do something noticeable in our life let it be > constructive. > > And how the court case will help, btw? I am suprised how can some > intelligent people support that action! can they prove how, under the > circumstance, it will help? or just becuase noone helped them they go to > another party, at the risk of millions of dollars of ISKCON's money > collected over years by many hard working devotees? We have to > think wisely > and understand that court cases are not the solution. > > ys, bb > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.