The fly goes for the sore.

[Guest guest]

>

> Where, personally, have I said *all*? Second of all, it is too bad you

> wish to view Srila Prabhupada's statements as so relative.

 

Yes, too bad... To bad for your third attempt to prove

how Srila Prabhupada is holding up all Indian couples as role

models. Well, good that you are finally starting to be aware of

how impossible task it is, that Madhusudani's challange to you.

 

 

> things have changed in India since Srila Prabhuapada has been here, so now

> how do you want to view the statement, 85% of the people? 80%?

 

If "things have changed", as you said it, then a 25-years old

statement about the social situation in India is relative, isn't?

That's basically what I am saying, and that's basically what you are

confirming here. We are agreeing, can't you see it?

 

 

>

> >It's nice to read

> >what he said and understand that his lasting message to us was to strive

> >for a peieceful marriage and without divorce.

> >

> Yes, I agree with you here. But in the name of taking Srila Prabhupada's

> words as relative, and no longer applicable today, you miss out on seeing

> good examples.

 

To make it straight, Srila Prabhupada's above mentioned message in

his quote is certainly aplicable for all times, as I said it already.

 

But his observation of the social situation of 25-years ago, may

or may not be so. It's relative. We got to see what's happaning

nowadays, or in any pint in some future, and then judge for ourselves.

Sure, we could then aslo compare it with some quote of Prabhupada.

Just as you yourself have done it here by your own statement:

 

> The above quote by Srila Prabhupada is still quite true.

 

That's quite relative, isn't it? Well, you are findig out that

it's "still quite true". Perhaps. Perhaps not. That much true,

or that much not true.. Personally, I have no interest to debate

it here. It's your own judgment. As far as I am concerned, I already

made my point, and you confirmed it (though unintentionally, perhaps).

 

 

>

> India is in a big mess, but what has caused that? Besides the fact that

> it is, Kali-yuga there have been hundreds of years of invasions by

> foreign nations, all of whom have been, litterally, hell-bent on

> discrediting and destroying Vedic culture. The Muslim invasion, the

> occupancy of the British especially, has done considerable damage to Vedic

> India.

 

Yes, we acknowledged it already. It's all due to Mrs. Margaret Thatcher,

she did it. With the help of Mayadevi and Mr. Kali. We are just agreeing

all along, don't we?

 

BTW, have you know that Serbia is also in a big mess? Ya know who

did it 'em. First Turks' invasion, for four hundreds of years,

and then Bill Clinton. And Kosovars, of course.

 

 

 

- Mahanidhi d.