hmm Indeed!!!

[Guest guest]

>

>

> I wonder if it will ever become fashionable in ISKCON to relentlessly call

men

> with whom we disagree 'male sex workers' or something equally flattering. I

> guess we feel we can call mothers 'prostitutes' knowing we are someone only a

> mother could love.

 

I have been known to refer to swamis (not all, just the ones I think are

abusing

the position) as l--p d---s. Which I guess is sort of the opposite of a 'male

sex worker'.

[Guest guest]

I don't know what this abbreviation stands for, but, please, let's not become

name

callers or blasphemers.

 

your servant,

 

Hare Krsna dasi

 

COM: Madhava Gosh (das) ACBSP (New Vrindavan - USA) wrote:

 

> [Text 1939527 from COM]

>

> >

> >

> > I wonder if it will ever become fashionable in ISKCON to relentlessly call

> men

> > with whom we disagree 'male sex workers' or something equally flattering. I

> > guess we feel we can call mothers 'prostitutes' knowing we are someone only

a

> > mother could love.

>

> I have been known to refer to swamis (not all, just the ones I think are

> abusing

> the position) as l--p d---s. Which I guess is sort of the opposite of a

'male

> sex worker'.

[Guest guest]

Sorry again, just that male thing about if you call me a name I call you one

back. The intent was to parody Jivan Mukta, not reinforce him. Tasteless,

for

sure, but I am a redneck at heart so please forgive me.

 

COM: Hare Krsna dasi (Brunswick, Maine - USA) wrote:

 

> [Text 1941192 from COM]

>

> I don't know what this abbreviation stands for, but, please, let's not become

> name

> callers or blasphemers.

 

It was certainly an unflattering, if objectively true, assessment of a

man's

ability to perform. Nuff said, sent it late at night, will cease and desist

from

further comments of that nature.