Jivan Mukta & Prostitutes

[Guest guest]

> >So, men of ISKCON (that are from this category, and eager to

> >have the "whore ministry"), simply pay the visit to a prostitute in the

> >place you live at, and both purposes (satisfaction of your lust &

> >protection of ISKCON matajis) will be served.

> How is the ISKCON matajis protection served in that way? They and their

> children may end up with AID`s or other reactions.

 

Well, I guess that's where "condom" issue comes in... But I

would leave it to those who have already shown to had thoroughly

investigated into this direction too.

 

The idea of protection of chaste ladies by having the "outlet"

for men's lust somewhere else than "home" is to prevent these

ladies to be molested, raped, sexually misused. Like that.

 

 

How all this fits in ISKCON, is another question. I belive

the intention of JMD was to primarily stamp some matajis as

prostitutes, or whores, to condemn them as the lowest of

the women. Then when, naturally, matajis got offended, he

played "innocence", "Oh, it is Vedic, the devotional service,

like in Dvaraka, why are you upset? Let's have it, I am for

it fully." So, we got here.

 

However, the actual situation of a whore on the street and an

ISKCON mataji that happened to be remarried or simply engaged

in some preaching activity outside of "home", is a moment that

requieres some sanity to distinguish in between.

 

And, even if in the Vedic society a remarried woman could be

considered a "prostitute", the same label for another time and another

type of society might not be applicable. The "pro-Vedics" seem

to get that far-out idea that if they simply apply some of these

side-by "effects" of the already established perfect Vedic society,

then that perfect society will simply be there by some chance

of miracle. That is big illusion, as I see it. You first got to grow

a tree in order to get the fruits.

 

 

 

ys mnd