Guest guest Posted November 29, 1999 Report Share Posted November 29, 1999 > I think that readers of the text sent out by Adridharana dasa of Calcutta > should note the contradictions in his text: > > > The above are the facts of the case, which are well known to anyone in > > Mayapur. > > > > However the following facts, which indicate that actually something very > > underhand has happened, are not generally well known: > > Then at the end of his text he says: > > > PS : If the above are not facts, please let us know what are the facts > > to clear up the matter. > The PS was from Harsi prabhu, as far as I understand. So, there wasn't contradiction on that part. > Now, either things are facts or they are not. To say "these are the facts" > and then say "if these are not the facts" is simply duplicity and > mischevious. > > The facts will be issued in a day or two once we get an idea of when to > expect the police autopsy report. Until then we humbly request everyone > not to speculate or jump to false conclusions. > I just wonder how does one make an autopsy of a nonexisting body? I mean, if the body of that devotee was burnt? Ys. Sraddha dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.