Guest guest Posted November 22, 1999 Report Share Posted November 22, 1999 At 6:56 -0800 11/22/99, COM: Madhava Gosh (das) ACBSP (New Vrindavan - USA) wrote: > >This guidelines have already been approved by the GBC, the problem is one of >implementation. The theory behing the Minimum Cow Standards were that any >reasonably intelligent person could read them and then assess what was >happening at a particular project, even if they don't have an extensive >farm background. Good timing: Today we all got a copy of those standards again. They deserve to be re-posted frequently. Seems like the quarterly visits are the key to the success of this program. However, somehow I seem to remember that even that has not been done. Did the ministry compile a report on which projects had and had not been visited this year? (I'm sorry if you've already stated this) Is there anything us regular devotees can do to help, besides visiting projects? How about if we ask our local GBCs every time we see them if they've made their visits as pledged (assuming they had made such pledges). I hate to say it, but it's the squeeky wheel that gets the grease and if our leaders know that rank-and-file devotees are concerned and consider this a priority, maybe they'll become more likely to do the same? Ys, Madhusudani dasi Minimum Cow Protection Standards (ISKCON Law 507) Standard 14, LOCAL GBC RESPONSIBILITY XIV LOCAL GBC RESPONSIBILITY Recommended 1) The GBC Should Quarterly a) Meet with cowherds and ox teamsters. This meeting should be a minimum of 1 hour and private. b) Visit every cow facility and traveling program and review records. (See Standard 1) c) Present written reports to the Ministry of Cow Protection and Agriculture. (Report forms will be provided to the GBC) 2) Investigation of Abuses When a GBC receives reports of cow abuse in his/her locale, the complaint must be investigated by the GBC and if found true, the situation must be corrected by consultation with local Farm Council and the Ministry. 3) Follow-up by Investigation Team. Where no action has been initiated after one week following investigation or if the Ministry deems the action insufficient, the Ministry will appoint an investigation team to create a report specifying actions needed to correct the situation. 4) ISKCON's Ministry of Justice Involvement. If corrections are not initiated within one month following the initial abuse report, the problem will be referred to ISKCON's Ministry of Justice for further action to protect the cows. Permitted 1) Monitor Appointed Substitute. The GBC may appoint a monitor to represent him in investigating cow abuse in relation to these standards and to fulfill his quarterly meetings and reports. The GBC must personally make 1 private one hour visitation to the cowherds annually and in addition visit the cow facilities annually, the monitor fulfilling all other duties. 2) Selection of Monitor. The monitor may be chosen from the Local Farm Council (the intent being he is knowledgeable in agricultural practices) or come from outside the community chosen because of nonagricultural reasons) and to be chosen at the GBC's discretion. 3) Response to Abuses Permitted standards are the same as recommended standards #2,3,4 above. Not Allowed Failure to meet even permitted standards. Compliance with this Law will begin to help put in place measures to prevent cow abuse. For copies of Standards and Report forms please contact, iscowp (AT) ovnet (DOT) com . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.