Guest guest Posted April 15, 1999 Report Share Posted April 15, 1999 Here is something forwarded to me about 'Women in Iskcon'. can somebody throw some light on this subject matter. Many pts sound confusing. how to deal with these pts given below. Hare Krishna, Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. > >* When women were made to stand behind men in the back of the temple room >instead of side by side as established formerly, women went on different >occasions to Prabhupada who simply answered: "Why, the men on one side, the women on one side." > >* When the women were made to offer flowers after the men during guru-Puja, instead of simultaneously, Srila Prabhupada, informed by Ekayani, gave the same answer: "Why, the men from one side, the women from one side." (Ekayani) > >* A devotee woman recalls that she was once in Srila Prabhupada's room for a darshan. There were hundreds of visiting devotees from neighboring temples. Before lecturing he insisted that the women (who were all at the back) come and sit up front on one side of the vyasasana. At least 5 sanyasis and about 20 men had to move to make room for the women. Srila Prabhupada sat quietly for about 5 minutes while everyone was relocating themselves and getting situated. > >* One challenger argues, criticizing Srila Prabhupada for his application of the principle of spiritual equality. "If men and women chant together, then why don't they sleep in the same room together?" Srila Prabhupada replied that, although men and women in ISKCON have equal rights, there is a clear line of demarcation indicating where intermingling of the sexes should end. (Manasa Ganga) > >* "I do not know what these things inventions are going on. That is our only business, to invent some new program? We have already got our vaisnava standard. That is sufficient for Madhavacarya, Ramanujcarya, it was sufficient for Lord Chaitanya, six Goswamis, for Bhaktivinoda Thakur, for my Guru Maharaja Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati, for me, for all big, big saints and acaryas in our line, why it shall be inadequate for my disciples so that they must manufacture something? That is not possible. Who has introduced these things, that the women cannot have chanting japa in the temple, cannot perform the arati and so many things. That is not possible. Who has introduced these things, that women cannot have chanting? If they become agitated, then let the brahmacaris go to the forest, I have never introduced these things. If the brahmacaris cannot remain in the presence of women in the temple, then they must go to the forest for not seeing any women, if they become so easily agitated, but then no one will either see them and how our preaching work will go on?" (Letter to Ekayani, 1972) > >* In a morning walk in Nairobi in 1975, the same question came up. Being told that sometimes devotees leave the temple room to chant japa elsewhere, Srila Prabhupada replied: "Why should they walk other places? Who says that you go or walk other places? Who has allowed him to go outside? There is no need. That is the chance of falling down. Why you should go outside? That should be stopped! They cannot go outside" > >MY TWO CENTS: Some may not understand it, so I would like to point something out. In my opinion, Prabhupada expected the temple room was a very pleasant place, free from pressure and was transcendental. Sometimes they are, sometimes they aren't. In any case, that is why I feel he responded like this. That the temple is Vaikuntha, so who would want to leave Vaikuntha except to look for Maya or materialism and sense gratification? Actually, our temples should be run like Vaikuntha's. Then we would have devotees breaking down the doors to attend and help out. > >Later in the same conversation, the same devotee further explained: "What I mean to say is that he says he does not want to chant with the women in the temple room. I have seen this before. He says: "I do not want to chant in a room with women. I'd rather be away from women." Srila Prabhupada answered: "That means he has got distinction between men and women. He is not a pandita. Pandita sama darsinah. He is a fool. That's all. He should always consider, "there is a woman, that's alright. She is my mother." That's all. Matravt para daresu. Suppose you sit down with your mother and chant. What is the wrong? But if he is not so strong, then he should go to the forest. Why should he live in Nairobi city? On the streets there are so many women. He'll walk on the streets closing his eyes? This is all rascaldom. They are rascals. >They are not devotees. Simply rascals. (Walk conversation 10/30.75) > >YS, >......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.