Guest guest Posted August 2, 2001 Report Share Posted August 2, 2001 Please accept my most humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! >Resorting to Criticizing something they don't understand or can't apply are >sometimes opted by the weak minded sense gratifiers who are trying to cover >up their possible own lack of determination to purify their senses, but >Krsna knows who's who. Very nasty. >Yet, watch out for saying, "Preaching" yet meaning--"I can't give up my >regulated sense gratification I'm getting from the temple-not even for one >month. Let us also watch out for becoming hard-hearted because of austerities and criticizing other devotees. And this also applies to the preachers. Now we are seeing a battle. The preachers are attacking the tapasvis, and the tapasvis are attacking the preachers. We need all kinds of people in our society. We need preachers in the field and tapasvis in the holy places. We need cooks in the temples and teachers in the schools and businessmen in the offices and so on. No one should think that he is the only one doing something valid and that the others are weak-minded sense gratifiers. Every service requires some kind of austerity, but when we think our own particular austerity makes us better than the others, then the benefits of our austerity are lost. >I do remember one brahmacari in 1976 in LA who did chaturmasya, but at the >end of it got married, so one devotee said sarcastically," Oh I understand, >the fruit of his austerities was to get a good wife." Naturally when >someone sees adverse things happening at the end of the vrata.... If he waited till Caturmasya was over before he married, where is the fault? Is there some regulation that one must wait a certain amount of time before marrying? And since when is marriage something adverse? It may not be for everyone, but it is still a Vaisnava asrama, and we have many wonderful householder devotees in our society. Your most humble servant, Umapati Swami Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2001 Report Share Posted August 3, 2001 At 07:27 AM 8/3/01 +0800, Umapati Swami wrote: >Please accept my most humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! > >>Resorting to Criticizing something they don't understand or can't apply >are >>sometimes opted by the weak minded sense gratifiers who are trying to >cover >>up their possible own lack of determination to purify their senses, but >>Krsna knows who's who. > >Very nasty. Thank you, Maharaj, for seeing to the heart of the matter, as always. There is a disturbing hint of self-righteousness in many of these comments. I'm grateful to Mahamantra for having posted the Purushottama vrata. I have some time to consider which items I, who am not a renouncer living in the Dhama, but an ordinary professional guy with aspirations for spiritual life, might be able to adopt. Fortunately, I have a month to consider which I will acutally be able to follow. The little vratas followed by ISKCON members (eschewing one class of foods each month) isn't particularly hard for me, except the upcoming one: yogurt. That is a real austerity for me. >Let us also watch out for becoming hard-hearted because of austerities and >criticizing other devotees. And this also applies to the preachers. Now >we are seeing a battle. The preachers are attacking the tapasvis, and the >tapasvis are attacking the preachers. Yes, thank you. Again, there are hints of a self-righteous party spirit we should by all means avoid. >We need all kinds of people in our society. We need preachers in the field >and tapasvis in the holy places. We need cooks in the temples and teachers >in the schools and businessmen in the offices and so on. No one should >think that he is the only one doing something valid and that the others >are weak-minded sense gratifiers. > >Every service requires some kind of austerity, but when we think our own >particular austerity makes us better than the others, then the benefits of >our austerity are lost. > >>I do remember one brahmacari in 1976 in LA who did chaturmasya, but at >the >>end of it got married, so one devotee said sarcastically," Oh I >understand, >>the fruit of his austerities was to get a good wife." Naturally when >>someone sees adverse things happening at the end of the vrata.... > >If he waited till Caturmasya was over before he married, where is the >fault? Is there some regulation that one must wait a certain amount of >time before marrying? And since when is marriage something adverse? It may >not be for everyone, but it is still a Vaisnava asrama, and we have many >wonderful householder devotees in our society. You want some tapasya? Try sticking to a marriage and raising kids. So manyof our society's problems can be traced to men (and women) who dump their spouses for a life of "renunciation" when the gloss wears off, or when things become difficult, or after a couple of kids have been born. I know that I'm a better person and a better disciple for having been married all these years. We both have struggled at times to bear each other's quirks and flaws. But we have been determined to try our best to do it right, to do right by our spiritual master, and to set a good example for our daughters. I know others who have been married even longer than we have, have seen evidence of their struggles--and triumphs. They are true vaishnavas, real tapasvis. Some of them have always been full-time preachers, others have been engaged sometimes in business or professional life for livelihood. Those of us who pine for the "good old days" may be intersted in what happens to this movement when these experienced men and women bring the experience of their family lives to the next stage of life. I'm convinced the good old days are yet to come. But it will be hindered by the kind of party spirit we tend to show, as well as by our proclivity to seek prestige, followers, and wealth. If we can actually learn to avoid these . . . watch out! Thanks again to Umapati Maharaj for his good sense and his good example. Your servant, Babhru das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2001 Report Share Posted August 6, 2001 In a message dated 8/2/01 11:00:42 PM EST, Babhru.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT) net writes: << Thank you, Maharaj, for seeing to the heart of the matter, as always. There is a disturbing hint of self-righteousness in many of these comments. >> Personal realizations or practices are not absolute. If it is good for one, it is not necessarily good for another. Thankfully, Krsna did not create us all the same. If we were all the same, it would be scary. Ys, Mahatma das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2001 Report Share Posted August 19, 2001 Dear Vaisnavas, Please accept my most humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! Babhru Prabhu writes: >You want some tapasya? Try sticking to a marriage and raising kids. Well said! I never had kids, but I know what a tapasya it is to make a marriage work. >So manyof our society's problems can be traced to men (and women) who dump >their spouses for a life of "renunciation" when the gloss wears off, or >when things become difficult, or after a couple of kids have been born. Srila Prabhupada writes: "These things cannot be taken so lightly, otherwise the whole thing will become a farce. Simply get married without considering what is the serious nature of married life, then if there is little disturbance, or if I do not like my wife or my husband, let me go away, everyone else is doing like that. So in this way the whole thing is becoming a farce." (letter to Madhukara) "We cannot imitate Krsna, but we can follow Krsna. We can follow His footsteps, how He was living. He was a grhastha. He was not a sannyasi. So our sannyasi is not very great credit. To remain grhastha, because we are going back to Godhead, back to home, the whole, our master, is grhastha. Not only grhastha, He has got so many wives. So to become sannyasi is not very great credit, according to our Vaisnava philosophy. To become perfect house-holder, that is credit. Perfect householder, like Krsna." (Tokyo, Apr 23, 1972) More: "Now you are a sannyasi, but do not think it is a great credit for you. It is easy to renounce. The ones performing austerities are the householders." (Srila Prabhupada to Sudama Swami after giving him sannyasa, as told by Sudama Swami to an audience of householders in LA around 1973.) "Just because no woman will have you, you think no one should get marrried." (Srila Prabhupada to Panca Dravida Swami as told by Panca Dravida Swami in a class at New Vrindaban.) I may not have the exact words for these quotes, but this is pretty close. Your most humble servant, Umapati Swami Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.