male form

[Guest guest]

Hare Krishna dear Prabhu.

Please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to Srila Prabhupada!

 

Your statement is correct, but it is already contained in the statement of

HH Bahkti Vikasa Swami. Difference between your statement and Maharaja's

statement is that your's is not complete, only one side is mentioned, where

Maharaja's is complete.

 

In other words there is no need for you to make such an incomplete statement

because it appears like you are commenting Maharaja's statement. That is

called an offence. Please be careful.

 

Your servant,

Mahat-tattva dasa

 

> Dear and respected Maharaja,

>

> PAMHO. AGTSP. AGTYH.

>

> In Kali Yuga, everybody is less intelligent, both men and women.

>

> In any yuga, society is divided according to guna and karma, whether man

> or woman.

>

> In any yuga, for bhakti there is no bar, of gender or social status.

>

> That is my understanding, from guru, sadhu and shastra.

>

> Your humble servant,

> Bhadra Govinda Dasa.

>

> >Social roles may change. But sastra states that the female form is

> >intrinsically less suited for spiritual realization than that of the

> >male. Although a generalization, it is an important one that sastra

> >repeatedly states. Along with the body goes a certain type of

> >consciousness. Women tend to be more attached to children, home, comfort,

> >security, bodily appearance(see the huge cosmetics section for women in

> >any large store), and to have less ability to distinguish between matter

> >and spirit. Therefore they are considered less intelligent. This does not

> >bar them from making advancement in bhakti, which depends more on the

> >mercy of the Lord and His devotees than on discriminatory power (but in

> >which discriminatory power is also important).