Guest guest Posted June 25, 2002 Report Share Posted June 25, 2002 > For clarification--I did *not* suggest that a divorced lawyer woman was > engaging in "desired" activities, but rather activities that are not in > accordance with her varna and ashrama at all. Desired activities, in either > the spiritual or external realm, are in accordance with one's general > categories of duties in that realm. Rather, I gave such a woman as an example > of someone whom we may not be able to engage externally in a way that would be > most conducive to hers and the society's welfare, but at least we can engage > her in spiritual duties, and help her to offer to external actions to Krsna in > whatever way possible. Hopefully we will raise our daughters so as to avoid > such situations. Dear Urmila, I beg your pardon. It still hasn't been established what "desired activity" means with regards to it being a subdivision of prescribed duty. You have presented it as being something a person wants to do that is not sinful, not whimsical, and that is in line with his or her psychophysical nature/varna. So, is "desired activity" something that clearly falls within one's occupational duty? You here explain the lawyer woman doing is not engaging in "desired activity". So what is the classification for such activity? Whimsical? Emergency? Is she performing vikarma? Is there a scriptural reference elaborating on desired activity the way it is briefly presented in the Gita? > As far as a woman's varna being determined by her father--there are many > places in the scripture where a man's varna is "determined" by birth, but > really these are simply cases where the person's quality corresponded to that > of the father, which is true for most people, especially in a society where > men and women of the same caste married each other and performed rituals to > attract a like-minded son or daughter. > > Yes, a woman *should* mold herself to her husband, and the parents should make > that easy by choosing a husband of the same varna. Especially a woman should > not marry a man of a lesser varna. So you are saying a woman's caste is not determined by her father or husband? In your paper on the topic of women and varnasrama, you write: "From studying Vedic marriage arrangements we learn that the qualities that distinguished a woman's varna existed before her marriage. The husband didn't determine a woman's varna. Rather, she married someone in the same varna in which she was naturally situated by quality and work. Devahuti, for example, "had good character and was well-qualified; therefore she was searching for a suitable husband just befitting her." (SB 3.22.9) A woman's varna could not be ascertained by that of her father (birth) because "one can become fit for a certain type of activity by qualification, not by birth." (SB 5.4.13) Would you please explain, with reference(s) from Srila Prabhupada's teachings, how a Vedic woman would have already been situated in the "work" or karma of a brahmana or ksatriya before marriage. Please also show how a girl's and woman's caste is anything other than her father's or husband's? Your servant, Sita dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.