Guest guest Posted October 31, 2002 Report Share Posted October 31, 2002 Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. > I agree with Hari Sauri prabhu's assessment: > > > ....This concoction of mantra he is propagating > > along with the "5 regulative principles" is to give himself some > > distinction among the Vaisnavas in the same way that a muni has to come > > up with a new philosophy in order to distinguish himself. > > but also with Krishna Candra's: > > > We all know that Sadhu Maharajas preaching is all on sastra. But now > > (just because of some contraversial statments) we just want to remove > > him from the conference. > > This is cowardly. > > My comment is, why not the conference moderator delay posting > 'controversial' texts to the conference until he gets other, qualified > opinion (if he is not able to immediately come to the correct conclusion > himself) on the contensious points? Can he not also edit texts -- > indicating at the beginning or the end or both -- that a text has been > edited, before posting it to the conference. Are these not the kind of > thing moderators are for? That sounds like a good strategy so I had our Sysop set up the Brahmacarya conference to work that way. Nothing will get posted with me approving of it. Thank you for your advice. The question now is should we invite Sadhu Swami to be part of a more securely moderated conference or remove him from the conference altogether. >From my prospective his domination of the conference with controversial views was the problem and that previewing of messages before posting could solve it. your servant, Krishna-kripa das moderator of Brahmacarya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.