Guest guest Posted May 31, 1999 Report Share Posted May 31, 1999 > If that is the case, there always will be different trends the science, > upholding their respective views. I am sure there are eager scholars for > debunking "Forbidden Archeology", but that doesn't mean that the material > presented there there is fraudulent. In the case of Dr.Bernard, his paper is probably looked upon as a rather outdated one by the scientists, being over 40 years old. Now they claim they have come up with scientifis evidences of the positive impact of sex on human health, and could easily debunk Dr.bernard on these grounds. Your servant, Madana-mohana das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.