Guest guest Posted February 19, 2000 Report Share Posted February 19, 2000 I have been following this debate, and feel that it's tending to go slightly 'over the top'. "Cleanliness is next to godliness" is an old and worthy saying. And I do understand the deeper spiritual and theological aspects of the preparation of food. Cleanliness in the kitchen is absolutely essential. But how is the necessary degree of cleanliness to be defined? I think what is being forgotten here is the nature of the material body. >From a clinical and epidemiological point of view, it is impossible and highly undesirable to try to isolate ourselves from the normal microbiological environment. Krishna has given us a brilliantly engineered immune system that MUST be used or "exercised" if it is to function and ultimately protect us. This may seem ironic or even like a dilemma, but we cannot survive unless our immune system comes into direct contact with the bacteria transmitted by other people. That is its purpose. Clinical and empirical medical investigation have proved over and over that it is exactly those people who try to excessively "protect" themselves from disease who get sick the most! In other words: the more we try to protect ourselves from infection, the more we get infected. We could even carry this a philosophical step further and say that Krishna gave us the immune system for a reason, and by not using it as it was intended, we are not adhering to His plan. This is perhaps speculation on my part, I admit. Others will surely disagree. I do not wish to offend, but only to offer a new dimension to this discussion for your consideration. YS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.