Govindaji's mahaprasadam sponsored by prostitute not for the

[Guest guest]

> > It seems

> > to me a bit philosophically incorrect. If Lord Krishna accepts

> > prasadam, Srila Prabhupada says He replaces the bhoga with

> > transcendental food - so how could it have anything to do with the

> > offered food? Krishna either accepts or he doesn't - how could he say >

> "Although I have eaten the bhoga, my remnants contain the prostitutes >

> sins."

>

> I wouldn't declare it wacky, but it does seem a bit dubious. I

> too would definitely like to hear an answer to such an important question.

> Can anyone explain how prasada can by all appearances become so

> contaminated? Or did Krishna not eat what He personally asked for?

> Perhaps the person who originally posted this story can explain more.

 

Just a thought that came to my mind: how the maha-prasadam can get spoiled

if it becomes transcendental after Lord Krishna relishes it? Possibly, the

same logic can be applied in the above case: in the material world nothing

can escape the laws of nature, which are also set by the Lord. So it is His

arrangement that even the maha-prasadam can be somewhat "contaminated"...

Anyway, it's just my speculation.

 

Ys, Gauri das