Guest guest Posted February 28, 2000 Report Share Posted February 28, 2000 > It is clear enough that Narayana Maharaja differs greatly from Srila > Prabhupada, but the deviation is explained away by claiming that > Prabhupada was, in effect, a lower-level guru (a teacher of vaidhi-bhakti > only) while Narayana Maharaja is a higher-level guru (a giver of > raga-marga). What does this foolish unfounded criticizm has to do with Krsna Katha? In fact, Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja states just the opposite. Just read his commentary on Srila Prabhupada's "Nectar of Instruction" called "The Essence of All Advice". Please stop posting such aparadhas in this forum. We have seen enough devotees falling down because of hearing and repeating such things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2000 Report Share Posted February 29, 2000 Pandava Vijaya wrote: > One more thing...I personally did not make one single comment on this deal > I posted. I just thought it was well stated by Ravindra Svarupa, Well, I just think that what Ravindra Svarupa wrote about Narayana Maharaja applies well to the ISKCON guru lineage, of which Ravindra is a member. And in any case the Krsna Katha conference is not the place to post that garbage. YS RK Mex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.