Guest guest Posted May 14, 2000 Report Share Posted May 14, 2000 Dear Devotees, Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. Rukmini Dvadasi, the all-auspicious appearance day of Lord Krishna's foremost queen, Rukmini, is at hand, and I wanted to upload a poem I wrote for this occasion last year. I hope you find it pleasing to your transcendental senses because it reminds one of Lord Krishna qualities pastimes. Please forgive me for the many defects in its composition. It is both as the text of this e-mail and as a Word for Windows file with diacritics. your servant, Krishna-kripa das ---- Talks Between Lord Krishna and Rukmini (written by Krishna-kripa das, based on Srila Prabhupada’s Krishna, for Rukmini Dvadasi 1999) Krishna, the best of all persons, Gives knowledge to both great and small. Sitting on Rukmini’s bedstead, The Lord was served by one and all. Acting as the perfect husband, He showed His supreme perfection, Though beyond the mind’s concoction, He'd come to protect religion. Rukmini’s beauty was striking, Though her grown sons proved her quite old. Wishing to cool Krishna’s body, She grasped the fan’s handle of gold. A golden necklace and earrings Enhanced her beautiful face. Her ankle bells tinkled softly As she fanned Lord Krishna with grace. Rukmini and Krishna’s pastimes Are full of endless opulence, While those of Radha and Krishna Have a simple, rural, essence. Surrounded by costly jewels, Blooming flowers, and fine incense, Krishna enjoyed in the palace Accepting service from His servants. Rukmini’s characteristics, Appearing unusually bright, Along with her fine behavior, Gave her Lord Krishna great delight. Once a sage gave her a flower, Her co-wife demanded the tree. Rukmini, happy in service, Remained simple and envy-free. Krishna likes to joke with His wives, And to provoke His queen’s anger, Addressing her as the princess, He praised her former suitor. "Sishupala is most exalted. I’m nothing in comparison. You’re beautiful, sober, and grave. How did you made your decision? "Out of fear of Jarasandha, I built this city in the sea. I, by fighting with many kings, Made all inimical to Me. "Once I killed My uncle Kamsa, Yet for his throne I had no right, It was meant for Ugrasena, Although I won it in My fight. "Some say I’m just a cowherd boy, While others claim that I’m a prince. Some think I’m just a vagabond, And even others have no hints. "I am not a polished husband. I should be happy with one wife. But, instead, I married thousands, And always cause them endless strife. "Women, who are attached to Me, Certainly lead a life of grief. Radharani and the gopis Cry day and night without relief. "It is bad enough I’m heartless, And yet I am a pauper, too. Though tending Nanda’s many cows, I did not own even a few. "Having had nothing in My past, Why lament I have nothing now. For even My dear devotees Have almost nothing, anyhow. "All these things considered, My dear. You made a terrible mistake! Better you find a qualified prince, And give Me up for your own sake!" Such shocking words from Lord Krishna, To Rukmini, seemed quite insane. Fearing her Lord’s separation. She felt ever increasing pain. Asking her to marry another, He said He loved her not at all. He married her just to chastise Demonic kings like Sishupala. "I know You've always loved Me, But I care not for home and wife, And neither do My devotees. Self-knowledge is our goal of life." Krishna’s speech suddenly stopped. Rukmini began to reflect, Concluding because of her pride, Krishna spoke such words of neglect. Those words of uncommon harshness, Convinced her that Krishna might go, Crying torrents of anxious tears, She scratched the floor with her toe. Choked with tears, she couldn’t speak. Her mind confused with anxiety, She fell unconscious to the ground, As wind blows down a banana tree. Seeing Rukmini’s reaction To the words He’d spoken in jest, Krishna raised Her up with His hands, And then embraced her to His chest. Krishna, who’s expert in speaking, To servants blessed with devotion, Retracting his former statements, Spoke to remove her confusion: "O daughter of King Vidarbha! O beloved! Please understand! The words I spoke were not truthful. They were part of a joke I’d planned. "I thought you’d speak chastising words, With your angry, but charming face. But you took Me seriously, Never dreamed that would be the case. "As householders we are busy With our duties throughout the day. Thus We long for time together During which to joke and to play." Hearing the sweet words of Krishna Rukmini ceased being fearful. Seeing that Krishna was joking, Smiling, her face became cheerful. "My dear lotus-eyed Lord Krishna You’re right, I’m no fit match for You. Master of all good qualities, You do what no other can do. "Fearing the kings ruling this world, You say that You hid in the sea. Here the modes of nature are kings, But as Supersoul, You are free. "You say You hate these worldly kings, But what are the kings of these lands. I think in truth the senses are kings, And yet You can curb their demands. "You say You’ve no worldly power, And Your servants have none as well. That is a sign of Your wisdom. For worldly might leads one to hell. "You say You live without purpose, And Your servants are aimless too. People think You’re mysterious. Yet all opulence rests in You. "You say that You’re impoverished, But what is that poor condition? Since You Yourself are everything, You have no other possession! "You say rich men don’t care for You, And I certainly must agree. Due to planning for sense pleasure Their spiritual urges flee. "But those having no possessions, Are exclusively dear to You, And for those renounced devotees Your Lordship is the most dear, too. "You say partners in a marriage Should have many traits the same. But You're the source of opulence Like beauty, wisdom, wealth, and fame. "Those persons who have good motives Desire nothing other than You. And thus they give up everything, And become worthy to meet You, too. "In Your servants’ society, The pale pleasures of lust aren’t missed, For when You are in the center Does real happiness exist. "You say only beggars praise You, But exalted beggars they are. Forgiving the worst offenders, They glorify You near and far. "O my dear, beloved husband, In choosing You, I’m not naive. I accepted Your lotus feet Following these saints whom I believe. "You claim that You are penniless, And I can see how that is true. You give Yourself in charity To those who give themselves to You. "O, in Your form as time itself, Who can withstand Your mighty slugs, Compared to Your awesome power, Other princes are just like bugs. "You say You hid in the ocean Out of fear of these rulers of men, And yet, You bravely kidnapped me, And taught those princes a lesson. "My Lord, how is it that You say Your surrendered souls are sad. Giving up false pleasures for You, Your servants are certainly glad. "According to past fruitive acts, You can throw me in any species. I just want attachment for You, Who give Yourself to devotees. "You asked me to choose another prince, But what’s their real position? Dishonored dogs, miserly cats, And hard-working beasts of burden. "Women who don’t know Your glories May choose one of those other men, And yet I desire You alone, Who are praised from here to heaven. "A man in this world of matter Is a bag of mucus and stool. A woman who loves such a man Is certainly an outright fool. "O Lord, You are self-satisfied, And indifferent to beauty, too. Whether You care for me or not, I just want devotion for You. "Passion’s mode is Your creation, Thus Your glance in a passionate way Fulfills all my heart’s ambitions, For such auspicious times I pray." "O My dear chaste wife, I desired Such a perfect explanation, In response to My joking words; I approve your presentation. "O most beautiful Rukmini, I’m pleased by your great love for Me. Thus I’m always at your service, Whatever you desire shall be. All My dearmost friends and servants Are free from contamination. If they do ask Me for something It is a source of liberation. "O, chaste and pious, Rukmini, I have tested your love for Me. You’ve passed My examination, Having done most successfully. "I have tried to make you angry By speaking insults all untrue, However to My great surprise, I saw pure love abide in You. "I’m the source of benedictions, Up to that of liberation, But fools ask for money and sex And remain in tribulation. "Sex pleasure can be had by hogs, A most degraded form of life, Why should the foolish people then, Worship Me to attain such strife. "O, foremost of My many queens, You have no false motivation. I see you just want to serve Me, And you do so without cessation. "Pure service frees from matter’s bonds And leads one to Godhead, our home. The polluted just make a show, So again in this world must roam. "Although I have thousands of wives, Your love surpasses any queen. Hearing My glories, stole your heart, Yet My form you had never seen. "Ignoring rich and famous princes Insisting on marrying Me, You prayed that I would kidnap You, Confident of My victory. "When I came to take you away, Your poor brother tried to fight Me. Mercilessly defeating him, I disfigured Rukmi’s body, "During Aniruddha’s marriage And while disputing who was right, My brother, angry with Rukmi, Finally killed him in a fight. "Silently you suffered, O queen, Fearing separation from Me. And by this glorious silence, You bought Me for eternity. "A brahman came with your request ‘O, Lord Krishna, please come take me.’ And when delayed in his return, You felt the whole world was empty. "You thought Your beautiful body Should be touched by no one but Me, And thinking that I was not coming, Wished to die immediately. "O best of My queens, Rukmini, Your love is unforgettable, And for Me to repay such love. I think is just not possible." Lord Krishna at no time requires To be a husband or a son, The Lord, because He is complete, Doesn’t need help from anyone. Adventing Himself, He plays roles, For devotees’ satisfaction, Showing, as Rukmini’s husband, Conjugal love in perfection. O Krishna, You are glorious; Rukmini’s love for You, sublime. Please let us recall Your pastimes >From now until the end of time. Your pastimes break our karmic bonds, And end our material lust. For souls looking for love of God, Hearing Your pastimes is a must. Goddess of fortune, Rukmini, Upon this most auspicious day, Bless us with pure love for Krishna! For devotion like yours we pray! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 Hare krishna pamho agtsp! i am puzzled by something and beg the devotees kind views on this. Often we see it said that Rukmini is the "foremost queen" (pls see below) of Lord Krishna. Therefore I had been under the impression that she was the expansion of Radharani. But my recent post on this forum asking about Rukmini and Satyabhama's position was answered by learned devotees that Rukmini is Candravali's expansion and Satyabhama is Radharanis. I was puzzled further because I do recall (if someone cd kindly check on Folio in CC I think it is mentioned perhaps in connection with Gadadhara Prabhu's fainting when Mahaprabhu teased him) that in the pancha-tattva, Sri Gadaadhara Pandit who is the internal potency of the lord was an incarnation of Rukmini. Elsewhere I recall seeing that Sri Gadadhara is incarnation of Radharani. That is why I had thought Rukmini was Radharani's expansion. I also understand that there is a lila of one of the six goswamis ( was he Sri Gopal Bhatta or Sri Raghunatha Das?) who once angrily threw away some prasadam offered him because the leaf cup was from Candravalli's kunja. So I would like to learn more about these points. Is Sri Gadadhara prabhu expansion of Radharani or Rukmini or both? Perhaps my memory is rusty, so if some kind devotee who has folio might check, perhaps some references might clarify the facts first. Thank you for your attention. yrs in service dina Krsna-krpa.SDG (AT) pamho (DOT) net [Krsna-krpa.SDG (AT) pamho (DOT) net] Sunday, May 14, 2000 10:36 AM (Krsna) Katha; (Devotee) Writers Group Talks Between Lord Krishna and Rukmini Dear Devotees, Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. Rukmini Dvadasi, the all-auspicious appearance day of Lord Krishna's foremost queen, Rukmini, is at hand, and I wanted to upload a poem I wrote for this occasion last year. I hope you find it pleasing to your transcendental senses because it reminds one of Lord Krishna qualities pastimes. Please forgive me for the many defects in its composition. It is both as the text of this e-mail and as a Word for Windows file with diacritics. your servant, Krishna-kripa das ---- Talks Between Lord Krishna and Rukmini (written by Krishna-kripa das, based on Srila Prabhupada's Krishna, for Rukmini Dvadasi 1999) Krishna, the best of all persons, Gives knowledge to both great and small. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 Haribol, This is what I read in a book of H.G. Satyaraja prabhu. Sri Panca Tattva - The Five Features of God 5.15 page 126 In Narottama Dasa's Prarthana, Radha is depicted as praying for a male body so She could always remain with Krsna without the fear of being scolded by elders and respectable members of society. This desire had to find an avenue for fulfillment and did, ultimately, take place in Gauranga lila. Sri Gadadhara Pandita page 127. 5.19 "This was all reconciled theologically by acknowledging Sri Radha's different moods, i.e., Mahaprabhu is Radha in the mood of separation, Gadadhara is Radha in the mood of Rukmini, Jagadananda Pandita is Radha, too, in still another mood, ad infinitum. Kavi Karnapura ultimately concedes, too, that Gadadhara is Radha, and he states it quite clearly in Guara-ganoddesa-dipika (which was written after the Caitanya-candrodaya-nataka, where his initial ideas about Gadadhara can be found). In this later work, Karnapura makes conclusive statements about the original Vrindavana identities of the various devotees in Caitanya lila. He is unequivocal about Gadadhara Pandita: "She who was previously prema incarnate, the goddess of Vrindavan -- known to all as Sri Radha -- is Gadadhara, the beloved of Gaura, who bears the title 'Pandita'. Svarupa Damodara declared him to be the goddess of fortune (Laksmi) of Vraja. She who was previously the goddess of fortune in Vrindavana, the beloved of Syamasundara (Krsna), is now the goddess of fortune for Gaura, Gadadhara is both Lalita and Sri Radha, but with special emphasis on Radha side of his nature. This Radha bhava of Gadadhara Pandita became famous in Puri, where he spent a good portion of his manifest pastimes." I hope this helps. Your servant, Vinod-bihari dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 Thank you very much prabhu Another question: Is it therefore correct to address Srimati Rukmini Devi as the "Foremost Queen" or is that title more appropriately applied to Srimati Satyabhama Devi then? yr servant dina Vinod-Bihari.BCS (AT) pamho (DOT) net [Vinod-Bihari.BCS (AT) pamho (DOT) net] Monday, May 15, 2000 2:10 PM Dina-Anukampana Dasa RE: Talks Between Lord Krishna and Rukmini Haribol, This is what I read in a book of H.G. Satyaraja prabhu. Sri Panca Tattva - The Five Features of God 5.15 page 126 In Narottama Dasa's Prarthana, Radha is depicted as praying for a male body so She could always remain with Krsna without the fear of being scolded by elders and respectable members of society. This desire had to find an avenue for fulfillment and did, ultimately, take place in Gauranga lila. Sri Gadadhara Pandita page 127. 5.19 "This was all reconciled theologically by acknowledging Sri Radha's different moods, i.e., Mahaprabhu is Radha in the mood of separation, Gadadhara is Radha in the mood of Rukmini, Jagadananda Pandita is Radha, too, in still another mood, ad infinitum. Kavi Karnapura ultimately concedes, too, that Gadadhara is Radha, and he states it quite clearly in Guara-ganoddesa-dipika (which was written after the Caitanya-candrodaya-nataka, where his initial ideas about Gadadhara can be found). In this later work, Karnapura makes conclusive statements about the original Vrindavana identities of the various devotees in Caitanya lila. He is unequivocal about Gadadhara Pandita: "She who was previously prema incarnate, the goddess of Vrindavan -- known to all as Sri Radha -- is Gadadhara, the beloved of Gaura, who bears the title 'Pandita'. Svarupa Damodara declared him to be the goddess of fortune (Laksmi) of Vraja. She who was previously the goddess of fortune in Vrindavana, the beloved of Syamasundara (Krsna), is now the goddess of fortune for Gaura, Gadadhara is both Lalita and Sri Radha, but with special emphasis on Radha side of his nature. This Radha bhava of Gadadhara Pandita became famous in Puri, where he spent a good portion of his manifest pastimes." I hope this helps. Your servant, Vinod-bihari dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 Hare Krishna, PAMHO. AGTSP AND ISKCON. On 15 May 2000, Dina-Anukampana Dasa wrote: > Hare krishna > > pamho agtsp! > I also understand that there is a lila of one of the six goswamis ( was he > Sri Gopal Bhatta or Sri Raghunatha Das?) who once angrily threw away some > prasadam offered him because the leaf cup was from Candravalli's kunja. I think it is Bhakti Vinod Thakur and not one of the 6 Goswamis, in this pastime. (I remember He himself mentions this in Saranagathi or Gitavali). In Gaura Ganoddhesa Dipika I remember it is mentioned: Chandravali's expansion is Sadashiva Kaviraja, and Rukmini's expansion is Lakshmi Priya, Vishnupriya is Bhudevi's expansion, Gadadhara Pandita is Radha Rani's expansion, Satyabhama's expansion is Jagadananda Pandita. Also it is mentioned in some places that Advaita Acarya is Maha Vishnu and in other places He is Sadashiva. This is something that came to my mind immediately. Maybe some devotees can mention more details. Your humble servant, Bhadra Govinda Das. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 > > I also understand that there is a lila of one of the six goswamis ( was > > he Sri Gopal Bhatta or Sri Raghunatha Das?) who once angrily threw away > > some prasadam offered him because the leaf cup was from Candravalli's > > kunja. > > I think it is Bhakti Vinod Thakur and not one of the 6 Goswamis, in this > pastime. (I remember He himself mentions this in Saranagathi or Gitavali). This prasadam was buttermilk in a leafcup from Sakhishthali and the acarya was Srila Raghunatha das Goswami at his bhajan kutir at Sri Radha-kunda. At this place, Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakur also resided and has his bhajan-kutir next to that of Raghunatha das Goswami. Your servant, Nayana-ranjana das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 > Thank you very much prabhu > > Another question: Is it therefore correct to address Srimati Rukmini Devi > as the "Foremost Queen" or is that title more appropriately applied to > Srimati Satyabhama Devi then? I had no idea that phrase was so controversial. If one searches Folio for two words 'principal' and 'queen', one finds that Srila Prabhupada says: "Rukmini, the principal queen of Lord Krishna, was the daughter of the King of Vidarbha, who wished that his qualified and beautiful daughter be given away to Lord Krishna." SB 1.10.29 purport "Pradyumna: Incarnation of Kamadeva or, according to others, incarnation of Sanat-kumara, born as the son of the Personality of Godhead Lord Sri Krishna and Laksmidevi Srimati Rukmini, the principal queen at Dvaraka." SB 1.11.16-17 purport "It is already known to us that Krishna had 16,108 wives. All these wives were exalted liberated souls, and among them Queen Rukmini was the chief." KB Chapter 90 He also refers to Krishna's eight principal queens which includes Srimati Satyabhama Devi as well as Srimati Rukmini Devi, but when there is a question of one principal queen, she is Srimati Rukmini Devi. your servant, Krishna-kripa das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2000 Report Share Posted May 15, 2000 In a message dated 5/14/00 11:20:31 PM Central Daylight Time, dinaanu (AT) com (DOT) org writes: << ara Pandit who is the internal potency of the lord was an incarnation of Rukmini. Elsewhere I recall seeing that Sri Gadadhara is incarnation of Radharani. That is why I had thought Rukmini was Radharani's expansion. >> PAMHO AGT Srila Prabhupada Dina prabhu: Here is a quick answer to one of your queries: Gadadahara is considered to be an incarnation of Radhika's bodily luster: "About eight or ten miles from Calcutta, on the banks of the Ganges, is a village known as Eìòiyädaha-gräma. Çréla Gadädhara däsa was known as an inhabitant of this village (eìòiyädaha-väsé gadädhara däsa). The Bhakti-ratnäkara (Seventh Wave), informs us that after the disappearance of Lord Caitanya Mahäprabhu, Gadädhara däsa went from Navadvépa to Katwa. Thereafter he came to Eìòiyädaha and resided there. He is stated to be the luster of the body of Çrématé Rädhäräëé, just as Çréla Gadädhara Paëòita Gosvämé is an incarnation of Çrématé Rädhäräëé Herself. Caitanya Mahäprabhu is sometimes explained to be rädhä-bhäva-dyuti-suvalita, or characterized by the emotions and bodily luster of Çrématé Rädhäräëé. Gadädhara däsa is this dyuti, or luster. In the Gaura-gaëoddeça-dépikä (154) he is described to be an expansion of the potency of Çrématé Rädhäräëé." CC, Adi 10:53 purport. Does anyone know how to convert Folio Scagoudy font into normal text fonts so it doesn't appear as above? I guess it would be a matter of getting this font into the windows font folder? YFS, Jayo dasa PS Dina, what do you hear about BS Damodara's Maharaja's activities, travel plans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2000 Report Share Posted May 16, 2000 Dear Krsna Krpa Prabhu Thank you for your comments. I do not think it is controversial, but rather we are used to hearing that Radharani is most important and dear to Krishna, not Candravali. Hence we find it contradictory that Satyabhama's position (as expansion of Radharani) in Dwaraka lila is not as prominent as Rukmini's (although she is Candravali's expansion). I suppose that is why I had always (up till this recent discussion on COM which has enlightened me) presumed that Rukmini (being more prominent as the principal queen) was actually Radha's expansion but devotees have posted msgs showing the reverse to be the truth. I think from tattva point of view, this is exceptionally important, so pardon me please if you think we are trying to create controvesy - it was honestly not my intention. If so many devotees are posting msgs it is because we all want to learn about this important topic. If any kind souls can shed further light on this, I wd be very much obliged, to learn from the assembled devotees any other hidden reasons for Rukmini's (Candravali's) prominence over Satyabhama (Radha's) position in Dwaraka. Thank you very much. yours in service dina Krsna-krpa.SDG (AT) pamho (DOT) net [Krsna-krpa.SDG (AT) pamho (DOT) net] Tuesday, May 16, 2000 2:32 AM Dina-Anukampana Dasa; Vinod-Bihari (das) BCS (Den Haag - NL) Cc: Dvarkadhisa (das) IDS (Krakow - PL) RE: Talks Between Lord Krishna and Rukmini > Thank you very much prabhu > > Another question: Is it therefore correct to address Srimati Rukmini Devi > as the "Foremost Queen" or is that title more appropriately applied to > Srimati Satyabhama Devi then? I had no idea that phrase was so controversial. If one searches Folio for two words 'principal' and 'queen', one finds that Srila Prabhupada says: "Rukmini, the principal queen of Lord Krishna, was the daughter of the King of Vidarbha, who wished that his qualified and beautiful daughter be given away to Lord Krishna." SB 1.10.29 purport "Pradyumna: Incarnation of Kamadeva or, according to others, incarnation of Sanat-kumara, born as the son of the Personality of Godhead Lord Sri Krishna and Laksmidevi Srimati Rukmini, the principal queen at Dvaraka." SB 1.11.16-17 purport "It is already known to us that Krishna had 16,108 wives. All these wives were exalted liberated souls, and among them Queen Rukmini was the chief." KB Chapter 90 He also refers to Krishna's eight principal queens which includes Srimati Satyabhama Devi as well as Srimati Rukmini Devi, but when there is a question of one principal queen, she is Srimati Rukmini Devi. your servant, Krishna-kripa das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2000 Report Share Posted May 16, 2000 Regarding Sayabhama, maybe text from bh. Jan can also help.... > Text COM:2208655 (22 lines) > (Bhakta) Jan Mares (NE-BBT Czech) > 04-Apr-99 17:09 > (Krsna) Katha [2204] > About Satyabhama devi > --------------------------- > There is a story from Padma Purana about Devasharma and Candrasharma. > There was a bramana named Devasharma, who had one daughter named Gunavati > and one disciple called Candrasharma. He married his daughter to > Candrasharma and lived together with him in Haridwar, which is considered > as Visnu-ksetra. One day they went to the forest to collect some wood for > the sacrifice when one demon came and killed both of them. They went to > Vaikuntha and because they were both worshipers of the sun god, later on > Devasharma became Satrajit and Candrasharma became Akrura. Satrajit had > the Syamantaka-mani from the sun god whom he worshiped in his last life, > and Akrura was his friend because of that, and he also had the Syamantaka > jewel for some time. After that Gunavati worshiped Lord Visnu for the rest > of her life. > > When she was very old one day she went to take a bath, fell down in the > river and died. At that time she was carried to Vaikuntha because she had > performed Ekadasi vrata her whole life, worshiped Lord Visnu and Tulasi > Devi. Therefore she got the chance of becoming Satyabhama, the daughter of > Satrajit who was her father in the previous life. > > Satyabhama asked Krsna, 'How did I get the chance to become Your wife? > What did I do in my past life?' So Lord Krsna was narrating this story. > They were very religious all their life and they died in Haridwar so they > went to Lord Hari's planet - not because of their worship of Surya. > (Text COM:2208655) -------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.