Guest guest Posted September 1, 2000 Report Share Posted September 1, 2000 > At 8:42 -0400 8/11/2000, Madhava Gosh (das) ACBSP (New Vrindavan - USA) > wrote: > > > Why is he allowed to do anything on this case? In the US child > > > molesters are not allowed to do anything signifigant. Why are out > >standards less than > > > the so called"meat-eating karmis"? > > > >While I don't disagree with your sentiment in general, bear in mind that > >two of those standards are "innocent until proven guilty" and "beyond a > >reasonable doubt", two standards that do put a lot of restraint on > >action. > > According to the judgement issued by the OCP, Satadhanya has admitted to > at least some of the charges against him, incl. having had sex with a > minor, which does make him a child molester. From what I understand, he as > also written at least one letter of apology to a victim and provided some > money for counseling. However, I do not know about his compliance with all > the other parts of his sentence. > > Ys, > Madhusudani dasi I am interested in your definition of child molestor. The cases of which the CPO have had before them in regards to Satadhanya's sexual behaviours with minors clearly define him as an agressive perpetrator and not one of mutual agreeance between himself and those of his victims. Being familiar with the case and one of his victims we should be so quick to think lightly of his actions. y.s Visnupriya-devi dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.