Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! In your last text you claimed that if it was not Krishna’s plan to have Srila Prabhupada become the sole diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966, then Srila Prabhupada would not have been a bona fide spiritual master. Can you please prove that. Especially, please prove that if it was Krishna plan to have multiple diksa gurus for ISKCON in 1966 with Srila Prabhupada as one of them, then Srila Prabhupada would not have been a bona fide spiritual master. Or please prove that if it was not Krishna’s plan to have Srila Prabhupada become the sole diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966, then it was not Krishna's plan either to have multiple diksa gurus for ISKCON in 1966 with Srila Prabhupada as one of them. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.