Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Respected member, Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow called Jupiter. Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some really good things to offer as well. Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to Rahu. In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say. Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. That is how the world is. However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that is definitely an issue. Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the combination is not the best of things to happen individually. However, when you take lordships this may take a completely different turn. BTW, I have this yoga. Thanks Souvik vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego wrote: > > > > Friends, > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of the place he occupies. > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta Hai. > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Namaskar Bharatji, I have always admired your posts... As always I could not agree any more Regards, Souvik vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology" <hinduastrology wrote: > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature that is > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and can it > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many because it > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality, dharma, > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society, > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one needs it. Now > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. However, when it > comes to Spirituality: > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the society. > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad things. So for > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a role in > Spirituality: > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking honor and > respect in society. > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring a balance > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take the Middle > Path". > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > Thanks and Regards > Bharat > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan wrote: > > > > Respected member, > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > called Jupiter. > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to > > Rahu. > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say. > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that > > is definitely an issue. > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > different turn. > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > Thanks > > > > Souvik > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta > > Hai. > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will reply back.. Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that limitation is "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, Rahu alone cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the dwandhas - Pairs of opposites like: 1. Likes -Dislikes 2. Honour -Dishonour 3. Future - Past 4. Hapiness - Sorrow and so on and on and on..... Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the space. It is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given name. It is dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and Anantam. Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. Infact, it is the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is Satya in the form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can shock us into our senses. Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we need the energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with the viveka and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as Atmabala, Moon for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in this, if only we were to will it. The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also releases us due to the same Lord. Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a particular trait of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. The whole nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but MahaMaya. It is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature amounts to non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the one who accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, the destiny and grahas remain only namesake for the body. Thanks and Regards Bharat On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego > wrote: > > Dear friend, > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed because > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of Moon as my > arguing point) > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South magnatic > force which always exists in universe. > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal yog ? > > Tatvam-Asi > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be starting > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan > wrote: > Namaskar Bharatji, > > I have always admired your posts... > > As always I could not agree any more > > Regards, > > Souvik > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology" > <hinduastrology wrote: > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature > that is > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and > can it > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many > because it > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality, > dharma, > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society, > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one > needs it. Now > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > However, when it > > comes to Spirituality: > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > society. > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > things. So for > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a > role in > > Spirituality: > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking > honor and > > respect in society. > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring > a balance > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take > the Middle > > Path". > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Bharat > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan wrote: > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > is > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of > what it > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > to > > > Rahu. > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > and > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > say. > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > mentality > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > is > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > that > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > different turn. > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > destroyer of > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > Karta > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 dear friends guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam ji too knows that they are far from truth. when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all planets. however, let me put my own understanding: 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status and they are not planets. 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are not reckoned) 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either for rasi or bhava. 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they can project even the worst negative results in a positive language. for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land. anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful presentation of negative things. truly rahu is known for deceit. with best wishes pandit arjun vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego wrote: > > Prafulla ji, > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail, please let me know. I will send it to you. > > Tatvam-Asi > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions wrote: > Sir > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > regards / Prafulla > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > Good to read your views. > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one for me) > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number 142. > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will > reply back. > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > limitation is > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, Rahu > alone > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the dwandhas - > Pairs of > > opposites like: > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > 3. Future - Past > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the > space. It > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given name. > It is > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and Anantam. > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > Infact, it is > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is Satya in the > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can > shock us > > into our senses. > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we > need the > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with the > viveka > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > Atmabala, Moon > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in > this, if > > only we were to will it. > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also > releases > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > particular trait > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. The whole > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > MahaMaya. It > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature amounts to > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the > one who > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, the > destiny > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed > because > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of Moon as my > > > arguing point) > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South > magnatic > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal yog ? > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be starting > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology" > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature > > > that is > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and > > > can it > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many > > > because it > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality, > > > dharma, > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society, > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one > > > needs it. Now > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > However, when it > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > > society. > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > things. So for > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a > > > role in > > > > Spirituality: > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking > > > honor and > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring > > > a balance > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take > > > the Middle > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > > > is > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of > > > what it > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > > > to > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > > > and > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > > > mentality > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > > > is > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > > > that > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > destroyer of > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > > > Karta > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Arjun ji, You stick to your thinking and I will stick to mine. Ttavam-Asi About Shaankaracharya of Kanchi, his chart has been discussed and I have already posted my reading on him. panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 > wrote: dear friends guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam ji too knows that they are far from truth. when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all planets. however, let me put my own understanding: 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status and they are not planets. 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are not reckoned) 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either for rasi or bhava. 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they can project even the worst negative results in a positive language. for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land. anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful presentation of negative things. truly rahu is known for deceit. with best wishes pandit arjun vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego wrote: > > Prafulla ji, > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail, please let me know. I will send it to you. > > Tatvam-Asi > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions wrote: > Sir > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > regards / Prafulla > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > Good to read your views. > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one for me) > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number 142. > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will > reply back. > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > limitation is > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, Rahu > alone > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the dwandhas - > Pairs of > > opposites like: > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > 3. Future - Past > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the > space. It > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given name. > It is > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and Anantam. > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > Infact, it is > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is Satya in the > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can > shock us > > into our senses. > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we > need the > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with the > viveka > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > Atmabala, Moon > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in > this, if > > only we were to will it. > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also > releases > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > particular trait > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. The whole > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > MahaMaya. It > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature amounts to > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the > one who > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, the > destiny > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed > because > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of Moon as my > > > arguing point) > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South > magnatic > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal yog ? > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be starting > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology" > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature > > > that is > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and > > > can it > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many > > > because it > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality, > > > dharma, > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society, > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one > > > needs it. Now > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > However, when it > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > > society. > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > things. So for > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a > > > role in > > > > Spirituality: > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking > > > honor and > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring > > > a balance > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take > > > the Middle > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > > > is > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of > > > what it > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > > > to > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > > > and > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > > > mentality > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > > > is > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > > > that > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > destroyer of > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > > > Karta > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Pandit Arjun ji Let me clarify you, I am not for / against Jupiter. But did you find it giving "big" materialistic results? I have not yet. In lighter note ( no offence), traditionally - astrology is taught, read and practised by Brahmin (satvik people) ruled by guru. If it is dhankarka, how many of them have become millionaire, in current times. Guru is often considered as dhan karka. In old days, wealth was knowledge / "gyan". Kings used to respect and gift tangible/ intangible assets to learned pandits etc. and anyone, who was learned used to have such blessings from society and kingdoms. So guru was rightly called dhan karka and guru dasha was hailed as the best possible dasha on the planet. Now the dynamics have changed in current yuga, and guru (no doubt it is somya and satvik ) often fails to deliver materialistic success. In modern technology age (even from industrial age), knowledge has no role for wealth. and materialistic results can be seen only from the other significators. Guru can be one of the factor for an individual success, but can never be candidate for final say. Coming to guru chandala yoga (guru / rahu together) will render excellent materialistic results, for gyan now guided by rahu (moden yuga's ground rules - ambitions, big plans, growth, manipulation, competitive fierceness). Coming to another interesting observation - whenever transit rahu is over guru and if at the same time transit guru over rahu - the native faces very difficult times in terms of the materialistic pursuits. While reading so many charts, I observed (members may share their experience) - -venus, saturn, rahu renders much more wealth than guru -8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th house -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be critical for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house" there can be long list, which we may arrive at..and planets need to be seen from current yuga's perspective. I repeat, no one factor will ever result an event, but when we want to mark the main candidate for a result, watch out - jupiter is not geared for materialistic and competitive pursuits. regards / Prafulla vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004" <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam > ji too knows that they are far from truth. > > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. > > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all > planets. however, let me put my own understanding: > > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. > > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status > and they are not planets. > > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are > not reckoned) > > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either > for rasi or bhava. > > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they > can project even the worst negative results in a positive language. > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land. > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful > presentation of negative things. > > truly rahu is known for deceit. > > with best wishes > pandit arjun > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > wrote: > > > > Prafulla ji, > > > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail, > please let me know. I will send it to you. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > Sir > > > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > > > regards / Prafulla > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > wrote: > > > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > > Good to read your views. > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one > for me) > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number > 142. > > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will > > reply back. > > > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > > limitation is > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, > Rahu > > alone > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the > dwandhas - > > Pairs of > > > opposites like: > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > > 3. Future - Past > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the > > space. It > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given > name. > > It is > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and > Anantam. > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > > Infact, it is > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is > Satya in the > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can > > shock us > > > into our senses. > > > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we > > need the > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with > the > > viveka > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > > Atmabala, Moon > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in > > this, if > > > only we were to will it. > > > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also > > releases > > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > > particular trait > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. > The whole > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > > MahaMaya. It > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature > amounts to > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the > > one who > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, > the > > destiny > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed > > because > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of > Moon as my > > > > arguing point) > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South > > magnatic > > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal > yog ? > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be > starting > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu > Astrology" > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the > nature > > > > that is > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of > life and > > > > can it > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by > many > > > > because it > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive > personality, > > > > dharma, > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the > society, > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when > one > > > > needs it. Now > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > > However, when it > > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > > > society. > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > > things. So for > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it > has a > > > > role in > > > > > Spirituality: > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of > seeking > > > > honor and > > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can > bring > > > > a balance > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters > say: "Take > > > > the Middle > > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor > fellow > > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. > House > > > > is > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does > have some > > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite > of > > > > what it > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its > implications > > > > to > > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of > Jupiter > > > > and > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in > terms per > > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > > > > mentality > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that > there > > > > is > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either > theories. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- > now > > > > that > > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen > individually. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi > <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > > destroyer of > > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein > Chhed > > > > Karta > > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 dear tatvam ji yes, let us agree to this conclusion that you have your own thoughts and i have my own thoughts and we respect each others thoughts and stop debating on your and my thoughts. of course we can keep discussing about the subject and concepts without proving your thinking is right or my thinking is right. with best wishes pandit arjun vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego wrote: > > Dear Arjun ji, > > You stick to your thinking and I will stick to mine. > > Ttavam-Asi > > About Shaankaracharya of Kanchi, his chart has been discussed and I have already posted my reading on him. > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > dear friends > > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam > ji too knows that they are far from truth. > > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. > > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all > planets. however, let me put my own understanding: > > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. > > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status > and they are not planets. > > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are > not reckoned) > > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either > for rasi or bhava. > > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they > can project even the worst negative results in a positive language. > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land. > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful > presentation of negative things. > > truly rahu is known for deceit. > > with best wishes > pandit arjun > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > wrote: > > > > Prafulla ji, > > > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail, > please let me know. I will send it to you. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > Sir > > > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > > > regards / Prafulla > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > wrote: > > > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > > Good to read your views. > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one > for me) > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number > 142. > > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will > > reply back. > > > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > > limitation is > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, > Rahu > > alone > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the > dwandhas - > > Pairs of > > > opposites like: > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > > 3. Future - Past > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the > > space. It > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given > name. > > It is > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and > Anantam. > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > > Infact, it is > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is > Satya in the > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can > > shock us > > > into our senses. > > > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we > > need the > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with > the > > viveka > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > > Atmabala, Moon > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in > > this, if > > > only we were to will it. > > > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also > > releases > > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > > particular trait > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. > The whole > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > > MahaMaya. It > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature > amounts to > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the > > one who > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, > the > > destiny > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed > > because > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of > Moon as my > > > > arguing point) > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South > > magnatic > > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru- Kaal > yog ? > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be > starting > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu > Astrology" > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the > nature > > > > that is > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of > life and > > > > can it > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by > many > > > > because it > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive > personality, > > > > dharma, > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the > society, > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when > one > > > > needs it. Now > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > > However, when it > > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > > > society. > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > > things. So for > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it > has a > > > > role in > > > > > Spirituality: > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of > seeking > > > > honor and > > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can > bring > > > > a balance > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters > say: "Take > > > > the Middle > > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor > fellow > > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. > House > > > > is > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does > have some > > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite > of > > > > what it > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its > implications > > > > to > > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of > Jupiter > > > > and > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in > terms per > > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist (Jup) > > > > mentality > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that > there > > > > is > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either > theories. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- > now > > > > that > > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen > individually. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi > <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > > destroyer of > > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein > Chhed > > > > Karta > > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 My congratulations to both of you wonderful human beings: Arjun Panditji and Tatvamasi ji! You have demonstrated how easy it is to walk away from disagreement! Bravo!! RR vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004" <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear tatvam ji > > yes, let us agree to this conclusion that you have your own thoughts > and i have my own thoughts and we respect each others thoughts and > stop debating on your and my thoughts. of course we can keep > discussing about the subject and concepts without proving your > thinking is right or my thinking is right. > > with best wishes > pandit arjun > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Arjun ji, > > > > You stick to your thinking and I will stick to mine. > > > > Ttavam-Asi > > > > About Shaankaracharya of Kanchi, his chart has been discussed > and I have already posted my reading on him. > > > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > dear friends > > > > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling > him > > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more > examples > > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child > > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam > > ji too knows that they are far from truth. > > > > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer > > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that > this > > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the > arrest > > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of > > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature > > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. > > > > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all > > planets. however, let me put my own understanding: > > > > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. > > > > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary > status > > and they are not planets. > > > > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and > > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in > > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are > > not reckoned) > > > > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any > exaltation > > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either > > for rasi or bhava. > > > > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give > > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that > they > > can project even the worst negative results in a positive > language. > > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to > a > > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits > and > > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of > > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread > > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in > > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting > that > > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these > > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign > land. > > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful > > presentation of negative things. > > > > truly rahu is known for deceit. > > > > with best wishes > > pandit arjun > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Prafulla ji, > > > > > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you > fail, > > please let me know. I will send it to you. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > Sir > > > > > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > > > > > regards / Prafulla > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > > > Good to read your views. > > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are > one > > for me) > > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal > number > > 142. > > > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I > will > > > reply back. > > > > > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > > > limitation is > > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. > Therefore, > > Rahu > > > alone > > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the > > dwandhas - > > > Pairs of > > > > opposites like: > > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > > > 3. Future - Past > > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of > the > > > space. It > > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given > > name. > > > It is > > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and > > Anantam. > > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > > > Infact, it is > > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is > > Satya in the > > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu > can > > > shock us > > > > into our senses. > > > > > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So > we > > > need the > > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide > with > > the > > > viveka > > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > > > Atmabala, Moon > > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all > in > > > this, if > > > > only we were to will it. > > > > > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, > also > > > releases > > > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > > > particular trait > > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. > > The whole > > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > > > MahaMaya. It > > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature > > amounts to > > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To > the > > > one who > > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, > > the > > > destiny > > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be > destroyed > > > because > > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of > > Moon as my > > > > > arguing point) > > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North > South > > > magnatic > > > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru- > Kaal > > yog ? > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would > be > > starting > > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu > > Astrology" > > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the > > nature > > > > > that is > > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of > > life and > > > > > can it > > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good > by > > many > > > > > because it > > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive > > personality, > > > > > dharma, > > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the > > society, > > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when > > one > > > > > needs it. Now > > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > > > However, when it > > > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in > the > > > > > society. > > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > > > things. So for > > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, > it > > has a > > > > > role in > > > > > > Spirituality: > > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of > > seeking > > > > > honor and > > > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it > can > > bring > > > > > a balance > > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters > > say: "Take > > > > > the Middle > > > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this > poor > > fellow > > > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the > 7th. > > House > > > > > is > > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does > > have some > > > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but > inspite > > of > > > > > what it > > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its > > implications > > > > > to > > > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of > > Jupiter > > > > > and > > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in > > terms per > > > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist > (Jup) > > > > > mentality > > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact > that > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either > > theories. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist > council- > > now > > > > > that > > > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen > > individually. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a > completely > > > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi > > <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > > > destroyer of > > > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein > > Chhed > > > > > Karta > > > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 dear prafulla ji all your observations are correct. one has a choice to become vidya sampanna or vastu sampanna. as bhartruhari writes "ksheeyante khilabhushanani satatam vaak bhushanam bhushanam" one has a choice of vaak bhushanam or suvarna bhushanam, it is up to you how you measure the wealth. with best wishes pandit arjun vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" <ripra_solutions wrote: > > Dear Pandit Arjun ji > > Let me clarify you, I am not for / against Jupiter. But did you find > it giving "big" materialistic results? I have not yet. > > In lighter note ( no offence), traditionally - astrology is taught, > read and practised by Brahmin (satvik people) ruled by guru. If it is > dhankarka, how many of them have become millionaire, in current times. > > Guru is often considered as dhan karka. In old days, wealth was > knowledge / "gyan". Kings used to respect and gift tangible/ > intangible assets to learned pandits etc. and anyone, who was learned > used to have such blessings from society and kingdoms. So guru was > rightly called dhan karka and guru dasha was hailed as the best > possible dasha on the planet. Now the dynamics have changed in current > yuga, and guru (no doubt it is somya and satvik ) often fails to > deliver materialistic success. In modern technology age (even from > industrial age), knowledge has no role for wealth. and materialistic > results can be seen only from the other significators. Guru can be one > of the factor for an individual success, but can never be candidate > for final say. > > Coming to guru chandala yoga (guru / rahu together) will render > excellent materialistic results, for gyan now guided by rahu (moden > yuga's ground rules - ambitions, big plans, growth, manipulation, > competitive fierceness). > > Coming to another interesting observation - whenever transit rahu is > over guru and if at the same time transit guru over rahu - the native > faces very difficult times in terms of the materialistic pursuits. > > While reading so many charts, I observed (members may share their > experience) - > > -venus, saturn, rahu renders much more wealth than guru > -8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th house > -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days > -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for > materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be critical > for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house" > > there can be long list, which we may arrive at..and planets need to be > seen from current yuga's perspective. I repeat, no one factor will > ever result an event, but when we want to mark the main candidate for > a result, watch out - jupiter is not geared for materialistic and > competitive pursuits. > > regards / Prafulla > > vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him > > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples > > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child > > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam > > ji too knows that they are far from truth. > > > > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer > > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this > > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest > > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of > > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature > > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. > > > > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all > > planets. however, let me put my own understanding: > > > > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. > > > > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status > > and they are not planets. > > > > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and > > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in > > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are > > not reckoned) > > > > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation > > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either > > for rasi or bhava. > > > > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give > > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they > > can project even the worst negative results in a positive language. > > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a > > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and > > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of > > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread > > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in > > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that > > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these > > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land. > > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful > > presentation of negative things. > > > > truly rahu is known for deceit. > > > > with best wishes > > pandit arjun > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Prafulla ji, > > > > > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail, > > please let me know. I will send it to you. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > Sir > > > > > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > > > > > regards / Prafulla > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > > > Good to read your views. > > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one > > for me) > > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number > > 142. > > > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will > > > reply back. > > > > > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > > > limitation is > > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, > > Rahu > > > alone > > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the > > dwandhas - > > > Pairs of > > > > opposites like: > > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > > > 3. Future - Past > > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the > > > space. It > > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given > > name. > > > It is > > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and > > Anantam. > > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > > > Infact, it is > > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is > > Satya in the > > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can > > > shock us > > > > into our senses. > > > > > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we > > > need the > > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with > > the > > > viveka > > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > > > Atmabala, Moon > > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in > > > this, if > > > > only we were to will it. > > > > > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also > > > releases > > > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > > > particular trait > > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non- acceptance. > > The whole > > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > > > MahaMaya. It > > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature > > amounts to > > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the > > > one who > > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, > > the > > > destiny > > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed > > > because > > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of > > Moon as my > > > > > arguing point) > > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South > > > magnatic > > > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru- Kaal > > yog ? > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be > > starting > > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu > > Astrology" > > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the > > nature > > > > > that is > > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of > > life and > > > > > can it > > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by > > many > > > > > because it > > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive > > personality, > > > > > dharma, > > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the > > society, > > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when > > one > > > > > needs it. Now > > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > > > However, when it > > > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > > > > society. > > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > > > things. So for > > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it > > has a > > > > > role in > > > > > > Spirituality: > > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of > > seeking > > > > > honor and > > > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can > > bring > > > > > a balance > > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters > > say: "Take > > > > > the Middle > > > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor > > fellow > > > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. > > House > > > > > is > > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does > > have some > > > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite > > of > > > > > what it > > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its > > implications > > > > > to > > > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of > > Jupiter > > > > > and > > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in > > terms per > > > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist (Jup) > > > > > mentality > > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either > > theories. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- > > now > > > > > that > > > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen > > individually. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi > > <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > > > destroyer of > > > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein > > Chhed > > > > > Karta > > > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Souvik Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in relative context. Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but is it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping factor (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise, when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from technology, industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented by "dhan karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not represented by jupiter. Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in kendra / trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and their dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully explained by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter, what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success in dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be giving good results. In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective for kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been made dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal favours. Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and find a rational conclusion. regards / Prafulla Gang vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" <explore_vulcan wrote: > > Respected member, > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > called Jupiter. > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > really good things to offer as well. > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to > Rahu. > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say. > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > That is how the world is. > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that > is definitely an issue. > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > different turn. > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > Thanks > > Souvik > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of > the place he occupies. > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta > Hai. > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Prafulla, Many years ago, when I was a teenager, I had a friend Suresh. He was born a vaishya (went on to become a lawyer) but he was one who was raised on scriptures. His father (also a lawyer and a vrishchika lagna) had the most extensive library of hindu scriptures and many other books from all cultures. Suresh, a dhanu with moon in eighth and jupiter in kumbha and sun in mesha who was the main reason that I stayed on in jyotish (Thanks Suresh!) taught me a big lesson when this jupitarian once during our regular discussions stated: People ask for wealth, for health, for beautiful brides and healthy and famous children. If God comes to me, Ranjan, I will just ask for absolute and permanent contentment, eternal santosh!" RR vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" <ripra_solutions wrote: > > Dear Souvik > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > relative context. > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but is > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping factor > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise, > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from technology, > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented by "dhan > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not represented > by jupiter. > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in kendra / > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and their > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully explained > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter, > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success in > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be > giving good results. > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective for > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been made > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > favours. > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and > find a rational conclusion. > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > Respected member, > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > called Jupiter. > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to > > Rahu. > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say. > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that > > is definitely an issue. > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > different turn. > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > Thanks > > > > Souvik > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta > > Hai. > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Prafullaji, I completely agree with you when you talk about "Sthana-Kaala-Patra" considerations. Did u know I am running a thread called "Practical Parasara" on my group navlakshya to study the theories of Parasara with modern charts in today's age and time. And believe me some things don't work. Yes, I agree with you when you say that "wealth" like many other things in life is relative and its definition has changed over times. But Prafulla ji, everything said and done, to ascribe Jupiter to a completely material domain and assign Rahu as a full spiritual planet does not stand the test of time. Wouldn't this debate be more fruitful if we came up with examples of real life instead of just theories? BTW, please do join in my discussion on "Practical Parasara" on navlakshya/ I would be glad to see u there... Thanks Souvik vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" <ripra_solutions wrote: > > Dear Souvik > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > relative context. > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but is > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping factor > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise, > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from technology, > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented by "dhan > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not represented > by jupiter. > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in kendra / > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and their > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully explained > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter, > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success in > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be > giving good results. > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective for > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been made > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > favours. > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and > find a rational conclusion. > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > Respected member, > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > called Jupiter. > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to > > Rahu. > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say. > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that > > is definitely an issue. > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > different turn. > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > Thanks > > > > Souvik > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta > > Hai. > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 BTW, I have not d to rahu / ketu for materialistic planets. There are possibilities of them working positively for either of pursuits. But yes, in my opinion, guru may be contributing by its characteristics to the "wealth", but can not be singled out as main candidate (even while being hailed as dhana karka) for wealth. regards / Prafulla vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" <explore_vulcan wrote: > > Dear Prafullaji, > > I completely agree with you when you talk about "Sthana-Kaala-Patra" > considerations. > > Did u know I am running a thread called "Practical Parasara" on my > group navlakshya to study the theories of Parasara with modern > charts in today's age and time. And believe me some things don't > work. > > Yes, I agree with you when you say that "wealth" like many other > things in life is relative and its definition has changed over times. > > But Prafulla ji, everything said and done, to ascribe Jupiter to a > completely material domain and assign Rahu as a full spiritual > planet does not stand the test of time. > > Wouldn't this debate be more fruitful if we came up with examples of > real life instead of just theories? > > BTW, please do join in my discussion on "Practical Parasara" on > navlakshya/ > > I would be glad to see u there... > > Thanks > > Souvik > > vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" > <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > > Dear Souvik > > > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > > relative context. > > > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, > but is > > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping > factor > > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it > be > > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and > likewise, > > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from > technology, > > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented > by "dhan > > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars > (one > > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not > represented > > by jupiter. > > > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in > kendra / > > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and > their > > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully > explained > > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no > matter, > > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success > in > > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be > > giving good results. > > > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective > for > > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been > made > > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for > the > > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > > favours. > > > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age > and > > find a rational conclusion. > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > is > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of > what it > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > to > > > Rahu. > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > and > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > say. > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > mentality > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > is > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > that > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > different turn. > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > destroyer of > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > Karta > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Namaskaar Sri Tatvam-Asiji If I search for message number 142 on Vedic Astrology list, it only shows message number 7721. I think has deleted earlier messages. It would be nice if you can send me your message. Thanks and Regards Bharat On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego > wrote: > > Sri Bharat ji, > Good to read your views. > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one for me) > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number 142. > Then you will understand my thoughts. > Tatvam-Asi > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology > wrote: > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will reply > back. > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that limitation is > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, Rahu alone > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the dwandhas - Pairs > of > opposites like: > 1. Likes -Dislikes > 2. Honour -Dishonour > 3. Future - Past > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > and so on and on and on..... > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the space. > It > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given name. It is > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and Anantam. > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. Infact, it > is > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is Satya in the > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can shock us > into our senses. > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we need the > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with the viveka > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as Atmabala, > Moon > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in this, if > only we were to will it. > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also releases > us due to the same Lord. > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a particular > trait > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. The whole > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but MahaMaya. > It > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature amounts to > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the one who > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, the destiny > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > Thanks and Regards > Bharat On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego > wrote: > > > > Dear friend, > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed because > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of Moon as my > > arguing point) > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South magnatic > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal yog ? > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be starting > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan > wrote: > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > Regards, > > > > Souvik > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology" > > <hinduastrology wrote: > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature > > that is > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and > > can it > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many > > because it > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality, > > dharma, > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society, > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one > > needs it. Now > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > However, when it > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > society. > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > things. So for > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a > > role in > > > Spirituality: > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking > > honor and > > > respect in society. > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring > > a balance > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take > > the Middle > > > Path". > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > > is > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of > > what it > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > > to > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > > and > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > > say. > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > > mentality > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > > is > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > > that > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > destroyer of > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > > Karta > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Ranjan ji Yes, I never disagree of the role of benefic Guru (and enjoy too with exalted guru in my chart as well). In fact, my contention was never against role of planet Guru (as the thread might appear). I was just quesioning (probably dragged it little further than required), if it works as dhana karka in the current age. Jupiter is certainly a somya planet and if benefic for a chart, will bless with good things (e.g. its karkatavs - good children, eternal peace, content life, religious pursuits, good karmic pursuits in this life and satvik approach etc). And also do agree that not necessarily "wealth" (as may be provided by other planets) can provide such nice contentment. regards / Prafulla vedic astrology, "crystal pages" <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Dear Prafulla, > > Many years ago, when I was a teenager, I had a friend Suresh. He was > born a vaishya (went on to become a lawyer) but he was one who was > raised on scriptures. His father (also a lawyer and a vrishchika > lagna) had the most extensive library of hindu scriptures and many > other books from all cultures. > > Suresh, a dhanu with moon in eighth and jupiter in kumbha and sun in > mesha who was the main reason that I stayed on in jyotish (Thanks > Suresh!) taught me a big lesson when this jupitarian once during our > regular discussions stated: People ask for wealth, for health, for > beautiful brides and healthy and famous children. If God comes to me, > Ranjan, I will just ask for absolute and permanent contentment, > eternal santosh!" > > RR > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" > <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > > Dear Souvik > > > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > > relative context. > > > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but > is > > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping > factor > > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be > > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise, > > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from > technology, > > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented > by "dhan > > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one > > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not > represented > > by jupiter. > > > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in > kendra / > > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and > their > > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully > explained > > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter, > > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success > in > > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be > > giving good results. > > > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective > for > > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been > made > > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the > > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > > favours. > > > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and > > find a rational conclusion. > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > is > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what > it > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > to > > > Rahu. > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > and > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > say. > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > mentality > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > is > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > that > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > different turn. > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer > of > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > Karta > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear Prafulla, I think you have a point in the following: "-8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th house > -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days > -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for > materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be critical > for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house" I wish you would share your research knowledge with others in the forum. Thank you, Blessings Renu > vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" <ripra_solutions wrote: > > Dear Pandit Arjun ji > > Let me clarify you, I am not for / against Jupiter. But did you find > it giving "big" materialistic results? I have not yet. > > In lighter note ( no offence), traditionally - astrology is taught, > read and practised by Brahmin (satvik people) ruled by guru. If it is > dhankarka, how many of them have become millionaire, in current times. > > Guru is often considered as dhan karka. In old days, wealth was > knowledge / "gyan". Kings used to respect and gift tangible/ > intangible assets to learned pandits etc. and anyone, who was learned > used to have such blessings from society and kingdoms. So guru was > rightly called dhan karka and guru dasha was hailed as the best > possible dasha on the planet. Now the dynamics have changed in current > yuga, and guru (no doubt it is somya and satvik ) often fails to > deliver materialistic success. In modern technology age (even from > industrial age), knowledge has no role for wealth. and materialistic > results can be seen only from the other significators. Guru can be one > of the factor for an individual success, but can never be candidate > for final say. > > Coming to guru chandala yoga (guru / rahu together) will render > excellent materialistic results, for gyan now guided by rahu (moden > yuga's ground rules - ambitions, big plans, growth, manipulation, > competitive fierceness). > > Coming to another interesting observation - whenever transit rahu is > over guru and if at the same time transit guru over rahu - the native > faces very difficult times in terms of the materialistic pursuits. > > While reading so many charts, I observed (members may share their > experience) - > > -venus, saturn, rahu renders much more wealth than guru > -8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th house > -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days > -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for > materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be critical > for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house" > > there can be long list, which we may arrive at..and planets need to be > seen from current yuga's perspective. I repeat, no one factor will > ever result an event, but when we want to mark the main candidate for > a result, watch out - jupiter is not geared for materialistic and > competitive pursuits. > > regards / Prafulla > > vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him > > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples > > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child > > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam > > ji too knows that they are far from truth. > > > > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer > > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this > > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest > > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of > > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature > > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected. > > > > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all > > planets. however, let me put my own understanding: > > > > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets. > > > > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status > > and they are not planets. > > > > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and > > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in > > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are > > not reckoned) > > > > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation > > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either > > for rasi or bhava. > > > > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give > > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they > > can project even the worst negative results in a positive language. > > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a > > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and > > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of > > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread > > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in > > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that > > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these > > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land. > > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful > > presentation of negative things. > > > > truly rahu is known for deceit. > > > > with best wishes > > pandit arjun > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Prafulla ji, > > > > > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail, > > please let me know. I will send it to you. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > Sir > > > > > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu. > > > > > > regards / Prafulla > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sri Bharat ji, > > > > Good to read your views. > > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one > > for me) > > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number > > 142. > > > > Then you will understand my thoughts. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji > > > > > > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will > > > reply back. > > > > > > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that > > > limitation is > > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, > > Rahu > > > alone > > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the > > dwandhas - > > > Pairs of > > > > opposites like: > > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes > > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour > > > > 3. Future - Past > > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow > > > > and so on and on and on..... > > > > > > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the > > > space. It > > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given > > name. > > > It is > > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and > > Anantam. > > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. > > > Infact, it is > > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is > > Satya in the > > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can > > > shock us > > > > into our senses. > > > > > > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we > > > need the > > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with > > the > > > viveka > > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as > > > Atmabala, Moon > > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in > > > this, if > > > > only we were to will it. > > > > > > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also > > > releases > > > > us due to the same Lord. > > > > > > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a > > > particular trait > > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. > > The whole > > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but > > > MahaMaya. It > > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature > > amounts to > > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the > > > one who > > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, > > the > > > destiny > > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body. > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji, > > > > > > > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed > > > because > > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of > > Moon as my > > > > > arguing point) > > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South > > > magnatic > > > > > force which always exists in universe. > > > > > > > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA. > > > > > > > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru- Kaal > > yog ? > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be > > starting > > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008. > > > > > > > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > Namaskar Bharatji, > > > > > > > > > > I have always admired your posts... > > > > > > > > > > As always I could not agree any more > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu > > Astrology" > > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the > > nature > > > > > that is > > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of > > life and > > > > > can it > > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by > > many > > > > > because it > > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive > > personality, > > > > > dharma, > > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the > > society, > > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when > > one > > > > > needs it. Now > > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population. > > > > > However, when it > > > > > > comes to Spirituality: > > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru. > > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru. > > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the > > > > > society. > > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad > > > > > things. So for > > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it > > has a > > > > > role in > > > > > > Spirituality: > > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things > > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points. > > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution. > > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of > > seeking > > > > > honor and > > > > > > respect in society. > > > > > > > > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can > > bring > > > > > a balance > > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters > > say: "Take > > > > > the Middle > > > > > > Path". > > > > > > > > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor > > fellow > > > > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. > > House > > > > > is > > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does > > have some > > > > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite > > of > > > > > what it > > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its > > implications > > > > > to > > > > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of > > Jupiter > > > > > and > > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in > > terms per > > > > > say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist (Jup) > > > > > mentality > > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either > > theories. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- > > now > > > > > that > > > > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen > > individually. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi > > <nameisego@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > > > > > destroyer of > > > > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein > > Chhed > > > > > Karta > > > > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Dear learned members, I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good' or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn and so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who are responsible for our own karma. Blessings, Renuji vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" <ripra_solutions wrote: > > Dear Souvik > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > relative context. > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but is > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping factor > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise, > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from technology, > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented by "dhan > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not represented > by jupiter. > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in kendra / > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and their > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully explained > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter, > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success in > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be > giving good results. > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective for > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been made > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > favours. > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and > find a rational conclusion. > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > Respected member, > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > called Jupiter. > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to > > Rahu. > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say. > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that > > is definitely an issue. > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > different turn. > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > Thanks > > > > Souvik > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta > > Hai. > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Dear Renuji, Parashara did and all the ancient jyotishis and rishis, and even later day saints, in the 16th century and even modern jyotish teachers right down to the 1980s and 90s! I know some of the modern western/tropical astrologer/psychologists have tried very hard to move away from what they call the black and white and doom and gloom labelling and perhaps you have been influenced by their writings. Really, it just sounds more ominous in the way the texts are translated. There are plenty of jyotish writings that get you so close to the 'black' that your *eye* begins to see the "grey" even in those blacks! How many jyotish explorers really get so close to or are willing to get so close to the black to see the grey that is there? But as far as Sages are concerned -- Sorry, but you are on your own on this one! I am not going against all those formidable Sages! Rohiniranjan vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw wrote: > > Dear learned members, > > I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good' > or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined > paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our > past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn and > so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself > but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is > what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us > good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who > are responsible for our own karma. > > Blessings, > > Renuji > > > > vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" > <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > > Dear Souvik > > > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > > relative context. > > > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but > is > > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping > factor > > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be > > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise, > > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from > technology, > > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented > by "dhan > > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one > > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not > represented > > by jupiter. > > > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in > kendra / > > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and > their > > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully > explained > > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter, > > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success > in > > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be > > giving good results. > > > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective > for > > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been > made > > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the > > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > > favours. > > > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and > > find a rational conclusion. > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > is > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what > it > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > to > > > Rahu. > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter > and > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > say. > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > mentality > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there > is > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories. > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > that > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > different turn. > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer > of > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > Karta > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Dear Members, I do not have the knowledge in astrology to contribute or critically examine the propositions of learned members. This topic of Guru-Chandal lead me to a story about Jagadguru Adi Shankaracharya. I reproduce the pertinent parts below for those interested( Most of you might know this already....) . Sorry for this non astrological post. The following is taken from the site with address ; http://www.exoticindiaart.com/article/shankaracharya Start Confrontation with an Untouchable One scorching day of summer, the worthy saint and his followers were going to bathe in the river Ganges at the Manikarna ghat. On their way, the party encountered a chandal (keeper of cremation grounds) who is considered the lowest amongst lowest in the hierarchy of Indian castes. Accompanying the outcaste were his four repulsive dogs. Addressing the untouchable, Shankaracharya asked him to move away and make way for them. The hunter then raised some interesting questions: "You are always going about preaching that the Vedas teach the non dual Brahman to be the only reality which is immutable and unpollutable. If this is so how has this sense of difference overtaken you? There are hundreds of yogis going around indulging in high sounding philosophical talk, donning the ochre robe and exhibiting other insignia of holy life like the water pot and staff. But not even a ray of knowledge having found entrance into their hearts, their holy exterior serves only to dupe householders. You have asked me to move aside and make way for you. To whom were your words addressed O learned Sir? To the body which comes from the same source and performs the same functions in the case of both a brahmin (the highest caste) and an outcaste? Or to the atman (soul), which too is the same in all, unaffected by anything material like the body? How do such differences as 'this is a brahmin, or this is an outcaste,' arise in the essentially non-dual world, which is the philosophy you preach. O revered teacher, is the sun changed in the least, if it reflects in the liquor pot or in the holy Ganga? How can you indulge in such false sentiments as 'Being a brahmin I am pure; and you, dog-eater, must therefore give way for me,' when the truth is that the one universal and unblemishable bodiless spirit is shining alike in each of our physical forms. Forgetting, due to false attachment, one's own true nature as the material-less spirit - beyond thoughts and words, unmanifest, beginningless, endless and pure - how indeed have you come to identify yourself with the body which is but unsteady like the ears of an elephant." It is believed that the chandala was none other than Lord Shiva in disguise, and the four canines the four Vedas. The sage immediately fell to the feet of the outcaste and composed there a quintad of scintillating verses, called the 'Manishapanchakam,' summing up the absolute truth as follows: >*From the standpoint of the body, O Shiva, I am thy servant; *from the standpoint of the soul, O Thou with three eyes, I become a part of Thine; and O the Self of all, from the standpoint of the Self, I am verily Thou: This is my settled conclusion reached with the help of all shastras. End. On 5/22/06, renunw <renunw (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: > > Dear learned members, > > I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good' > or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined > paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our > past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn and > so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself > but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is > what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us > good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who > are responsible for our own karma. > > Blessings, > > Renuji > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Dear Rohiniji, I am sorry if you misunderstood. I do not have any question regarding the teachings of ancient rishis. I do love astrlogy too. I am a Buddhist thus I believe that 'good' and 'bad' we have to face in this life are results of our past 'karmas'. Blessings to you my friend, Renuji vedic astrology, "Rohini (Crystal Pages)" <clarity2020 wrote: > > Dear Renuji, > > Parashara did and all the ancient jyotishis and rishis, and even > later day saints, in the 16th century and even modern jyotish > teachers right down to the 1980s and 90s! > > I know some of the modern western/tropical astrologer/psychologists > have tried very hard to move away from what they call the black and > white and doom and gloom labelling and perhaps you have been > influenced by their writings. > > Really, it just sounds more ominous in the way the texts are > translated. There are plenty of jyotish writings that get you so > close to the 'black' that your *eye* begins to see the "grey" even in > those blacks! > > How many jyotish explorers really get so close to or are willing to > get so close to the black to see the grey that is there? > > But as far as Sages are concerned -- Sorry, but you are on your own > on this one! I am not going against all those formidable Sages! > > Rohiniranjan > > > > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote: > > > > Dear learned members, > > > > I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good' > > or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined > > paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our > > past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn > and > > so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself > > but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is > > what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us > > good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who > > are responsible for our own karma. > > > > Blessings, > > > > Renuji > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang" > > <ripra_solutions@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Souvik > > > > > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if > > > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their > > > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in > > > relative context. > > > > > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, > but > > is > > > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find > > > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping > > factor > > > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it > be > > > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and > likewise, > > > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore > > > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from > > technology, > > > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented > > by "dhan > > > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars > (one > > > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not > > represented > > > by jupiter. > > > > > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright > > > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if > > > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in > > kendra / > > > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha. > > > > > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and > > their > > > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully > > explained > > > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no > matter, > > > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas. > > > > > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly > success > > in > > > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to > be > > > giving good results. > > > > > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective > > for > > > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been > > made > > > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was > > > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for > the > > > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal > > > favours. > > > > > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just > > > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age > and > > > find a rational conclusion. > > > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta" > > > <explore_vulcan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected member, > > > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor > fellow > > > > called Jupiter. > > > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House > > is > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have > some > > > > really good things to offer as well. > > > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of > what > > it > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications > > to > > > > Rahu. > > > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of > Jupiter > > and > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per > > say. > > > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) > > mentality > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that > there > > is > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either > theories. > > > > > > > > That is how the world is. > > > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now > > that > > > > is definitely an issue. > > > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually. > > > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely > > > > different turn. > > > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Souvik > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ? > > > > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth. > > > > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and > destroyer > > of > > > > the place he occupies. > > > > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed > > Karta > > > > Hai. > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog. > > > > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.