Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Guru Chandaal Yog .........-WHY SO?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Respected member,

 

Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

called Jupiter.

 

Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is

ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

really good things to offer as well.

 

Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it

is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to

Rahu.

 

In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and

thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say.

 

Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality

and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is

no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

 

That is how the world is.

 

However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that

is definitely an issue.

 

Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

 

However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

different turn.

 

BTW, I have this yoga.

 

Thanks

 

Souvik

 

vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego

wrote:

>

>

>

> Friends,

>

> Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

>

> Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

>

> Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of

the place he occupies.

>

> As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta

Hai.

>

> I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaskar Bharatji,

 

I have always admired your posts...

 

As always I could not agree any more :)

 

Regards,

 

Souvik

 

vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology"

<hinduastrology wrote:

>

> Namaskaar Sri Souvik

>

> Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature

that is

> provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and

can it

> good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many

because it

> bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality,

dharma,

> initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society,

> strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one

needs it. Now

> all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

However, when it

> comes to Spirituality:

> 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the

society.

> 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

>

> Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

things. So for

> 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a

role in

> Spirituality:

> 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking

honor and

> respect in society.

>

> When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring

a balance

> of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take

the Middle

> Path".

>

> You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

>

> Thanks and Regards

> Bharat

>

>

>

> On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan wrote:

> >

> > Respected member,

> >

> > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > called Jupiter.

> >

> > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

is

> > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > really good things to offer as well.

> >

> > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

what it

> > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

to

> > Rahu.

> >

> > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

and

> > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

say.

> >

> > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

mentality

> > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

is

> > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> >

> > That is how the world is.

> >

> > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

that

> > is definitely an issue.

> >

> > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> >

> > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > different turn.

> >

> > BTW, I have this yoga.

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> >

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Friends,

> > >

> > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > >

> > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > >

> > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

destroyer of

> > the place he occupies.

> > >

> > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

Karta

> > Hai.

> > >

> > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

 

It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will reply back..

 

Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that limitation is

"Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, Rahu alone

cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the dwandhas - Pairs of

opposites like:

1. Likes -Dislikes

2. Honour -Dishonour

3. Future - Past

4. Hapiness - Sorrow

and so on and on and on.....

 

Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the space. It

is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given name. It is

dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and Anantam.

Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. Infact, it is

the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is Satya in the

form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can shock us

into our senses.

 

Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we need the

energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with the viveka

and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as Atmabala, Moon

for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in this, if

only we were to will it.

 

The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also releases

us due to the same Lord.

 

Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a particular trait

of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. The whole

nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but MahaMaya. It

is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature amounts to

non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the one who

accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, the destiny

and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

 

Thanks and Regards

Bharat

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego > wrote:

>

> Dear friend,

>

> Good post from you and Bharat ji,

>

> However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed because

> Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of Moon as my

> arguing point)

> Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South magnatic

> force which always exists in universe.

>

> That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

>

> Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal yog ?

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

> By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be starting

> Rahu dasa in 2008.

>

> Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan > wrote:

> Namaskar Bharatji,

>

> I have always admired your posts...

>

> As always I could not agree any more :)

>

> Regards,

>

> Souvik

>

> vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology"

> <hinduastrology wrote:

> >

> > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> >

> > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature

> that is

> > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and

> can it

> > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many

> because it

> > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality,

> dharma,

> > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society,

> > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one

> needs it. Now

> > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> However, when it

> > comes to Spirituality:

> > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the

> society.

> > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> >

> > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> things. So for

> > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a

> role in

> > Spirituality:

> > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking

> honor and

> > respect in society.

> >

> > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring

> a balance

> > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take

> the Middle

> > Path".

> >

> > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards

> > Bharat

> >

> >

> >

> > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected member,

> > >

> > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > > called Jupiter.

> > >

> > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

> is

> > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > > really good things to offer as well.

> > >

> > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

> what it

> > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

> to

> > > Rahu.

> > >

> > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

> and

> > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

> say.

> > >

> > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> mentality

> > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

> is

> > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> > >

> > > That is how the world is.

> > >

> > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

> that

> > > is definitely an issue.

> > >

> > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> > >

> > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > different turn.

> > >

> > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > >

> > > Souvik

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > >

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Friends,

> > > >

> > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > >

> > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> destroyer of

> > > the place he occupies.

> > > >

> > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

> Karta

> > > Hai.

> > > >

> > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dear friends

 

guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him

making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples

were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam

ji too knows that they are far from truth.

 

when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer

tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this

might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest

of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

 

guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

 

1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

 

2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status

and they are not planets.

 

3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are

not reckoned)

 

4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation

or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either

for rasi or bhava.

 

5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they

can project even the worst negative results in a positive language.

for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a

distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and

various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread

and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in

his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that

if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land.

anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful

presentation of negative things.

 

truly rahu is known for deceit.

 

with best wishes

pandit arjun

 

 

vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego

wrote:

>

> Prafulla ji,

>

> I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail,

please let me know. I will send it to you.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

> Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions wrote:

> Sir

>

> How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

wrote:

> >

> > Sri Bharat ji,

> > Good to read your views.

> > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one

for me)

> > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number

142.

> > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> >

> > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will

> reply back.

> >

> > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> limitation is

> > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore,

Rahu

> alone

> > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

dwandhas -

> Pairs of

> > opposites like:

> > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > 3. Future - Past

> > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > and so on and on and on.....

> >

> > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the

> space. It

> > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

name.

> It is

> > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

Anantam.

> > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> Infact, it is

> > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

Satya in the

> > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can

> shock us

> > into our senses.

> >

> > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we

> need the

> > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with

the

> viveka

> > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> Atmabala, Moon

> > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in

> this, if

> > only we were to will it.

> >

> > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also

> releases

> > us due to the same Lord.

> >

> > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> particular trait

> > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

The whole

> > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but

> MahaMaya. It

> > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

amounts to

> > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the

> one who

> > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him,

the

> destiny

> > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards

> > Bharat

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear friend,

> > >

> > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > >

> > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed

> because

> > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

Moon as my

> > > arguing point)

> > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South

> magnatic

> > > force which always exists in universe.

> > >

> > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > >

> > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal

yog ?

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be

starting

> > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > >

> > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > >

> > > I have always admired your posts...

> > >

> > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Souvik

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

Astrology"

> > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > >

> > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the

nature

> > > that is

> > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

life and

> > > can it

> > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by

many

> > > because it

> > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

personality,

> > > dharma,

> > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

society,

> > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when

one

> > > needs it. Now

> > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> > > However, when it

> > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the

> > > society.

> > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > >

> > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> > > things. So for

> > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it

has a

> > > role in

> > > > Spirituality:

> > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

seeking

> > > honor and

> > > > respect in society.

> > > >

> > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can

bring

> > > a balance

> > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

say: "Take

> > > the Middle

> > > > Path".

> > > >

> > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected member,

> > > > >

> > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor

fellow

> > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > >

> > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th.

House

> > > is

> > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

have some

> > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite

of

> > > what it

> > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

implications

> > > to

> > > > > Rahu.

> > > > >

> > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

Jupiter

> > > and

> > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

terms per

> > > say.

> > > > >

> > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> > > mentality

> > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that

there

> > > is

> > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

theories.

> > > > >

> > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > >

> > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council-

now

> > > that

> > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > >

> > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

individually.

> > > > >

> > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > > > different turn.

> > > > >

> > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

<nameisego@>

> > > > >

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > destroyer of

> > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

Chhed

> > > Karta

> > > > > Hai.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

around

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Arjun ji,

You stick to your thinking and I will stick to mine.

Ttavam-Asi

About Shaankaracharya of Kanchi, his chart has been discussed and I have already posted my reading on him.

panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 > wrote:

dear friends

 

guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him

making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples

were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam

ji too knows that they are far from truth.

 

when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer

tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this

might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest

of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

 

guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

 

1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

 

2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status

and they are not planets.

 

3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are

not reckoned)

 

4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation

or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either

for rasi or bhava.

 

5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they

can project even the worst negative results in a positive language.

for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a

distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and

various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread

and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in

his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that

if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land.

anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful

presentation of negative things.

 

truly rahu is known for deceit.

 

with best wishes

pandit arjun

 

 

vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego

wrote:

>

> Prafulla ji,

>

> I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail,

please let me know. I will send it to you.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

> Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions wrote:

> Sir

>

> How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

wrote:

> >

> > Sri Bharat ji,

> > Good to read your views.

> > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one

for me)

> > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number

142.

> > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> >

> > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will

> reply back.

> >

> > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> limitation is

> > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore,

Rahu

> alone

> > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

dwandhas -

> Pairs of

> > opposites like:

> > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > 3. Future - Past

> > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > and so on and on and on.....

> >

> > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the

> space. It

> > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

name.

> It is

> > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

Anantam.

> > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> Infact, it is

> > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

Satya in the

> > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can

> shock us

> > into our senses.

> >

> > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we

> need the

> > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with

the

> viveka

> > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> Atmabala, Moon

> > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in

> this, if

> > only we were to will it.

> >

> > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also

> releases

> > us due to the same Lord.

> >

> > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> particular trait

> > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

The whole

> > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but

> MahaMaya. It

> > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

amounts to

> > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the

> one who

> > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him,

the

> destiny

> > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards

> > Bharat

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear friend,

> > >

> > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > >

> > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed

> because

> > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

Moon as my

> > > arguing point)

> > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South

> magnatic

> > > force which always exists in universe.

> > >

> > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > >

> > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal

yog ?

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be

starting

> > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > >

> > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > >

> > > I have always admired your posts...

> > >

> > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Souvik

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

Astrology"

> > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > >

> > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the

nature

> > > that is

> > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

life and

> > > can it

> > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by

many

> > > because it

> > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

personality,

> > > dharma,

> > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

society,

> > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when

one

> > > needs it. Now

> > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> > > However, when it

> > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the

> > > society.

> > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > >

> > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> > > things. So for

> > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it

has a

> > > role in

> > > > Spirituality:

> > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

seeking

> > > honor and

> > > > respect in society.

> > > >

> > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can

bring

> > > a balance

> > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

say: "Take

> > > the Middle

> > > > Path".

> > > >

> > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected member,

> > > > >

> > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor

fellow

> > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > >

> > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th.

House

> > > is

> > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

have some

> > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite

of

> > > what it

> > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

implications

> > > to

> > > > > Rahu.

> > > > >

> > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

Jupiter

> > > and

> > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

terms per

> > > say.

> > > > >

> > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> > > mentality

> > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that

there

> > > is

> > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

theories.

> > > > >

> > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > >

> > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council-

now

> > > that

> > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > >

> > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

individually.

> > > > >

> > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > > > different turn.

> > > > >

> > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

<nameisego@>

> > > > >

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > destroyer of

> > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

Chhed

> > > Karta

> > > > > Hai.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

around

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Pandit Arjun ji

 

Let me clarify you, I am not for / against Jupiter. But did you find

it giving "big" materialistic results? I have not yet.

 

In lighter note ( no offence), traditionally - astrology is taught,

read and practised by Brahmin (satvik people) ruled by guru. If it is

dhankarka, how many of them have become millionaire, in current times.

 

Guru is often considered as dhan karka. In old days, wealth was

knowledge / "gyan". Kings used to respect and gift tangible/

intangible assets to learned pandits etc. and anyone, who was learned

used to have such blessings from society and kingdoms. So guru was

rightly called dhan karka and guru dasha was hailed as the best

possible dasha on the planet. Now the dynamics have changed in current

yuga, and guru (no doubt it is somya and satvik ) often fails to

deliver materialistic success. In modern technology age (even from

industrial age), knowledge has no role for wealth. and materialistic

results can be seen only from the other significators. Guru can be one

of the factor for an individual success, but can never be candidate

for final say.

 

Coming to guru chandala yoga (guru / rahu together) will render

excellent materialistic results, for gyan now guided by rahu (moden

yuga's ground rules - ambitions, big plans, growth, manipulation,

competitive fierceness).

 

Coming to another interesting observation - whenever transit rahu is

over guru and if at the same time transit guru over rahu - the native

faces very difficult times in terms of the materialistic pursuits.

 

While reading so many charts, I observed (members may share their

experience) -

 

-venus, saturn, rahu renders much more wealth than guru

-8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th house

-12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days

-9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for

materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be critical

for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house"

 

there can be long list, which we may arrive at..and planets need to be

seen from current yuga's perspective. I repeat, no one factor will

ever result an event, but when we want to mark the main candidate for

a result, watch out - jupiter is not geared for materialistic and

competitive pursuits.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

<panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> dear friends

>

> guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling him

> making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more examples

> were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

> with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam

> ji too knows that they are far from truth.

>

> when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer

> tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that this

> might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the arrest

> of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

> would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

>

> guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

>

> 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

>

> 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary status

> and they are not planets.

>

> 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

> hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are

> not reckoned)

>

> 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any exaltation

> or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either

> for rasi or bhava.

>

> 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that they

> can project even the worst negative results in a positive language.

> for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to a

> distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits and

> various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

> saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread

> and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in

> his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting that

> if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign land.

> anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful

> presentation of negative things.

>

> truly rahu is known for deceit.

>

> with best wishes

> pandit arjun

>

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Prafulla ji,

> >

> > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you fail,

> please let me know. I will send it to you.

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > Sir

> >

> > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> >

> > regards / Prafulla

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > Good to read your views.

> > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one

> for me)

> > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number

> 142.

> > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > >

> > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will

> > reply back.

> > >

> > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > limitation is

> > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore,

> Rahu

> > alone

> > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> dwandhas -

> > Pairs of

> > > opposites like:

> > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > 3. Future - Past

> > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > and so on and on and on.....

> > >

> > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the

> > space. It

> > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

> name.

> > It is

> > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> Anantam.

> > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> > Infact, it is

> > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> Satya in the

> > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can

> > shock us

> > > into our senses.

> > >

> > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we

> > need the

> > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with

> the

> > viveka

> > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > Atmabala, Moon

> > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in

> > this, if

> > > only we were to will it.

> > >

> > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also

> > releases

> > > us due to the same Lord.

> > >

> > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > particular trait

> > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

> The whole

> > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but

> > MahaMaya. It

> > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

> amounts to

> > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the

> > one who

> > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him,

> the

> > destiny

> > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > >

> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear friend,

> > > >

> > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > >

> > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed

> > because

> > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> Moon as my

> > > > arguing point)

> > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South

> > magnatic

> > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > >

> > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > >

> > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal

> yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be

> starting

> > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > >

> > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > >

> > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > >

> > > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Souvik

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> Astrology"

> > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the

> nature

> > > > that is

> > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

> life and

> > > > can it

> > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by

> many

> > > > because it

> > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> personality,

> > > > dharma,

> > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

> society,

> > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when

> one

> > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> > > > However, when it

> > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the

> > > > society.

> > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> > > > things. So for

> > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it

> has a

> > > > role in

> > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> seeking

> > > > honor and

> > > > > respect in society.

> > > > >

> > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can

> bring

> > > > a balance

> > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> say: "Take

> > > > the Middle

> > > > > Path".

> > > > >

> > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > Bharat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor

> fellow

> > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th.

> House

> > > > is

> > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> have some

> > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite

> of

> > > > what it

> > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> implications

> > > > to

> > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

> Jupiter

> > > > and

> > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> terms per

> > > > say.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> > > > mentality

> > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that

> there

> > > > is

> > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

> theories.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council-

> now

> > > > that

> > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> individually.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> <nameisego@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> Chhed

> > > > Karta

> > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

> around

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dear tatvam ji

 

yes, let us agree to this conclusion that you have your own thoughts

and i have my own thoughts and we respect each others thoughts and

stop debating on your and my thoughts. of course we can keep

discussing about the subject and concepts without proving your

thinking is right or my thinking is right.

 

with best wishes

pandit arjun

 

vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego

wrote:

>

> Dear Arjun ji,

>

> You stick to your thinking and I will stick to mine.

>

> Ttavam-Asi

>

> About Shaankaracharya of Kanchi, his chart has been discussed

and I have already posted my reading on him.

>

>

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

> dear friends

>

> guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling

him

> making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more

examples

> were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

> with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but tatvam

> ji too knows that they are far from truth.

>

> when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the killer

> tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that

this

> might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the

arrest

> of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

> would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

>

> guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

>

> 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

>

> 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary

status

> and they are not planets.

>

> 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

> hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books are

> not reckoned)

>

> 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any

exaltation

> or debilitation points, they do not have individual results either

> for rasi or bhava.

>

> 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that

they

> can project even the worst negative results in a positive

language.

> for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes to

a

> distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits

and

> various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

> saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his bread

> and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these in

> his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting

that

> if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign

land.

> anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is colourful

> presentation of negative things.

>

> truly rahu is known for deceit.

>

> with best wishes

> pandit arjun

>

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Prafulla ji,

> >

> > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you

fail,

> please let me know. I will send it to you.

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > Sir

> >

> > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> >

> > regards / Prafulla

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > Good to read your views.

> > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are

one

> for me)

> > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal

number

> 142.

> > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > >

> > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I

will

> > reply back.

> > >

> > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > limitation is

> > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways.

Therefore,

> Rahu

> > alone

> > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> dwandhas -

> > Pairs of

> > > opposites like:

> > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > 3. Future - Past

> > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > and so on and on and on.....

> > >

> > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of

the

> > space. It

> > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

> name.

> > It is

> > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> Anantam.

> > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> > Infact, it is

> > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> Satya in the

> > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu

can

> > shock us

> > > into our senses.

> > >

> > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So

we

> > need the

> > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide

with

> the

> > viveka

> > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > Atmabala, Moon

> > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all

in

> > this, if

> > > only we were to will it.

> > >

> > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us,

also

> > releases

> > > us due to the same Lord.

> > >

> > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > particular trait

> > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

> The whole

> > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but

> > MahaMaya. It

> > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

> amounts to

> > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To

the

> > one who

> > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him,

> the

> > destiny

> > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > >

> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear friend,

> > > >

> > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > >

> > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be

destroyed

> > because

> > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> Moon as my

> > > > arguing point)

> > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North

South

> > magnatic

> > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > >

> > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > >

> > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-

Kaal

> yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would

be

> starting

> > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > >

> > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > >

> > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > >

> > > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Souvik

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> Astrology"

> > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the

> nature

> > > > that is

> > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

> life and

> > > > can it

> > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good

by

> many

> > > > because it

> > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> personality,

> > > > dharma,

> > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

> society,

> > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when

> one

> > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> > > > However, when it

> > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in

the

> > > > society.

> > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> > > > things. So for

> > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However,

it

> has a

> > > > role in

> > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> seeking

> > > > honor and

> > > > > respect in society.

> > > > >

> > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it

can

> bring

> > > > a balance

> > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> say: "Take

> > > > the Middle

> > > > > Path".

> > > > >

> > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > Bharat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this

poor

> fellow

> > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the

7th.

> House

> > > > is

> > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> have some

> > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but

inspite

> of

> > > > what it

> > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> implications

> > > > to

> > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

> Jupiter

> > > > and

> > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> terms per

> > > > say.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist

(Jup)

> > > > mentality

> > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact

that

> there

> > > > is

> > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

> theories.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist

council-

> now

> > > > that

> > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> individually.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a

completely

> > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> <nameisego@>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> Chhed

> > > > Karta

> > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

protection

> around

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My congratulations to both of you wonderful human beings: Arjun

Panditji and Tatvamasi ji! You have demonstrated how easy it is to

walk away from disagreement!

 

Bravo!!

 

RR

 

vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

<panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> dear tatvam ji

>

> yes, let us agree to this conclusion that you have your own

thoughts

> and i have my own thoughts and we respect each others thoughts and

> stop debating on your and my thoughts. of course we can keep

> discussing about the subject and concepts without proving your

> thinking is right or my thinking is right.

>

> with best wishes

> pandit arjun

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Arjun ji,

> >

> > You stick to your thinking and I will stick to mine.

> >

> > Ttavam-Asi

> >

> > About Shaankaracharya of Kanchi, his chart has been discussed

> and I have already posted my reading on him.

> >

> >

> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> > dear friends

> >

> > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling

> him

> > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more

> examples

> > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

> > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but

tatvam

> > ji too knows that they are far from truth.

> >

> > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the

killer

> > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that

> this

> > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the

> arrest

> > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

> > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

> >

> > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> > planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

> >

> > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

> >

> > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary

> status

> > and they are not planets.

> >

> > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

> > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books

are

> > not reckoned)

> >

> > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any

> exaltation

> > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results

either

> > for rasi or bhava.

> >

> > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that

> they

> > can project even the worst negative results in a positive

> language.

> > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes

to

> a

> > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits

> and

> > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

> > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his

bread

> > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these

in

> > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting

> that

> > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign

> land.

> > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is

colourful

> > presentation of negative things.

> >

> > truly rahu is known for deceit.

> >

> > with best wishes

> > pandit arjun

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Prafulla ji,

> > >

> > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you

> fail,

> > please let me know. I will send it to you.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > > Sir

> > >

> > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > > Good to read your views.

> > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are

> one

> > for me)

> > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal

> number

> > 142.

> > > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > > >

> > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I

> will

> > > reply back.

> > > >

> > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > > limitation is

> > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways.

> Therefore,

> > Rahu

> > > alone

> > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> > dwandhas -

> > > Pairs of

> > > > opposites like:

> > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > > 3. Future - Past

> > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > > and so on and on and on.....

> > > >

> > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of

> the

> > > space. It

> > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

> > name.

> > > It is

> > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> > Anantam.

> > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> > > Infact, it is

> > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> > Satya in the

> > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu

> can

> > > shock us

> > > > into our senses.

> > > >

> > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So

> we

> > > need the

> > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide

> with

> > the

> > > viveka

> > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > > Atmabala, Moon

> > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of

all

> in

> > > this, if

> > > > only we were to will it.

> > > >

> > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us,

> also

> > > releases

> > > > us due to the same Lord.

> > > >

> > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > > particular trait

> > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

> > The whole

> > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing

but

> > > MahaMaya. It

> > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

> > amounts to

> > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To

> the

> > > one who

> > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For

him,

> > the

> > > destiny

> > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear friend,

> > > > >

> > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be

> destroyed

> > > because

> > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> > Moon as my

> > > > > arguing point)

> > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North

> South

> > > magnatic

> > > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > > >

> > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > > >

> > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-

> Kaal

> > yog ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > >

> > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would

> be

> > starting

> > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > > >

> > > > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> > Astrology"

> > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow

the

> > nature

> > > > > that is

> > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

> > life and

> > > > > can it

> > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good

> by

> > many

> > > > > because it

> > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> > personality,

> > > > > dharma,

> > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

> > society,

> > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru

when

> > one

> > > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the

population.

> > > > > However, when it

> > > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in

> the

> > > > > society.

> > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the

bad

> > > > > things. So for

> > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However,

> it

> > has a

> > > > > role in

> > > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> > seeking

> > > > > honor and

> > > > > > respect in society.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it

> can

> > bring

> > > > > a balance

> > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> > say: "Take

> > > > > the Middle

> > > > > > Path".

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > Bharat

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this

> poor

> > fellow

> > > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the

> 7th.

> > House

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> > have some

> > > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but

> inspite

> > of

> > > > > what it

> > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> > implications

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route

of

> > Jupiter

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> > terms per

> > > > > say.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist

> (Jup)

> > > > > mentality

> > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact

> that

> > there

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

> > theories.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist

> council-

> > now

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that

the

> > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> > individually.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a

> completely

> > > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> > <nameisego@>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> > Chhed

> > > > > Karta

> > > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection

> > around

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dear prafulla ji

 

all your observations are correct.

 

one has a choice to become vidya sampanna or vastu sampanna. as

bhartruhari writes "ksheeyante khilabhushanani satatam vaak

bhushanam bhushanam" one has a choice of vaak bhushanam or suvarna

bhushanam, it is up to you how you measure the wealth.

 

with best wishes

pandit arjun

 

vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

<ripra_solutions wrote:

>

> Dear Pandit Arjun ji

>

> Let me clarify you, I am not for / against Jupiter. But did you

find

> it giving "big" materialistic results? I have not yet.

>

> In lighter note ( no offence), traditionally - astrology is taught,

> read and practised by Brahmin (satvik people) ruled by guru. If it

is

> dhankarka, how many of them have become millionaire, in current

times.

>

> Guru is often considered as dhan karka. In old days, wealth was

> knowledge / "gyan". Kings used to respect and gift tangible/

> intangible assets to learned pandits etc. and anyone, who was

learned

> used to have such blessings from society and kingdoms. So guru was

> rightly called dhan karka and guru dasha was hailed as the best

> possible dasha on the planet. Now the dynamics have changed in

current

> yuga, and guru (no doubt it is somya and satvik ) often fails to

> deliver materialistic success. In modern technology age (even from

> industrial age), knowledge has no role for wealth. and

materialistic

> results can be seen only from the other significators. Guru can be

one

> of the factor for an individual success, but can never be candidate

> for final say.

>

> Coming to guru chandala yoga (guru / rahu together) will render

> excellent materialistic results, for gyan now guided by rahu (moden

> yuga's ground rules - ambitions, big plans, growth, manipulation,

> competitive fierceness).

>

> Coming to another interesting observation - whenever transit rahu

is

> over guru and if at the same time transit guru over rahu - the

native

> faces very difficult times in terms of the materialistic pursuits.

>

> While reading so many charts, I observed (members may share their

> experience) -

>

> -venus, saturn, rahu renders much more wealth than guru

> -8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th

house

> -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days

> -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for

> materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be

critical

> for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house"

>

> there can be long list, which we may arrive at..and planets need

to be

> seen from current yuga's perspective. I repeat, no one factor will

> ever result an event, but when we want to mark the main candidate

for

> a result, watch out - jupiter is not geared for materialistic and

> competitive pursuits.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

> <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> >

> > dear friends

> >

> > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling

him

> > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more

examples

> > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the

child

> > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but

tatvam

> > ji too knows that they are far from truth.

> >

> > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the

killer

> > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that

this

> > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the

arrest

> > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that

nature

> > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

> >

> > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> > planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

> >

> > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

> >

> > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary

status

> > and they are not planets.

> >

> > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas

and

> > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books

are

> > not reckoned)

> >

> > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any

exaltation

> > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results

either

> > for rasi or bhava.

> >

> > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that

they

> > can project even the worst negative results in a positive

language.

> > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes

to a

> > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits

and

> > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead

of

> > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his

bread

> > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these

in

> > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting

that

> > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign

land.

> > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is

colourful

> > presentation of negative things.

> >

> > truly rahu is known for deceit.

> >

> > with best wishes

> > pandit arjun

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Prafulla ji,

> > >

> > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you

fail,

> > please let me know. I will send it to you.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > > Sir

> > >

> > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

<nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > > Good to read your views.

> > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are

one

> > for me)

> > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal

number

> > 142.

> > > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > > >

> > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I

will

> > > reply back.

> > > >

> > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > > limitation is

> > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways.

Therefore,

> > Rahu

> > > alone

> > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> > dwandhas -

> > > Pairs of

> > > > opposites like:

> > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > > 3. Future - Past

> > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > > and so on and on and on.....

> > > >

> > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview

of the

> > > space. It

> > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a

given

> > name.

> > > It is

> > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> > Anantam.

> > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and

satya.

> > > Infact, it is

> > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> > Satya in the

> > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness,

Rahu can

> > > shock us

> > > > into our senses.

> > > >

> > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses.

So we

> > > need the

> > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide

with

> > the

> > > viveka

> > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > > Atmabala, Moon

> > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of

all in

> > > this, if

> > > > only we were to will it.

> > > >

> > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us,

also

> > > releases

> > > > us due to the same Lord.

> > > >

> > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > > particular trait

> > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-

acceptance.

> > The whole

> > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing

but

> > > MahaMaya. It

> > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in

Nature

> > amounts to

> > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack.

To the

> > > one who

> > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For

him,

> > the

> > > destiny

> > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear friend,

> > > > >

> > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be

destroyed

> > > because

> > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> > Moon as my

> > > > > arguing point)

> > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North

South

> > > magnatic

> > > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > > >

> > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > > >

> > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-

Kaal

> > yog ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > >

> > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would

be

> > starting

> > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > > >

> > > > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> > Astrology"

> > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow

the

> > nature

> > > > > that is

> > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part

of

> > life and

> > > > > can it

> > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered

good by

> > many

> > > > > because it

> > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> > personality,

> > > > > dharma,

> > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and

the

> > society,

> > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru

when

> > one

> > > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the

population.

> > > > > However, when it

> > > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor

in the

> > > > > society.

> > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the

bad

> > > > > things. So for

> > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However,

it

> > has a

> > > > > role in

> > > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of

things

> > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> > seeking

> > > > > honor and

> > > > > > respect in society.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it

can

> > bring

> > > > > a balance

> > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> > say: "Take

> > > > > the Middle

> > > > > > Path".

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > Bharat

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this

poor

> > fellow

> > > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the

7th.

> > House

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> > have some

> > > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but

inspite

> > of

> > > > > what it

> > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> > implications

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route

of

> > Jupiter

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> > terms per

> > > > > say.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist

(Jup)

> > > > > mentality

> > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact

that

> > there

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in

either

> > theories.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist

council-

> > now

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that

the

> > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> > individually.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a

completely

> > > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> > <nameisego@>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> > Chhed

> > > > > Karta

> > > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

protection

> > around

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Souvik

 

Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

relative context.

 

Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but is

it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping factor

(if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be

working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise,

when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from technology,

industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented by "dhan

karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one

kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not represented

by jupiter.

 

Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in kendra /

trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

 

These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and their

dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully explained

by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter,

what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

 

Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success in

dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be

giving good results.

 

In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective for

kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been made

dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the

simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

favours.

 

Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and

find a rational conclusion.

 

regards / Prafulla Gang

 

vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

<explore_vulcan wrote:

>

> Respected member,

>

> Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> called Jupiter.

>

> Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House is

> ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> really good things to offer as well.

>

> Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what it

> is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications to

> Rahu.

>

> In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter and

> thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per say.

>

> Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup) mentality

> and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there is

> no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

>

> That is how the world is.

>

> However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now that

> is definitely an issue.

>

> Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

>

> However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> different turn.

>

> BTW, I have this yoga.

>

> Thanks

>

> Souvik

>

> vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Friends,

> >

> > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> >

> > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> >

> > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer of

> the place he occupies.

> >

> > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed Karta

> Hai.

> >

> > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Prafulla,

 

Many years ago, when I was a teenager, I had a friend Suresh. He was

born a vaishya (went on to become a lawyer) but he was one who was

raised on scriptures. His father (also a lawyer and a vrishchika

lagna) had the most extensive library of hindu scriptures and many

other books from all cultures.

 

Suresh, a dhanu with moon in eighth and jupiter in kumbha and sun in

mesha who was the main reason that I stayed on in jyotish (Thanks

Suresh!) taught me a big lesson when this jupitarian once during our

regular discussions stated: People ask for wealth, for health, for

beautiful brides and healthy and famous children. If God comes to me,

Ranjan, I will just ask for absolute and permanent contentment,

eternal santosh!"

 

RR

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

<ripra_solutions wrote:

>

> Dear Souvik

>

> Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

> they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> relative context.

>

> Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but

is

> it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

> jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

factor

> (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be

> working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise,

> when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

> other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

technology,

> industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

by "dhan

> karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one

> kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

represented

> by jupiter.

>

> Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

> associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

kendra /

> trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

>

> These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

their

> dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

explained

> by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter,

> what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

>

> Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success

in

> dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be

> giving good results.

>

> In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective

for

> kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been

made

> dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

> considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the

> simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

> favours.

>

> Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and

> find a rational conclusion.

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

>

> vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected member,

> >

> > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > called Jupiter.

> >

> > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

is

> > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > really good things to offer as well.

> >

> > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what

it

> > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

to

> > Rahu.

> >

> > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

and

> > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

say.

> >

> > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

mentality

> > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

is

> > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> >

> > That is how the world is.

> >

> > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

that

> > is definitely an issue.

> >

> > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> >

> > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > different turn.

> >

> > BTW, I have this yoga.

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Friends,

> > >

> > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > >

> > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > >

> > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer

of

> > the place he occupies.

> > >

> > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

Karta

> > Hai.

> > >

> > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Prafullaji,

 

I completely agree with you when you talk about "Sthana-Kaala-Patra"

considerations.

 

Did u know I am running a thread called "Practical Parasara" on my

group navlakshya to study the theories of Parasara with modern

charts in today's age and time. And believe me some things don't

work.

 

Yes, I agree with you when you say that "wealth" like many other

things in life is relative and its definition has changed over times.

 

But Prafulla ji, everything said and done, to ascribe Jupiter to a

completely material domain and assign Rahu as a full spiritual

planet does not stand the test of time.

 

Wouldn't this debate be more fruitful if we came up with examples of

real life instead of just theories?

 

BTW, please do join in my discussion on "Practical Parasara" on

navlakshya/

 

I would be glad to see u there...

 

Thanks

 

Souvik

 

vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

<ripra_solutions wrote:

>

> Dear Souvik

>

> Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

> they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> relative context.

>

> Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine,

but is

> it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

> jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

factor

> (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it

be

> working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and

likewise,

> when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

> other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

technology,

> industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

by "dhan

> karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars

(one

> kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

represented

> by jupiter.

>

> Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

> associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

kendra /

> trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

>

> These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

their

> dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

explained

> by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no

matter,

> what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

>

> Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success

in

> dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be

> giving good results.

>

> In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective

for

> kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been

made

> dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

> considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for

the

> simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

> favours.

>

> Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age

and

> find a rational conclusion.

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

>

> vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected member,

> >

> > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > called Jupiter.

> >

> > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

is

> > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > really good things to offer as well.

> >

> > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

what it

> > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

to

> > Rahu.

> >

> > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

and

> > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

say.

> >

> > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

mentality

> > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

is

> > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> >

> > That is how the world is.

> >

> > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

that

> > is definitely an issue.

> >

> > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> >

> > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > different turn.

> >

> > BTW, I have this yoga.

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Friends,

> > >

> > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > >

> > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > >

> > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

destroyer of

> > the place he occupies.

> > >

> > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

Karta

> > Hai.

> > >

> > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

around

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

BTW, I have not d to rahu / ketu for materialistic planets.

There are possibilities of them working positively for either of

pursuits. But yes, in my opinion, guru may be contributing by its

characteristics to the "wealth", but can not be singled out as main

candidate (even while being hailed as dhana karka) for wealth.

 

regards / Prafulla

vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

<explore_vulcan wrote:

>

> Dear Prafullaji,

>

> I completely agree with you when you talk about "Sthana-Kaala-Patra"

> considerations.

>

> Did u know I am running a thread called "Practical Parasara" on my

> group navlakshya to study the theories of Parasara with modern

> charts in today's age and time. And believe me some things don't

> work.

>

> Yes, I agree with you when you say that "wealth" like many other

> things in life is relative and its definition has changed over times.

>

> But Prafulla ji, everything said and done, to ascribe Jupiter to a

> completely material domain and assign Rahu as a full spiritual

> planet does not stand the test of time.

>

> Wouldn't this debate be more fruitful if we came up with examples of

> real life instead of just theories?

>

> BTW, please do join in my discussion on "Practical Parasara" on

> navlakshya/

>

> I would be glad to see u there...

>

> Thanks

>

> Souvik

>

> vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

> <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Souvik

> >

> > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

> > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> > relative context.

> >

> > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine,

> but is

> > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

> > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

> factor

> > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it

> be

> > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and

> likewise,

> > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

> > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

> technology,

> > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

> by "dhan

> > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars

> (one

> > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

> represented

> > by jupiter.

> >

> > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

> > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

> kendra /

> > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

> >

> > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

> their

> > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

> explained

> > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no

> matter,

> > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

> >

> > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success

> in

> > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be

> > giving good results.

> >

> > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective

> for

> > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been

> made

> > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

> > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for

> the

> > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

> > favours.

> >

> > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age

> and

> > find a rational conclusion.

> >

> > regards / Prafulla Gang

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> > <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected member,

> > >

> > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > > called Jupiter.

> > >

> > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

> is

> > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > > really good things to offer as well.

> > >

> > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

> what it

> > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

> to

> > > Rahu.

> > >

> > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

> and

> > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

> say.

> > >

> > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> mentality

> > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

> is

> > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> > >

> > > That is how the world is.

> > >

> > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

> that

> > > is definitely an issue.

> > >

> > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> > >

> > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > different turn.

> > >

> > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > >

> > > Souvik

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Friends,

> > > >

> > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > >

> > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> destroyer of

> > > the place he occupies.

> > > >

> > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

> Karta

> > > Hai.

> > > >

> > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

> around

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaskaar Sri Tatvam-Asiji

 

If I search for message number 142 on Vedic Astrology list, it only shows

message number 7721. I think has deleted earlier messages.

 

It would be nice if you can send me your message.

 

Thanks and Regards

Bharat

 

On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego > wrote:

>

> Sri Bharat ji,

> Good to read your views.

> May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are one for me)

> It would be intersting for you to read about Universal number 142.

> Then you will understand my thoughts.

> Tatvam-Asi

>

> Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology > wrote:

> Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

>

> It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I will reply

> back.

>

> Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that limitation is

> "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways. Therefore, Rahu alone

> cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the dwandhas - Pairs

> of

> opposites like:

> 1. Likes -Dislikes

> 2. Honour -Dishonour

> 3. Future - Past

> 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> and so on and on and on.....

>

> Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of the space.

> It

> is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given name. It is

> dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and Anantam.

> Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya. Infact, it

> is

> the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is Satya in the

> form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu can shock us

> into our senses.

>

> Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So we need the

> energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide with the viveka

> and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as Atmabala,

> Moon

> for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of all in this, if

> only we were to will it.

>

> The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us, also releases

> us due to the same Lord.

>

> Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a particular

> trait

> of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance. The whole

> nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing but MahaMaya.

> It

> is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature amounts to

> non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To the one who

> accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For him, the destiny

> and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

>

> Thanks and Regards

> Bharat

On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego > wrote:

> >

> > Dear friend,

> >

> > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> >

> > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be destroyed because

> > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of Moon as my

> > arguing point)

> > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North South magnatic

> > force which always exists in universe.

> >

> > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> >

> > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-Kaal yog ?

> >

> > Tatvam-Asi

> >

> > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would be starting

> > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> >

> > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan > wrote:

> > Namaskar Bharatji,

> >

> > I have always admired your posts...

> >

> > As always I could not agree any more :)

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu Astrology"

> > <hinduastrology wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > >

> > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow the nature

> > that is

> > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of life and

> > can it

> > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good by many

> > because it

> > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive personality,

> > dharma,

> > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the society,

> > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru when one

> > needs it. Now

> > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the population.

> > However, when it

> > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in the

> > society.

> > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > >

> > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the bad

> > things. So for

> > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However, it has a

> > role in

> > > Spirituality:

> > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of seeking

> > honor and

> > > respect in society.

> > >

> > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it can bring

> > a balance

> > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters say: "Take

> > the Middle

> > > Path".

> > >

> > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > >

> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected member,

> > > >

> > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > > > called Jupiter.

> > > >

> > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

> > is

> > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > >

> > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

> > what it

> > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

> > to

> > > > Rahu.

> > > >

> > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

> > and

> > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

> > say.

> > > >

> > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> > mentality

> > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

> > is

> > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> > > >

> > > > That is how the world is.

> > > >

> > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

> > that

> > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > >

> > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> > > >

> > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > > different turn.

> > > >

> > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks

> > > >

> > > > Souvik

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > > >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Friends,

> > > > >

> > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > >

> > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > destroyer of

> > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > >

> > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

> > Karta

> > > > Hai.

> > > > >

> > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > >

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Ranjan ji

 

Yes, I never disagree of the role of benefic Guru (and enjoy too with

exalted guru in my chart as well).

 

In fact, my contention was never against role of planet Guru (as the

thread might appear). I was just quesioning (probably dragged it

little further than required), if it works as dhana karka in the

current age.

 

Jupiter is certainly a somya planet and if benefic for a chart, will

bless with good things (e.g. its karkatavs - good children, eternal

peace, content life, religious pursuits, good karmic pursuits in this

life and satvik approach etc). And also do agree that not necessarily

"wealth" (as may be provided by other planets) can provide such nice

contentment.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

vedic astrology, "crystal pages"

<rohini_ranjan wrote:

>

> Dear Prafulla,

>

> Many years ago, when I was a teenager, I had a friend Suresh. He was

> born a vaishya (went on to become a lawyer) but he was one who was

> raised on scriptures. His father (also a lawyer and a vrishchika

> lagna) had the most extensive library of hindu scriptures and many

> other books from all cultures.

>

> Suresh, a dhanu with moon in eighth and jupiter in kumbha and sun in

> mesha who was the main reason that I stayed on in jyotish (Thanks

> Suresh!) taught me a big lesson when this jupitarian once during our

> regular discussions stated: People ask for wealth, for health, for

> beautiful brides and healthy and famous children. If God comes to me,

> Ranjan, I will just ask for absolute and permanent contentment,

> eternal santosh!"

>

> RR

>

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

> <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Souvik

> >

> > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

> > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> > relative context.

> >

> > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but

> is

> > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

> > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

> factor

> > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be

> > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise,

> > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

> > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

> technology,

> > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

> by "dhan

> > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one

> > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

> represented

> > by jupiter.

> >

> > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

> > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

> kendra /

> > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

> >

> > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

> their

> > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

> explained

> > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter,

> > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

> >

> > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success

> in

> > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be

> > giving good results.

> >

> > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective

> for

> > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been

> made

> > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

> > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the

> > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

> > favours.

> >

> > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and

> > find a rational conclusion.

> >

> > regards / Prafulla Gang

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> > <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected member,

> > >

> > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > > called Jupiter.

> > >

> > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

> is

> > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > > really good things to offer as well.

> > >

> > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what

> it

> > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

> to

> > > Rahu.

> > >

> > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

> and

> > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

> say.

> > >

> > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> mentality

> > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

> is

> > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> > >

> > > That is how the world is.

> > >

> > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

> that

> > > is definitely an issue.

> > >

> > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> > >

> > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > different turn.

> > >

> > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > >

> > > Souvik

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Friends,

> > > >

> > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > >

> > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer

> of

> > > the place he occupies.

> > > >

> > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

> Karta

> > > Hai.

> > > >

> > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Prafulla,

 

I think you have a point in the following:

 

"-8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th

house

> -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days

> -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for

> materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be

critical

> for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house"

 

I wish you would share your research knowledge with others in the

forum.

 

Thank you,

 

Blessings

 

Renu

>

 

 

vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

<ripra_solutions wrote:

>

> Dear Pandit Arjun ji

>

> Let me clarify you, I am not for / against Jupiter. But did you find

> it giving "big" materialistic results? I have not yet.

>

> In lighter note ( no offence), traditionally - astrology is taught,

> read and practised by Brahmin (satvik people) ruled by guru. If it

is

> dhankarka, how many of them have become millionaire, in current

times.

>

> Guru is often considered as dhan karka. In old days, wealth was

> knowledge / "gyan". Kings used to respect and gift tangible/

> intangible assets to learned pandits etc. and anyone, who was

learned

> used to have such blessings from society and kingdoms. So guru was

> rightly called dhan karka and guru dasha was hailed as the best

> possible dasha on the planet. Now the dynamics have changed in

current

> yuga, and guru (no doubt it is somya and satvik ) often fails to

> deliver materialistic success. In modern technology age (even from

> industrial age), knowledge has no role for wealth. and materialistic

> results can be seen only from the other significators. Guru can be

one

> of the factor for an individual success, but can never be candidate

> for final say.

>

> Coming to guru chandala yoga (guru / rahu together) will render

> excellent materialistic results, for gyan now guided by rahu (moden

> yuga's ground rules - ambitions, big plans, growth, manipulation,

> competitive fierceness).

>

> Coming to another interesting observation - whenever transit rahu is

> over guru and if at the same time transit guru over rahu - the

native

> faces very difficult times in terms of the materialistic pursuits.

>

> While reading so many charts, I observed (members may share their

> experience) -

>

> -venus, saturn, rahu renders much more wealth than guru

> -8th house is critical for big money compared to 2nd house / 11th

house

> -12th house is not as bad (foreign travels) as it was in old days

> -9th house is bhagya only related to dharma at large, not for

> materialistic pursuits ; in competitive age 3-6-10-11 will be

critical

> for success instead of mere bhagya - "9th house"

>

> there can be long list, which we may arrive at..and planets need to

be

> seen from current yuga's perspective. I repeat, no one factor will

> ever result an event, but when we want to mark the main candidate

for

> a result, watch out - jupiter is not geared for materialistic and

> competitive pursuits.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> vedic astrology, "panditarjun2004"

> <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> >

> > dear friends

> >

> > guru bashing is back again. to call guru a dagabaaz or calling

him

> > making a hole in the thali he eats (good god that few more

examples

> > were not used like the child killing the mother who fed the child

> > with milk) is all fine in the name of freedom of speech but

tatvam

> > ji too knows that they are far from truth.

> >

> > when astrologers and scientists alike failed to predict the

killer

> > tsunami that destroyed tamilnadu, very few people realised that

this

> > might have been the result of the anger of the gods after the

arrest

> > of his holiness shankaracharya jayendra saraswati ji. result of

> > guru bashing? it is clearly written in the shastras, that nature

> > would destroy the land where sages and saints are not respected.

> >

> > guru needs no advocates to show that he is the best amongst all

> > planets. however, let me put my own understanding:

> >

> > 1. as per astronomy, rahu and ketu are non-existing planets.

> >

> > 2. as per mythology, rahu and ketu were given only planetary

status

> > and they are not planets.

> >

> > 3. rahu and ketu do not form any yogas at all as per samhitas and

> > hence no conjunction results with rahu and ketu were given in

> > various samhitas written by sages. (medieval and modern books

are

> > not reckoned)

> >

> > 4. since rahu and ketu do not own any houses nor have any

exaltation

> > or debilitation points, they do not have individual results

either

> > for rasi or bhava.

> >

> > 5. rahu and ketu are first rank malefics which can only give

> > negative results. the best part of modern astrologers is that

they

> > can project even the worst negative results in a positive

language.

> > for example when few bhavas are spoilt by rahu, the person goes

to a

> > distant thrown off lands in a different religion, living habits

and

> > various things different to the native's homeland. so instead of

> > saying that the native goes to the farthest land to earn his

bread

> > and eke his livelihood as he could not succeed in getting these

in

> > his own homeland, the modern astrologers have started painting

that

> > if rahu is in this or that house or aspects or influences these

> > houses, the native succeeds or shines or settles in a foreign

land.

> > anyone can easily understand what is reality and what is

colourful

> > presentation of negative things.

> >

> > truly rahu is known for deceit.

> >

> > with best wishes

> > pandit arjun

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Prafulla ji,

> > >

> > > I think VA or JR has my work on Rahu in archives. If you

fail,

> > please let me know. I will send it to you.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > > Prafulla Gang <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > > Sir

> > >

> > > How can we access your work on rahu / ketu.

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sri Bharat ji,

> > > > Good to read your views.

> > > > May be you have not read my works on Rahu-Ketu .(They are

one

> > for me)

> > > > It would be intersting for you to read about Universal

number

> > 142.

> > > > Then you will understand my thoughts.

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > > Bharat Hindu Astrology <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > Namaskaar Sri Tatvam Asiji

> > > >

> > > > It is almost 3:00 AM and I am not yet asleep so I thought I

will

> > > reply back.

> > > >

> > > > Graha means that it seizes our thinking into believing that

> > > limitation is

> > > > "Reality". Different Grahas do it in different ways.

Therefore,

> > Rahu

> > > alone

> > > > cannot be Satya. However, Rahu-Ketu together signify the

> > dwandhas -

> > > Pairs of

> > > > opposites like:

> > > > 1. Likes -Dislikes

> > > > 2. Honour -Dishonour

> > > > 3. Future - Past

> > > > 4. Hapiness - Sorrow

> > > > and so on and on and on.....

> > > >

> > > > Rahu maybe the magnetic pole, but then it is under purview of

the

> > > space. It

> > > > is limited and not satya. Universe is Satya seen with a given

> > name.

> > > It is

> > > > dependent upon the qualities of Satya which are Jnanam and

> > Anantam.

> > > > Therefore, space and time always appear as infinite and satya.

> > > Infact, it is

> > > > the work of Rahu to make one feel that the seen Universe is

> > Satya in the

> > > > form that it is seen. By seeking Anantam in limitedness, Rahu

can

> > > shock us

> > > > into our senses.

> > > >

> > > > Many people are shocked but how many come to their senses. So

we

> > > need the

> > > > energy of Jupiter and Mercury wherein Mercury will provide

with

> > the

> > > viveka

> > > > and Jupiter as a Shiva Tatva in form of a guidance. Surya as

> > > Atmabala, Moon

> > > > for clarity, and Mars for courage. There is involvement of

all in

> > > this, if

> > > > only we were to will it.

> > > >

> > > > The very graha under instruction of the Lord that grasps us,

also

> > > releases

> > > > us due to the same Lord.

> > > >

> > > > Any grahas wrong effects are actually a non acceptance of a

> > > particular trait

> > > > of Nature. An individual is only tormented by non-acceptance.

> > The whole

> > > > nature is called Prakriti in Hindi. The Prakriti is nothing

but

> > > MahaMaya. It

> > > > is nothing but Ma Durga. Non-acceptance of anything in Nature

> > amounts to

> > > > non-acceptance of Mahamaya. It is then, the grahas attack. To

the

> > > one who

> > > > accepts, who flows with Ma - the Ma is the protector. For

him,

> > the

> > > destiny

> > > > and grahas remain only namesake for the body.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > Bharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 5/22/06, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear friend,

> > > > >

> > > > > Good post from you and Bharat ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > However, Guru is destructible and Rahu can never be

destroyed

> > > because

> > > > > Rahu is Satya, The Truth. (Don't take the Rahu the node of

> > Moon as my

> > > > > arguing point)

> > > > > Rahu as per my thinking stands for that universal North

South

> > > magnatic

> > > > > force which always exists in universe.

> > > > >

> > > > > That is why Satya is known as SHASHWAT SATYA.

> > > > >

> > > > > Why not call the combination as Guru-Satya yog or Guru-

Kaal

> > yog ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > >

> > > > > By the way, you also have GTY in 7th house.And you would

be

> > starting

> > > > > Rahu dasa in 2008.

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > Namaskar Bharatji,

> > > > >

> > > > > I have always admired your posts...

> > > > >

> > > > > As always I could not agree any more :)

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Souvik

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology, "Bharat Hindu

> > Astrology"

> > > > > <hinduastrology@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Grahas are not to be labelled good or bad. They follow

the

> > nature

> > > > > that is

> > > > > > provided to them by the Lord. It is us who choose part of

> > life and

> > > > > can it

> > > > > > good. The other half we call bad. Guru is considered good

by

> > many

> > > > > because it

> > > > > > bestows prosperity, children, popularity, expansive

> > personality,

> > > > > dharma,

> > > > > > initiation of projects for the benefit of oneself and the

> > society,

> > > > > > strengthens memory, gives education, finds you a guru

when

> > one

> > > > > needs it. Now

> > > > > > all these things are very good for 99.5% of the

population.

> > > > > However, when it

> > > > > > comes to Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. Guru can bring great attachment to the embodied Guru.

> > > > > > 2. It makes one not question the Guru.

> > > > > > 3. It makes one caught up in seeking respect and honor in

the

> > > > > society.

> > > > > > 4. It makes one enforce one's beliefs on others.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now what does Rahu do - I am sure most can list all the

bad

> > > > > things. So for

> > > > > > 99.5% of the population Rahu is defined as bad. However,

it

> > has a

> > > > > role in

> > > > > > Spirituality:

> > > > > > 1. It bestows knowledge of the transitory nature of things

> > > > > > 2. It questions the Guru to understand different points.

> > > > > > 3. Where there is autocracy, it brings revolution.

> > > > > > 4. It never makes one caught up in the endless circle of

> > seeking

> > > > > honor and

> > > > > > respect in society.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When both are together, if with other combinations - it

can

> > bring

> > > > > a balance

> > > > > > of two opposing forces. What do most spiritual masters

> > say: "Take

> > > > > the Middle

> > > > > > Path".

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You have the combination, you would know what I mean.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > Bharat

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 5/22/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected member,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this

poor

> > fellow

> > > > > > > called Jupiter.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the

7th.

> > House

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does

> > have some

> > > > > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but

inspite

> > of

> > > > > what it

> > > > > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

> > implications

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > Rahu.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route

of

> > Jupiter

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in

> > terms per

> > > > > say.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist

(Jup)

> > > > > mentality

> > > > > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact

that

> > there

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

> > theories.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > That is how the world is.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist

council-

> > now

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that

the

> > > > > > > combination is not the best of things to happen

> > individually.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a

completely

> > > > > > > different turn.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

> > <nameisego@>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Friends,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> > > > > destroyer of

> > > > > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein

> > Chhed

> > > > > Karta

> > > > > > > Hai.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

protection

> > around

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear learned members,

 

I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good'

or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined

paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our

past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn and

so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself

but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is

what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us

good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who

are responsible for our own karma.

 

Blessings,

 

Renuji

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

<ripra_solutions wrote:

>

> Dear Souvik

>

> Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

> they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> relative context.

>

> Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine, but

is

> it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

> jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

factor

> (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it be

> working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and likewise,

> when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

> other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

technology,

> industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

by "dhan

> karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars (one

> kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

represented

> by jupiter.

>

> Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

> associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

kendra /

> trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

>

> These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

their

> dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

explained

> by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no matter,

> what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

>

> Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly success

in

> dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to be

> giving good results.

>

> In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective

for

> kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been

made

> dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

> considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for the

> simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

> favours.

>

> Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age and

> find a rational conclusion.

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

>

> vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected member,

> >

> > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor fellow

> > called Jupiter.

> >

> > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

is

> > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have some

> > really good things to offer as well.

> >

> > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of what

it

> > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

to

> > Rahu.

> >

> > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of Jupiter

and

> > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

say.

> >

> > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

mentality

> > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that there

is

> > no good in either or that there are no faults in either theories.

> >

> > That is how the world is.

> >

> > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

that

> > is definitely an issue.

> >

> > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> >

> > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > different turn.

> >

> > BTW, I have this yoga.

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Friends,

> > >

> > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > >

> > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > >

> > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and destroyer

of

> > the place he occupies.

> > >

> > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

Karta

> > Hai.

> > >

> > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > >

> > > Tatvam-Asi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Renuji,

 

Parashara did and all the ancient jyotishis and rishis, and even

later day saints, in the 16th century and even modern jyotish

teachers right down to the 1980s and 90s!

 

I know some of the modern western/tropical astrologer/psychologists

have tried very hard to move away from what they call the black and

white and doom and gloom labelling and perhaps you have been

influenced by their writings.

 

Really, it just sounds more ominous in the way the texts are

translated. There are plenty of jyotish writings that get you so

close to the 'black' that your *eye* begins to see the "grey" even in

those blacks!

 

How many jyotish explorers really get so close to or are willing to

get so close to the black to see the grey that is there?

 

But as far as Sages are concerned -- Sorry, but you are on your own

on this one! I am not going against all those formidable Sages!

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw wrote:

>

> Dear learned members,

>

> I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good'

> or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined

> paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our

> past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn

and

> so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself

> but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is

> what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us

> good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who

> are responsible for our own karma.

>

> Blessings,

>

> Renuji

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

> <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Souvik

> >

> > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet, if

> > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> > relative context.

> >

> > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine,

but

> is

> > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we find

> > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

> factor

> > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can it

be

> > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and

likewise,

> > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often ignore

> > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

> technology,

> > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

> by "dhan

> > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars

(one

> > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

> represented

> > by jupiter.

> >

> > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha - if

> > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

> kendra /

> > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

> >

> > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

> their

> > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

> explained

> > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no

matter,

> > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

> >

> > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly

success

> in

> > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed to

be

> > giving good results.

> >

> > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but collective

> for

> > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have been

> made

> > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual was

> > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status, for

the

> > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by royal

> > favours.

> >

> > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current age

and

> > find a rational conclusion.

> >

> > regards / Prafulla Gang

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> > <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected member,

> > >

> > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor

fellow

> > > called Jupiter.

> > >

> > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th. House

> is

> > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have

some

> > > really good things to offer as well.

> > >

> > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

what

> it

> > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its implications

> to

> > > Rahu.

> > >

> > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

Jupiter

> and

> > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms per

> say.

> > >

> > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> mentality

> > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that

there

> is

> > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

theories.

> > >

> > > That is how the world is.

> > >

> > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council- now

> that

> > > is definitely an issue.

> > >

> > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> > >

> > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > different turn.

> > >

> > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > >

> > > Souvik

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi <nameisego@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Friends,

> > > >

> > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > >

> > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > >

> > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

destroyer

> of

> > > the place he occupies.

> > > >

> > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

> Karta

> > > Hai.

> > > >

> > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > >

> > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

around

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Members,

I do not have the knowledge in astrology to contribute or critically examine

the propositions of learned members. This topic of Guru-Chandal lead me to a

story about Jagadguru Adi Shankaracharya. I reproduce the pertinent parts

below for those interested( Most of you might know this already....) .

Sorry for this non astrological post.

 

The following is taken from the site with address ;

http://www.exoticindiaart.com/article/shankaracharya

 

Start

 

Confrontation with an Untouchable

 

One scorching day of summer, the worthy saint and his followers

were going to bathe in the river Ganges at the Manikarna ghat. On

their way, the party encountered a chandal (keeper of cremation

grounds) who is considered the lowest amongst lowest in the

hierarchy of Indian castes. Accompanying the outcaste were his

four repulsive dogs. Addressing the untouchable, Shankaracharya

asked him to move away and make way for them. The hunter then

raised some interesting questions:

 

"You are always going about preaching that the Vedas teach the

non dual Brahman to be the only reality which is immutable and

unpollutable. If this is so how has this sense of difference

overtaken you? There are hundreds of yogis going around indulging

in high sounding philosophical talk, donning the ochre robe and

exhibiting other insignia of holy life like the water pot and

staff. But not even a ray of knowledge having found entrance into

their hearts, their holy exterior serves only to dupe

householders. You have asked me to move aside and make way for

you. To whom were your words addressed O learned Sir? To the body

which comes from the same source and performs the same functions

in the case of both a brahmin (the highest caste) and an

outcaste? Or to the atman (soul), which too is the same in all,

unaffected by anything material like the body? How do such

differences as 'this is a brahmin, or this is an outcaste,' arise

in the essentially non-dual world, which is the philosophy you

preach. O revered teacher, is the sun changed in the least, if it

reflects in the liquor pot or in the holy Ganga? How can you

indulge in such false sentiments as 'Being a brahmin I am pure;

and you, dog-eater, must therefore give way for me,' when the

truth is that the one universal and unblemishable bodiless spirit

is shining alike in each of our physical forms. Forgetting, due

to false attachment, one's own true nature as the material-less

spirit - beyond thoughts and words, unmanifest, beginningless,

endless and pure - how indeed have you come to identify yourself

with the body which is but unsteady like the ears of an elephant."

 

It is believed that the chandala was none other than Lord Shiva

in disguise, and the four canines the four Vedas. The sage

immediately fell to the feet of the outcaste and composed there a

quintad of scintillating verses, called the 'Manishapanchakam,'

summing up the absolute truth as follows:

 

>*From the standpoint of the body, O Shiva, I am thy servant;

*from the standpoint of the soul, O Thou with three eyes, I become

a part of Thine; and

O the Self of all, from the standpoint of the Self, I am verily

Thou:

This is my settled conclusion reached with the help of all

shastras.

 

End.

 

 

On 5/22/06, renunw <renunw (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

>

> Dear learned members,

>

> I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good'

> or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined

> paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of our

> past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn and

> so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet itself

> but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is

> what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring us

> good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves who

> are responsible for our own karma.

>

> Blessings,

>

> Renuji

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Rohiniji,

 

I am sorry if you misunderstood. I do not have any question regarding

the teachings of ancient rishis. I do love astrlogy too. I am a

Buddhist thus I believe that 'good' and 'bad' we have to face in this

life are results of our past 'karmas'.

 

Blessings to you my friend,

 

Renuji

 

vedic astrology, "Rohini (Crystal Pages)"

<clarity2020 wrote:

>

> Dear Renuji,

>

> Parashara did and all the ancient jyotishis and rishis, and even

> later day saints, in the 16th century and even modern jyotish

> teachers right down to the 1980s and 90s!

>

> I know some of the modern western/tropical astrologer/psychologists

> have tried very hard to move away from what they call the black and

> white and doom and gloom labelling and perhaps you have been

> influenced by their writings.

>

> Really, it just sounds more ominous in the way the texts are

> translated. There are plenty of jyotish writings that get you so

> close to the 'black' that your *eye* begins to see the "grey" even

in

> those blacks!

>

> How many jyotish explorers really get so close to or are willing to

> get so close to the black to see the grey that is there?

>

> But as far as Sages are concerned -- Sorry, but you are on your own

> on this one! I am not going against all those formidable Sages!

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear learned members,

> >

> > I do not understand why anyone would classify planets as 'good'

> > or 'bad'. Aren't they heavenly bodies which show us our destined

> > paths? Isn't it we humans who become good or bad as a result of

our

> > past deeds? Jupiter is Jupiter, Rahu is Rahu and Saturn is Saturn

> and

> > so on and so forth. It is my view that it is not the planet

itself

> > but it's specific placement in the zodiac at our time of birth is

> > what depicts our lives in this earth. None of the plantes bring

us

> > good or bad or benefic or malefic results. It is we, ourselves

who

> > are responsible for our own karma.

> >

> > Blessings,

> >

> > Renuji

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

> > <ripra_solutions@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Souvik

> > >

> > > Jupiter is not a bad planet; in fact no planet is a bad planet,

if

> > > they are respresented by gods / symbolic attributes. It is their

> > > respective role for a chart / event, which is being discussed in

> > > relative context.

> > >

> > > Jupiter is satvik planet, blesses with knowledge etc..all fine,

> but

> > is

> > > it a main candidate for worldly pursuits. Very often, when we

find

> > > jupiter not giving "desired" results, we find some overlapping

> > factor

> > > (if jupiter is most benefic for dhana related results, how can

it

> be

> > > working in reverse direction, by any minor influences) and

> likewise,

> > > when jupiter is seem to be giving benefic results, we often

ignore

> > > other key significators. In modern age - wealth flows from

> > technology,

> > > industry, war, commerce etc, and none of them are represented

> > by "dhan

> > > karka Jupiter". Even in old days, wealth used to flow from wars

> (one

> > > kingdom winning another kingdom) and commerce - again not

> > represented

> > > by jupiter.

> > >

> > > Rahu / Ketu has never been depicted even by Parashar as outright

> > > ashubha planet (though may be cruel). They work as yoga graha -

if

> > > associated with a yoga karka planet (for specific native) in

> > kendra /

> > > trikona. and if not so, they are ashubha.

> > >

> > > These two planets are considered as karmic planets as well (and

> > their

> > > dispositors - karmic controlling planets). It is beautifully

> > explained

> > > by Late Shri Manik Chand Jain in his two books. The fact (no

> matter,

> > > what we assume) remains that our birth is result of past karmas.

> > >

> > > Many may not agree for even ketu's potential of big wordly

> success

> > in

> > > dasha / bhukti, but with the above definition, it is observed

to

> be

> > > giving good results.

> > >

> > > In old days, wealth never used to individualistic, but

collective

> > for

> > > kingdom or family. Jupiter being karka of family, might have

been

> > made

> > > dhan karka then? and based upon family status only, individual

was

> > > considered wealthy or poor. Jupiter is also karka of status,

for

> the

> > > simple fact that those days, knowledge used to be blessed by

royal

> > > favours.

> > >

> > > Please do not construe that, i am against jupiter. I am just

> > > requesting to relook into planetary significators in current

age

> and

> > > find a rational conclusion.

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla Gang

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "Souvik Dutta"

> > > <explore_vulcan@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected member,

> > > >

> > > > Don't you think you are being hyper-critical of this poor

> fellow

> > > > called Jupiter.

> > > >

> > > > Agreed his extra-potency in the form of Indra in the 7th.

House

> > is

> > > > ever eager to father many children but the fellow does have

> some

> > > > really good things to offer as well.

> > > >

> > > > Chandal is an outcaste, nothing wrong with it but inspite of

> what

> > it

> > > > is the name cannot change and so cannot change its

implications

> > to

> > > > Rahu.

> > > >

> > > > In the Kaalchakra Rahu invariably obstructs the route of

> Jupiter

> > and

> > > > thus Guru Chandal is definitely not something good in terms

per

> > say.

> > > >

> > > > Communists(Sat) have for time always hated Capitalist(Jup)

> > mentality

> > > > and vice versa. However, that doesn't change the fact that

> there

> > is

> > > > no good in either or that there are no faults in either

> theories.

> > > >

> > > > That is how the world is.

> > > >

> > > > However, having a communist leader is a capitalist council-

now

> > that

> > > > is definitely an issue.

> > > >

> > > > Similarly there is no issue in Rah or Guru, just that the

> > > > combination is not the best of things to happen individually.

> > > >

> > > > However, when you take lordships this may take a completely

> > > > different turn.

> > > >

> > > > BTW, I have this yoga.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks

> > > >

> > > > Souvik

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, Tatvam-Asi

<nameisego@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Friends,

> > > > >

> > > > > Why should it be known as GURU-CHANDAL yog ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Chandal is Harischandra Raja who indicates Truth.

> > > > >

> > > > > Guru on the other hand is pompous, double faced and

> destroyer

> > of

> > > > the place he occupies.

> > > > >

> > > > > As they say, " Jis Thali Mein Khaata hai, Usi mein Chhed

> > Karta

> > > > Hai.

> > > > >

> > > > > I would prefer to call it as RAHU-DAGABAAZ yog.

> > > > >

> > > > > Tatvam-Asi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

> around

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...