Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Dear Visti, I will post the birth data of the chart I am referring to when I am informed of a reliable set but the question is as follows. In the absence of any real malefic factors, how far would a strong Neechabhanga Rajayoga go to protect the longevity of marriage for a Stree Jatak if the 2nd Lord from Upapada is debilitated in the 10th House from Uday Lagna and in the 12th Bhava from the AL. I appreciate it is a bit of a shot in the dark in the absence of birth data but I myself do not have it with any degree of accuracy and will need extensive rectification to arrive at the correct Navamsha Lagna. It is a Mesha Lagna Chart with Shukra-Mangal in the Dwadasha Bhava. Upapada Lagna is in the 8th with Shani and Guru the lord of 2nd from the Upapada is in the 10th House. Uday Lagna also has Chandra-Rahu. Budh-Surya are in the Arudha Lagna in the 11th Bhava. The Jatak is a brilliant student but the debility of Guru causes worry for progeny (being in the Maraka Bhava from the controlling Bhava for progeny as the 9th Lord) and the length of marriage. In Navamsha, without being sure of the Amsha Bhava, Guru-Chandra are together in Mesha Navamsha. The spouse would be likely be significantly older. How far does the Neechabhanga go to alleviate the situation regarding the length of the first marriage, especially when Guru is in the 12th from the Arudha Lagna. Regards. Anurag. ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Anurag, Namaskar Comeon why are you playing games with us? I'm less likely to look at your mail and instead read some of the other MANY MANY mails when you write such things. Either give us the chart or don't ask. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 21 May 2006 20:40 [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL Dear Visti, I will post the birth data of the chart I am referring to when I am informed of a reliable set but the question is as follows. In the absence of any real malefic factors, how far would a strong Neechabhanga Rajayoga go to protect the longevity of marriage for a Stree Jatak if the 2nd Lord from Upapada is debilitated in the 10th House from Uday Lagna and in the 12th Bhava from the AL. I appreciate it is a bit of a shot in the dark in the absence of birth data but I myself do not have it with any degree of accuracy and will need extensive rectification to arrive at the correct Navamsha Lagna. It is a Mesha Lagna Chart with Shukra-Mangal in the Dwadasha Bhava. Upapada Lagna is in the 8th with Shani and Guru the lord of 2nd from the Upapada is in the 10th House. Uday Lagna also has Chandra-Rahu. Budh-Surya are in the Arudha Lagna in the 11th Bhava. The Jatak is a brilliant student but the debility of Guru causes worry for progeny (being in the Maraka Bhava from the controlling Bhava for progeny as the 9th Lord) and the length of marriage. In Navamsha, without being sure of the Amsha Bhava, Guru-Chandra are together in Mesha Navamsha. The spouse would be likely be significantly older. How far does the Neechabhanga go to alleviate the situation regarding the length of the first marriage, especially when Guru is in the 12th from the Arudha Lagna. Regards. Anurag. ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Dear Visti, No games at all here. I wonder why you thought of it that way. In any case, that was not the intention. The unrectified details are here. Only the Rashi Chart can be taken as confirmed. Female;February 24, 1985;9:15 AM (tentative); Lucknow, India. Best wishes. Anurag. , "Visti Larsen" <visti> wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > Comeon why are you playing games with us? I'm less likely to look at your > mail and instead read some of the other MANY MANY mails when you write such > things. > Either give us the chart or don't ask. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 > 21 May 2006 20:40 > > [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL > > Dear Visti, > > I will post the birth data of the chart I am referring to when I am > informed of a reliable set but the question is as follows. > > In the absence of any real malefic factors, how far would a strong > Neechabhanga Rajayoga go to protect the longevity of marriage for a > Stree Jatak if the 2nd Lord from Upapada is debilitated in the 10th > House from Uday Lagna and in the 12th Bhava from the AL. > > I appreciate it is a bit of a shot in the dark in the absence of > birth data but I myself do not have it with any degree of accuracy > and will need extensive rectification to arrive at the correct > Navamsha Lagna. > > It is a Mesha Lagna Chart with Shukra-Mangal in the Dwadasha Bhava. > Upapada Lagna is in the 8th with Shani and Guru the lord of 2nd from > the Upapada is in the 10th House. Uday Lagna also has Chandra- Rahu. > Budh-Surya are in the Arudha Lagna in the 11th Bhava. > > The Jatak is a brilliant student but the debility of Guru causes > worry for progeny (being in the Maraka Bhava from the controlling > Bhava for progeny as the 9th Lord) and the length of marriage. In > Navamsha, without being sure of the Amsha Bhava, Guru-Chandra are > together in Mesha Navamsha. > > The spouse would be likely be significantly older. > > How far does the Neechabhanga go to alleviate the situation > regarding the length of the first marriage, especially when Guru is > in the 12th from the Arudha Lagna. > > Regards. > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Dear Visti, In the face of your somewhat curt directive: 'Either give us the chart or don't ask' I am constrained to explain the circumstances which lead me to exhibit less than the fullest confidence in the birth data. The parents of the siblings (The stree Jatak is one of them) are not particularly Jyotish-conscious, so much so that they have interchanged the time of birth of one of the brothers and this Jatak on a previous occasion. However, I remembered the Rashi Chakra from a previous occasion when I had cast it on JHL on another computer. I transferred a lot of data on to my Laptop manually and not with a pen drive. The charts of this family were not amongst those transferred. I am not in a position at the present time to confirm the birth data but do wish to study at least the Rashi Chakra of this Jatak. I wish I had not been accused of playing games before checking the facts. Far from it, I am utilising my time away from legal work in listening to MP3 recordings, especially from your site. To confide in you, I am a bit flustered by the comment. I don't particularly like to be viewed as someone who is interested in wasting your time without reason. In fact I don't write much on the lists and try to absorb the wisdom that comes from the adept in Jyotish for this very reason. People tend to spend time in aggression, misunderstandings, resolving comments when the purpose is entirely different. It was not my intention to put you out or to play 'games'. Best wishes. Anurag. , "Visti Larsen" <visti> wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > Comeon why are you playing games with us? I'm less likely to look at your > mail and instead read some of the other MANY MANY mails when you write such > things. > Either give us the chart or don't ask. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 > 21 May 2006 20:40 > > [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL > > Dear Visti, > > I will post the birth data of the chart I am referring to when I am > informed of a reliable set but the question is as follows. > > In the absence of any real malefic factors, how far would a strong > Neechabhanga Rajayoga go to protect the longevity of marriage for a > Stree Jatak if the 2nd Lord from Upapada is debilitated in the 10th > House from Uday Lagna and in the 12th Bhava from the AL. > > I appreciate it is a bit of a shot in the dark in the absence of > birth data but I myself do not have it with any degree of accuracy > and will need extensive rectification to arrive at the correct > Navamsha Lagna. > > It is a Mesha Lagna Chart with Shukra-Mangal in the Dwadasha Bhava. > Upapada Lagna is in the 8th with Shani and Guru the lord of 2nd from > the Upapada is in the 10th House. Uday Lagna also has Chandra- Rahu. > Budh-Surya are in the Arudha Lagna in the 11th Bhava. > > The Jatak is a brilliant student but the debility of Guru causes > worry for progeny (being in the Maraka Bhava from the controlling > Bhava for progeny as the 9th Lord) and the length of marriage. In > Navamsha, without being sure of the Amsha Bhava, Guru-Chandra are > together in Mesha Navamsha. > > The spouse would be likely be significantly older. > > How far does the Neechabhanga go to alleviate the situation > regarding the length of the first marriage, especially when Guru is > in the 12th from the Arudha Lagna. > > Regards. > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Anurag, Namaskar Sorry for hurting you. I wanted to make a point, not particularly to you but to others also, who may write ten questions in a mail and expect others to answer all of them. In other words, make it easy for others by making your own writing easier on the eyes. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 23 May 2006 20:32 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL Dear Visti, In the face of your somewhat curt directive: 'Either give us the chart or don't ask' I am constrained to explain the circumstances which lead me to exhibit less than the fullest confidence in the birth data. The parents of the siblings (The stree Jatak is one of them) are not particularly Jyotish-conscious, so much so that they have interchanged the time of birth of one of the brothers and this Jatak on a previous occasion. However, I remembered the Rashi Chakra from a previous occasion when I had cast it on JHL on another computer. I transferred a lot of data on to my Laptop manually and not with a pen drive. The charts of this family were not amongst those transferred. I am not in a position at the present time to confirm the birth data but do wish to study at least the Rashi Chakra of this Jatak. I wish I had not been accused of playing games before checking the facts. Far from it, I am utilising my time away from legal work in listening to MP3 recordings, especially from your site. To confide in you, I am a bit flustered by the comment. I don't particularly like to be viewed as someone who is interested in wasting your time without reason. In fact I don't write much on the lists and try to absorb the wisdom that comes from the adept in Jyotish for this very reason. People tend to spend time in aggression, misunderstandings, resolving comments when the purpose is entirely different. It was not my intention to put you out or to play 'games'. Best wishes. Anurag. , "Visti Larsen" <visti> wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > Comeon why are you playing games with us? I'm less likely to look at your > mail and instead read some of the other MANY MANY mails when you write such > things. > Either give us the chart or don't ask. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 > 21 May 2006 20:40 > > [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL > > Dear Visti, > > I will post the birth data of the chart I am referring to when I am > informed of a reliable set but the question is as follows. > > In the absence of any real malefic factors, how far would a strong > Neechabhanga Rajayoga go to protect the longevity of marriage for a > Stree Jatak if the 2nd Lord from Upapada is debilitated in the 10th > House from Uday Lagna and in the 12th Bhava from the AL. > > I appreciate it is a bit of a shot in the dark in the absence of > birth data but I myself do not have it with any degree of accuracy > and will need extensive rectification to arrive at the correct > Navamsha Lagna. > > It is a Mesha Lagna Chart with Shukra-Mangal in the Dwadasha Bhava. > Upapada Lagna is in the 8th with Shani and Guru the lord of 2nd from > the Upapada is in the 10th House. Uday Lagna also has Chandra- Rahu. > Budh-Surya are in the Arudha Lagna in the 11th Bhava. > > The Jatak is a brilliant student but the debility of Guru causes > worry for progeny (being in the Maraka Bhava from the controlling > Bhava for progeny as the 9th Lord) and the length of marriage. In > Navamsha, without being sure of the Amsha Bhava, Guru-Chandra are > together in Mesha Navamsha. > > The spouse would be likely be significantly older. > > How far does the Neechabhanga go to alleviate the situation > regarding the length of the first marriage, especially when Guru is > in the 12th from the Arudha Lagna. > > Regards. > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Dear Visti, That's alright then. I only wrote a bit about the Jatak because I specifically wanted to 'compensate' for the want of clarity that would accompany accurate birth data. In the said e-mail, the focus is only on the 2nd Lord from UL and because it is Guru, Neecha in the 2nd from the 9th, on progeny. The questions are only two and nowhere near ten, at least not in this instance. Best wishes. Anurag Sharma. , "Visti Larsen" <visti> wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > Sorry for hurting you. I wanted to make a point, not particularly to you but > to others also, who may write ten questions in a mail and expect others to > answer all of them. > In other words, make it easy for others by making your own writing easier on > the eyes. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 > 23 May 2006 20:32 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL > > Dear Visti, > > In the face of your somewhat curt directive: 'Either give us the > chart or don't ask' I am constrained to explain the circumstances > which lead me to exhibit less than the fullest confidence in the > birth data. The parents of the siblings (The stree Jatak is one of > them) are not particularly Jyotish-conscious, so much so that they > have interchanged the time of birth of one of the brothers and this > Jatak on a previous occasion. However, I remembered the Rashi Chakra > from a previous occasion when I had cast it on JHL on another > computer. > > I transferred a lot of data on to my Laptop manually and not with a > pen drive. The charts of this family were not amongst those > transferred. I am not in a position at the present time to confirm > the birth data but do wish to study at least the Rashi Chakra of > this Jatak. > > I wish I had not been accused of playing games before checking the > facts. Far from it, I am utilising my time away from legal work in > listening to MP3 > recordings, especially from your site. > > To confide in you, I am a bit flustered by the comment. I don't > particularly like to be viewed as someone who is interested in > wasting your time without reason. > > In fact I don't write much on the lists and try to absorb the wisdom > that comes from the adept in Jyotish for this very reason. People > tend to spend time in aggression, misunderstandings, resolving > comments when the purpose is entirely different. > > It was not my intention to put you out or to play 'games'. > > Best wishes. > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Anurag, Namaskar > > Comeon why are you playing games with us? I'm less likely to look > at your > > mail and instead read some of the other MANY MANY mails when you > write such > > things. > > Either give us the chart or don't ask. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of anuraagsharma27 > > 21 May 2006 20:40 > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] 2nd Lord from UL > > > > Dear Visti, > > > > I will post the birth data of the chart I am referring to when I > am > > informed of a reliable set but the question is as follows. > > > > In the absence of any real malefic factors, how far would a strong > > Neechabhanga Rajayoga go to protect the longevity of marriage for > a > > Stree Jatak if the 2nd Lord from Upapada is debilitated in the > 10th > > House from Uday Lagna and in the 12th Bhava from the AL. > > > > I appreciate it is a bit of a shot in the dark in the absence of > > birth data but I myself do not have it with any degree of accuracy > > and will need extensive rectification to arrive at the correct > > Navamsha Lagna. > > > > It is a Mesha Lagna Chart with Shukra-Mangal in the Dwadasha > Bhava. > > Upapada Lagna is in the 8th with Shani and Guru the lord of 2nd > from > > the Upapada is in the 10th House. Uday Lagna also has Chandra- > Rahu. > > Budh-Surya are in the Arudha Lagna in the 11th Bhava. > > > > The Jatak is a brilliant student but the debility of Guru causes > > worry for progeny (being in the Maraka Bhava from the controlling > > Bhava for progeny as the 9th Lord) and the length of marriage. In > > Navamsha, without being sure of the Amsha Bhava, Guru-Chandra are > > together in Mesha Navamsha. > > > > The spouse would be likely be significantly older. > > > > How far does the Neechabhanga go to alleviate the situation > > regarding the length of the first marriage, especially when Guru > is > > in the 12th from the Arudha Lagna. > > > > Regards. > > > > Anurag. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading today > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Dear Visti ji, i am sorry that i am troubling you, but the matter is intense and urgent. so kindly forgive and help. this is in regard to the problems in the marriage of this lady whose data i am putting inthe end of the mail. She was married on 17th NOV 2005.. .. at the age of 39. but she started feeling suffocated in less then two months. she feels there is no compatibility between the two , not even any kind of dialogue or communication is there.. she has become very suspicious regarding her husband's character but has no solid proof. is going through lot of pain and is deeply depressed and frustrated.every problem seems from her side . Are her fears true ? what would you advise.. should she continue or be separated ? For now ,she feels it's better to break off but as you know arranged marriages involve families and this is not easy to take divorce. she doeas'nt know what to do, is relectant to go back. she just want to know the fate of this marriage as well as her own. her spouse is already a divorcee who was first married around 1996 andperhaps seperated in 2000. reasons are not known to her. also what are the chances of progeny. i am giving details and hope you will respond instantly as usual. FEMALE : DOB : 1 OCT 1967 TOB: 1:52 PM POB : AMBALA [haryana,India] asc : saggie22-56 Husband : DOB: 4 JULY1969 TOB: 12 :15 PM [noon] POB :Fatehabad [haryana] asc : Virgo with regards and thanks, triptika Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.