Guest guest Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 I will never forget one lecture in which, as often happened, he was attacking a famous impersonalist commentary to the verse, "On Me fix thy mind; to Me be devoted; worship Me; revere Me; thus having disciplined thyself, with Me as thy goal, to Me shalt thou come." (Bg. 9.34) The impersonalist scholar commented: "It is not the personal Krsna to whom we have to give ourselves up utterly, but the unborn, beginningless, eternal who speaks through Krsna." Whenever Srila Prabhupada had Rayarama read this passage at a lecture, he would explode into a furious diatribe. "Just see what a nonsense rascal. Krsna is standing there and says, ‘To Me; worship Me.' And he, a very great scholar, says it is not to the personal Krsna but to some void. Just see what a rascal number one." After listening to this diatribe for about a month, Kirtanananda finally, at the end of a lecture, said, "I don't see where he's actually wrong. Krsna is in all of us. So if we surrender to the unborn within all of us, then we attain the ultimate." And he went on in this way. Srila Prabhupada didn't say a word. Kirtanananda finally ran down, and Srila Prabhupada asked, "Are you finished now?" When Kirtanananda acknowledged that he was, Srila Prabhupada suddenly began to roar like the lion incarnation. "Krsna is standing right before you and He says, ‘You worship Me,' and you mean to say you do not worship Krsna? You mean worship some void, unborn? Krsna is before Arjuna and He says, ‘On Me fix thy mind. To Me be devoted. Worship Me!' You do not understand? A nonsense rascal says it is not to Krsna, so you want to worship such a nonsense rascal? ‘Not to the personal Krsna,' he says, and Krsna says, ‘Worship Me.'" We all sat in shocked silence. Kirtanananda didn't say another word. I remember that I thought this attack very harsh, but Umapati thought it was justified. "He's right," Umapati said afterwards. "None of the commentators mention worshiping Krsna, but Krsna clearly says, ‘Worship Me.' You've read Bhagavad-gita before. Have you ever thought of worshiping Krsna?" I had to admit that although I had read Gita three or four times before, worshiping Krsna had never entered my mind. Later I came to understand that most scholars and swamis avoid the clear command of this verse, although they teach from Bhagavad-gita. Indeed, the following year in San Francisco I bluntly asked one celebrated Swami Mayananda, "Do you worship Krsna?" He was sitting in a chair, and I was standing over him when I asked the question, and he jumped to his feet and shouted, "No! Why should I?" His eyes flashed, and he was furious and he chided me that Krsna is nothing but the Self that is within all of us. Thus Srila Prabhupada's first job was to establish that the supreme aspect of the Absolute Truth is a person and that we are to worship this person. By and large we were mostly impersonalists addicted to inactivity. We were concerned about mukti, nirvana or liberation from all material action, but he deluged us with words and showed us how action for the sake of the Supreme is on the spiritual platform and is superior to inaction. This essentially is the message of Bhagavad-gita, for Lord Krsna tells Arjuna to fight, "but do it for Me." Srila Prabhupada said, "When one works for Krsna and chants His name, he is already liberated and living on the spiritual plane. Just as one feels heat as soon as he touches something hot, one is liberated as soon as he enters into the service of Krsna." We all felt that we had just touched something very hot. Certainly no one doubted that our long slumber had been disturbed. By Hayagriva Prabhu, BTG #47 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.