Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

In case you did not notice: I posted two texts. You commented only on the

less important one.

 

In your last text you have proven that if Srila Prabhupada did not act

according to Krishna's plan, then he would not have been a bona fide

spiritual master. But that was not your claim. So again you have wasted time

proving something that I did not ask you to prove. Your claim was:

 

If it was not Krishna’s plan to have Srila Prabhupada become the sole diksa

guru for ISKCON in 1966, then Srila Prabhupada would not have been a bona

fide spiritual master.

 

I shall now show in two ways that this statement is wrong. First let us look

at the contrapositive (which is equivalent):

 

If Srila Prabhupada was a bona fide spiritual master, then it was Krishna’s

plan to have Srila Prabhupada become the sole diksa guru.

 

So you as a conditioned soul with an imperfect brain claim that you know

Krishna's plan. You must be kidding.

 

Second, your claim must be true for any plan of Krishna not wanting Srila

Prabhupada as the sole diksa guru. Therefore following statement must be

true also:

 

If it was Krishna plan to have multiple diksa gurus for ISKCON in 1966 with

Srila Prabhupada as one of them, then Srila Prabhupada would not have been a

bona fide spiritual master.

 

(Note that the question is not whether this was Krishna's plan or not. The

question is only whether this statement is true or not.)

 

This statement is not true because if it was Krishna's plan to have multiple

diksa gurus for ISKCON in 1966 with Srila Prabhupada as one of them, then in

1966 Srila Prabhupada acted exactly according to this plan: He asked his

godbrothers to help him in ISKCON (certainly not to wash the pots) and he

initiated disciples. There is no reason for not being a bona fide spiritual

master.

 

So you failed to prove that if it was not Krishna’s plan to have Srila

Prabhupada become the sole diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966, then Srila

Prabhupada would not have been a bona fide spiritual master.

 

And what about the proof of your claim that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted

to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON? Will you ever present a complete

proof?

 

ys Ramakanta dasa