Digest Number 2012

[Guest guest]

I feel that this 100% true. Many talk of 'arpanam' to almighty of whatever

one does as one of the methods. Much better than this is the concept that

firm faith in the belief that whatever one does is done by Him. It is more

effective as it does not regnise the existence of individual self. Since it

is extended to others' actions also we cannot find fault with anybody for

any thing. Thus there is no elation or regret on success or failure of

one's own actions nor finding fault with actions of others.

 

podury

..On 27 May 2006 14:48:10 -0000, RamanaMaharshi <

RamanaMaharshi> wrote:

>

>

[Guest guest]

Podury,

Instead of 'whatever one does is done by Him', it could be 'whatever

is happening is done by Him'. This way, the existence of 'one' is

negated. Taking it one step further, if the 'one' is truly negated,

there should not be any 'one' to do even the above analysis or make

observations.

sundar

RamanaMaharshi, "Ramana Sarma Poduri"

<rpodury> wrote:

>

> I feel that this 100% true. Many talk of 'arpanam' to almighty of

whatever one does as one of the methods. Much better than this is

the concept that firm faith in the belief that whatever one does is

done by Him. It is more effective as it does not regnise the

existence of individual self. Since it is extended to others'

actions also we cannot find fault with anybody for any thing. Thus

there is no elation or regret on success or failure of one's own

actions nor finding fault with actions of others.

>

> podury

[Guest guest]

Starting with oneself, according to me, would put the finger on the "culprit" much more. Can one count to two and three without starting with "one"?

 

J. and S. Lartet