Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Sundeeps Chart - Analysis 2 (to Sunil)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Sunil,

My responses to some of your queries. You seem a little apologetic

when you make predictions that are a little off. Please dont be - you

are honest and you are diligently applying the techniques you have

learned - and that's all that matters for your own personal growth as

an astrologer. I learn from my conversations with you (and others)

and as long as thats happening, its all good.

 

 

>

>

>

>

>

> 8.      The logical conclusion since A6 is in 10H, so debt is

connected

> with Profession, but still trying deeper is ur debt connected with

some

> property (a4) or even aspect of 2H planets can give debt hence

family? (

> I do not know how to see this and have not been taught, so just

using

> some wild imagination)

>

>

> I thought I already said that I had huge debt linked to my house.

> SJ: I don't think so u mentioned that ur debt was linked to ur house

> and I crosschecked it in ur mail also which I copy below.

>

 

Oops, sorry my mistake. I had made another post about my house on the

vedic astrology group then. Well, thats an absolutely accurate

prediction to your credit then.

 

 

> The actual times are very well defined. In Venus-Sun I suddenly shot

> into wealth (7 figures, in dollars). In the very next antar, in the

> space of a few months, i.e. in Venus-Moon, I shot the other way,

getting

> a house, financial situation changing and going almost 7 figures in

> debt. That debt has remained and slowly increased through Venus-

Mars.

> Venus-Rahu was mostly ok - several things improved actually,

although

> debt never went away. As Venus-Rahu ends (now), debt payments etc

are

> threatening to overwhelm me very quickly.

>

>

> SJ: I am sorry I couldn't pin it down but then after the event has

> happened it is generally very easy to say that it is well defined,

but

> then to give an event many planets can be involved. No doubt

astrologers

> find it tough to consistently predict marriage time but justify it

> easily after the event has happened which is no excuse for my wrong

> analysis.

>

 

Nothing to be sorry about. I didnt mean to imply that you couldnt pin

it down. I meant that the time of wealth earning was very sudden.

Meaning that in 1999 I had nothing and by mid 2000 I had 7 figures.

Thats what I meant - that it wasnt a slow accumulation over several

antars but a sudden accumulation (exactly and only in Venus-Sun) and

then a sudden loss. So what I am trying to say is that the Vim dasha

(or whatever dasha you choose or even gochar) must show the sudden-

ness. I personally feel that the pileup of planets in my 11th from AL

(AL as Ge, that is) is what did it because while all Sun antars have

been good for me (as Bharatji correctly deduced), there was no money

aspect to the others. But perhaps I'm wrong, I'm open to reasoned

suggestions..

 

 

 

>

>

> U have chara dasha from  June to  Oct End – I feel this could be a

> tough tough period though with ur AK replacement it is tough to

predict

> with surety as KN Rao didn't mention about AK replacement in his

> article.

>

 

Which chara dasha?

 

 

>

>

> 10.  When can this Debt happen – this is tough, now Sat and Moon are

> in2H and the dispositor is Ven who is in Marana Karaka stana and

also in

> 6H of debts, so Ven dasa can give the Debt, antars can be of Rahu

(karma

> stana of 6H) & another possibility is Mars antar as Mars aspect the

2H

> where this combo is placed. Mars is in Kubera (wealth).

>

>

> As I said, I went suddenly and hugely into debt clearly in Venus-

Moon

> (late 2000) - 34th year. Things have slowly increased since then,

so you

> can consider all subsequent years are year of debts. Nothing stands

out

> in the 38th year (2004-2005).

>

>

> SJ: thanks for this valuable feedback I learnt something what I had

> missed out on. Can you let me know the month the debt happened want

to

> cross check it in the chart.

 

Well I guess it would be late Dec 2000 that I officially went into

debt. Then there was another and massive tax related issue in March

2001 which led me to increase the debt again by early April 2001.

There have been other periods later when I have slowly increased the

debt even more, but the above ones are the standout ones. There have

also been 2 times when I reduced it, only to increase again later.

 

 

>

>

>

> 11.  Through another method A - 38th year of ur life can give debts

or

> the year will be called the Year of Debts

>

> 12.   Did the debts happen in Dec of that year – am trying this for

> the first time and have no expertise in this so am testing this.

>

> 13.  S (sa) , R(ra in hindi) or V (va pronounced in hindi) – have

> you been associated with these people or company names significantly

> – again testing technique.

> My wife, mom, sisters, dad all satisfy the above criterion. But not

my

> kids.

>

>

> SJ: Ok, can you indicate the starting Letter (akshara) of ur company

> that u are associated with.

 

Its T (ta in hindi)

 

>

> b)     Or for a woman (Ven is wife) as Sat is on Ven which means

woman

> or Sister (some say Ven as karaka for Sister –read recently).

> My oldest sister since late 2003 had a resurgence of her mental

problem.

> It improved in early 2004, worsened again in July-Aug-Sep 2004, but

then

> was ok from 2005 early until now. Cant really say it is linked to

Saturn

> in Cancer.

>

>

> SJ: It is very easily linked to Sat even in 2003 (which I didn't

> write about with confidence), anyways to each his own technique.

>

 

Ok. So then that technique is good.

 

>

> Thanks for attempting my chart. I have personally seen that

predictions

> of my life are never really on the mark (except Zoran, a long time

ago).

> I feel that is perhaps due to my being Aq lagna, having 6

charakaraka

> replacements (can you say something about this?), and also my Arudha

> Lagna being wrongly calculated. I dont think that my AL is Aries as

> JHora says. Aries with Rahu in it? Doesnt describe what people

think of

> me at all - I am far from being perceived as flamboyant and

aggressive

> as Rahu in Aries seems to suggest. I think that my AL is actually

Gemini

> with Sun & Me in it - this describes what most people think of me -

> analytical and somewhat aloof. Additionally, whatever money I

gained was

> actually in the year 2000, when  all planets were positioned in

Aries in

> March-May 2000. If you take Ge as AL, then this corresponds to all

> planets in 11th from AL, a 35 bindu house. If you take Ar as AL,

then

> this corresponds to all planets in AL. Which is more likely to give

huge

> gains, planets in AL or 11th from AL - I guess the latter, correct?

Even

> more interestingly, later that year when all planets started moving

to

> Ta - 12th from AL (Sa, Ju), I quickly lost everything.

>

>

> SJ:  Though I find it tough to understand that ur AL could be in

Ge, but

> the explanations u have given with practical facts seem to lean

towards

> AL in Ge and convince me.

>

 

The reason I said AL in Ge was if you take Ra as Aq Lord and then

calculate the AL, it turns out to be Ge. In one example Sanjayji has

taken in his Narayana Dasa book (toward the end of the book with the

chart of some person who did a lot of computer work for the SJC, I

think), he does exactly that (he calculates both ALs, the AL-with-Sa-

as-Lord and AL-with-Ra-as-Lord and then takes the stronger AL - same

reasoning applies to my chart too, I think, especially with Me

becoming AK eventually).

 

 

 

> Zoran is a very senior astrologer & infact 3-4 of the techniques

used

> above were of his own research material.  But then am new to that

> technique so I guess.  Haven't u tried Visti Larsen & his Guru

> Sanjay Rath they are very good astrologers.

 

Sorry I didnt mean to say the others are bad, simply that a cursory

analysis of my chart generally hasnt revealed the truth. I dont think

Sanjayji's ever done my chart though. Visti might have, but probably

not with full rectification since he was very busy then..

 

 

Hope you continue this kind of blind analysis with others as well, it

is an excellent and courageous way of learning

 

Sundeep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...