Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Truth or consequences

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Mahanidhi Dasa wrote:

 

Guru-Krsna Dasa wrote:

>> No, it is not highly offensive or slanderous to refer to Vaisnavis who

>> advocate gender equality within ISKCON as "feminists," since the

>> definition of a feminist is "one who advocates the theory of the

>> political, economic, and social equality of the sexes."

 

>In other words, to call a thief a thief is speaking the truth, yes?

 

And to call a belief a belief is speaking the truth, yes :)

 

>It only depends wether it is you who calls someone a thief, or is it

someone >who calls you a thief.

 

Unfortunately, too often "it all depends" on one's *belief*--truth being a

subordinate concern.

 

>So in the case of the former it is "saying the facts", while in the case of

the >later it is a "highly slanderous offence" punishable by Yamaraja.

>Typical.

 

In the case of the former, whoever fits the definition may truthfully be

described as such. And in the case of the latter, whoever is so childishly

slandering those who happen to differ with him on "gender issues" will reap

his just deserts--I also am confident of that, yes.

 

>Curiously, but you are using term "Vaisnavis" when referring to "one who

>advocates... [atheism]".

 

Well, prabhu, I thank you for putting that word in brackets, at least. So

that's now for you to explain or not, as you like. My comment is that

although feminism is a product of an atheistic society, still it's obviously

*not* a synonym for atheism. So you have unnecessarily introduced the word

"atheism" in a discussion not at all about atheism and have also

unecessarily created the oxymoronic concept of a "Vaisnavi who advocates

atheism." Why waste time in this way?

 

>While "one" is of no gender, you got only the females in your divine mind

(as >opposed to "darwinistic mind") to attribute to this trouble making.

 

That you claim (wrongly, by the way) to know my mind is also a little silly,

isn't it, prabhu?

 

>- Mahanidhi das (typical)

 

Perhaps you might consider responding atypically for a change :)

 

--gkd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...