Guest guest Posted July 17, 2000 Report Share Posted July 17, 2000 > Oh please, everyone knows you are one of Kundali's clones. Now, I wonder if you picked this one up from your hat of happy thoughts, or what? I do correspond with him, that is a fact, as I do with dozens of other people. There are lots of people from whom I do learn things. It does not mean I am their clone. It does not mean that I blindly agree with their insights. Most of the people here do not know me. Evidently you are among them. > Kundali thinks he is the only intelligent person around, and as > his clone you agree with him, so what is the value of your > socalled evidence? Kundali is burning with envy every time > something favorable is being said about the GBC, and now you have > become like that, too. Dear conference moderators, if people who write passages such as the above remain in this conference, I am doubtful if we ever get a reasonable, constructive discussion together. He is twisting people's words, then defeating his own twists with great passion. Then he is attempting to assassinate people by ad hominem attacks when he runs out of arguments. I have the evidence. Here is a sample. See his letter to which I comment. See his previous postings in this conference. It is by no means constructive. Destructive. There is no attempt to arrive at a honest conclusion. Rather, there is a strong attempt to refute the opposition without even attempting to honestly establish one's own position. This approach corresponds to the mode of ignorance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2000 Report Share Posted July 17, 2000 At 10:03 +0200 7/17/2000, Jahnu (das) (Almviks Gard - S) wrote: > >Oh please, everyone knows you are one of Kundali's clones. Not me and I know many other people who are very appreciative of Ekatma's reform efforts and his use of his own brain (not anyone else's including Kundali's). Without his work, it is e.g. questionable whether Suhotra Swami would have received the professional help he so clearly needed. Ys, Madhusudani dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2000 Report Share Posted July 18, 2000 Madhusudani wrote: > Not me and I know many other people who are very appreciative > of > Ekatma's reform efforts and his use of his own brain (not > anyone > else's including Kundali's). Without his work, it is e.g. > questionable whether Suhotra Swami would have received the > professional help he so clearly needed. I guess you must have great insight into how Ekatma, and everyone else for that matter, are using their brains. Since you are such a great authority on how to use one's brain maybe you can explain how it is even possible to not use one's own brain. You say, you appreciate Ekatma's use of his own brain. I find that confusing because I thought that everyone, regardless of where they take their inspiration and whom they choose to listen to, was using their own brain. So again, can you explain how it is possible to use another person's brain? Ys, Jahnu das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.