Oh Dear Part 2

[Guest guest]

> I however have no need to take a single paisa

> from the temple for myself. I come from an extremely wealthy family, and

> therefore it is not possible for anyone to keep me in their pocket by

> paying my wages - since I do not need any.

>

> Best wishes

>

> ys, Adri

 

If Adri, as stated above, does not take for himself a single paisa from the

temple, then could he confirm who pays for all his worldwide global air

travels to spread his anti-GBC ritvik concoction? His wealthy family?

 

Who pays for all the worldwide travels of his purohit Mr K Desai?

Adri's wealthy family?

 

Who pays for the trips to India of the co-author of the Faked Final Order,

Yaduraja? Adri's wealthy family?

 

Who pays for Adri's ritvik and legal secretaries and all the other helping

hands? Adri's wealthy family?

 

Who pays for Adri's expensive legal costs in the court case against ISKCON

in Calcutta? Adri's wealthy family?

 

Where did the money come from for the unauthorized ritvik temple in New

York? Adri's wealthy family?

 

And so on, and so on.

 

Will Adri typically evade these questions? Will he try to change the subject

by answering the question with a digression question, or by twisting an

obscure diversion meaning out of what has been asked?

 

Is Adri trying to tell us that not a single paisa for all his above

mentioned illegal expenses on unauthorised ritvik propaganda over the last

4-5 years has come from ISKCON money?

 

All those expenses were paid for by his own 'extremely wealthy family'?

Oh dear!

 

Will Adri typically retort that spending vast amounts of hard-earned ISKCON

money on spreading an unauthorised anti-guru/GBC ritvik concoction -- to

save ISKCON -- is not mispending Srila Prabhupada's money? It's for the

mission?

 

Adri can't follow Srila Prabhupada's final instruction to CO-OPERATE with

the GBC, he can't stay away from arguing and controversy, he can't stop

criticizing genuine ISKCON sadhus, he can't obey Srila Prabhupada's implicit

instruction not to take philosophical issues to a mundane court, he can't do

so many things and yet he declares he is the saviour of ISKCON and that

everyone should follow him!!

 

We all agree ISKCON needs reform, but Adri's deliquent reform so far has

only brought about DEFORM in the lives of many thousands of devotees, and

DEFORM to ISKCON's reputation.

 

Adri stated "I however have no need to take a single paisa

from the temple for myself."

 

If Adri has spent no ISKCON money on the unauthorised ritvik propaganda then

what he says is true. Great! His wealthy family has footed the bill.

 

But if his own 'vast wealth' remains untouched and he has spent a vast

fortune of ISKCON's money on unauthorised propaganda then what he has stated

is not only false and cunningly misleading but is a case of stealing from

ISKCON.

 

Afterall, the whole ritvik idea is merely Ardi's own personal view, not an

authorised ISKCON project.

 

So where is Adri's illegal ritvik propaganda money coming from?

 

>From his 'wealthy family' or from hard-earned ISKCON money?

 

ys

 

ada