Guest guest Posted July 24, 2000 Report Share Posted July 24, 2000 Dear Prabhus, Pamho. AgtSP and His pure followers! Answering your comment, I am wondering, if the authority under the GBC is not following strictly why he should not be removed by that 'ultimate managing authority': the GBC, and by all means not stay in position to rape or abuse others. Isn't this common sense? If the GBC do not take seriously the complaints offered by ladies and children, they are guilty of not giving endangered persons proper assistance and as such they are party of the crime: 'co-respondent'. A watch dog is not only barking; He is jumping on the thief or the criminal. We desperately need these kind of 'Spiritual Warrior' in Iskcon.Ys, KKdd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2000 Report Share Posted July 24, 2000 > > > we can not > > > have somone in responsible position but not listen to him, do whatever > > > we want and then when things go wrong blame that authority. > > There seems to be a contradiction here. If the "authority" is not > followed, it seems that s/he was not an authority to begin with. Same > thing in the business world. If you have a company run by a CEO who can't > get anyone to follow his/her orders, the share holders would consider that > person an ineffective manager and get rid of him/her right away. > > A manager has to be able to manage. Otherwise what's the point of that > office? > > Ys, > Madhusudani dasi Thank you mataji Madhusudani Radha on your always sensible and logical explenation.It's a pity that we dont have more people like your self in our ISKCON organization. Y.s. Janaka das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2000 Report Share Posted July 25, 2000 Who did you have in mind regarding "rape and abuse?" I can't recall any present or former GBC accused of sexual acts that one might characterize as rape except Kirtanananda and he was expelled about ten years back. Did I miss something? Krsna.Kirtana.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT) net [Krsna.Kirtana.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT) net] Monday, July 24, 2000 2:34 AM Bhadra Balaram (das) JPS (Mayapur - IN); India (Continental Committee) Open (Forum); Varnasrama development GBC authority and responsibility Dear Prabhus, Pamho. AgtSP and His pure followers! Answering your comment, I am wondering, if the authority under the GBC is not following strictly why he should not be removed by that 'ultimate managing authority': the GBC, and by all means not stay in position to rape or abuse others. Isn't this common sense? If the GBC do not take seriously the complaints offered by ladies and children, they are guilty of not giving endangered persons proper assistance and as such they are party of the crime: 'co-respondent'. A watch dog is not only barking; He is jumping on the thief or the criminal. We desperately need these kind of 'Spiritual Warrior' in Iskcon.Ys, KKdd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.