Report from Calcutta

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhagavat Dharma

 

I note that you once again completely avoid answering my three points (what

to speak of the nine previous) and instead act in the most hypocritical

manner possible by quoting from Puranjana! How does repeating Puranjana's

speculations have any bearing on the three points I raised, and which you

continually evade? When have you ever before quoted onto com Puranjana's

writings as having any relevance to anything? Why suddenly now do you quote

Puranjana? Clearly you are unable to answer the following points since you

know they are true, and so instead you act in the most slippery manner

possible by quoting someone who you utterly condemn. Just to remind

everyone, these are the three points you tried to evade by posting

Puranjana's irrelevancies:

 

1) You have not confirmed that you chant 16 rounds every day, thus

indicating that you are not yourself following Bhakta Rupa's advise (or

Srila Prabhupada's) on the issue of taking shelter of the holy name, inspite

of admonishing me for the same. This makes you a hypocrite, and proves you

are not even practising Bhakti Yoga. If you do eventually answer please tell

the truth since to lie to all the devotees will be very bad for your

spiritual life and Sri Krishna will certainly expose you further.

 

2) You also refuse to address the obvious point that you have a history of

simply parroting whatever will ensure keeps your wages rolling in , and

being a paid defender of regimes that have been proven over time to be

corrupt and wrong - the zonal acharya system, Harikesa etc. etc. Therefore

this is another reason why what you say has no value. You are clearly not

thinking for yourself but simply reading from whatever script you are

provided by your deviant and rascally employers.

 

3) Finally your argument about the GBC is redundant because again you avoid

a simple basic point. Yes Srila Prabhupada set up a GBC. But he also told us

what the GBC was. He defined it in legally binding resolutions. Obviously if

the GBC tomorrow said 'Krishna wasn't God', they would cease to be the GBC,

and we would not need to follow them. The GBC are not a law unto themselves

- they are bound by Srila Prabhupada's instructions - and in this way there

is a check and balance to make sure they do not deviate. Srila Prabhupada

has made this very clear when he set up and defined the GBC. I quote:

 

"Resolved: The GBC (Governing Body Commission) has been established by His

Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada to represent Him in

carrying out the responsibility of managing the International Society for

Krishna Consciousness of which He is the Founder-Acarya and supreme

authority. The GBC accepts as its life and soul His divine instructions and

recognises that it is completely dependent on His mercy in all respects. The

GBC has no other function or purpose other than to execute the instructions

so kindly given by His Divine Grace and preserve and spread His Teachings to

the world in their pure form." (Definition of GBC, Resolution 1, GBC minutes

1975)

 

It clearly states that the GBC has "no other function or purpose other than

to execute the instructions so kindly given by His Divine Grace". I think

you would agree that if the GBC did not do this, then they would no longer

be the GBC - saying that Krishna was not God would be once such example of

not 'executing the instructions' of Srila Prabhupada who has repeatedly

made it clear that Krishna IS God. Similarly the July 9th directive was

another instruction given by His Divine Grace which the GBC have not

executed, thereby dis-enfranchising themselves. This is a very simple point,

yet you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge its validity.

 

Your desire to continually avoid every point which is made, and to instead

post the irrelevant rantings of Puranjana, who you condemn, merely

confirms these 3 points:

 

a) That you are NOT chanting 16 rounds every day.

b) That you are just parroting whatever will keep your wages intact.

c) That you know that the GBC have lost their authorisation to be the GBC by

having *not* executed the instruction of July 9th.

 

Every time you post something that does not address these points I shall

simply keep repeating them. The days for such hypocrisy and slipperiness are

well over, people like yourself are being exposed daily for what you are.

 

ys Adri