Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Disintegeration of our Society by internal fighting

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

We all agree something has to be done. But what to do? that is the question!

 

Adri is not going to listen to anyone and stop. Mayapur cannot keep quiet.

It has to defend ISKCON.

 

Now a kolkatta devotee says in the media that Mayapur is wanting its

properties. What nonsense! Just shows kolkatta doesn't consider itself part

of ISKCON. Adri thinks kolkatta centre is his private property.

 

Maybe the medical reports will clear everything. It beats me why a man

should kill himself if he is confident of being innocent. His suicide proves

that he is guilty.

 

Why can't someone interview the lady who made the rape complaint and give

it to the press? It could keep kolkatta quiet for some time. The initial

report said that when the lady went to collect her pension, she went along

with her son. Does the son not have anything to say?

 

Could we also know from ISKCON's legal team what is happening with the rtvik

case filed in court by Adri and Madhu? Why do we not get prior information

of all these things that happen from temple leaders. We get to know only

after it comes out in the papers.

 

And, what happened to the Communications office for India?

 

 

Ys

 

Sumithra krishna das

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 21:18 +0500 8/7/2000, Vijaya-venugopala (das) JPS (Persian Gulf) wrote:

>This is not really internal fighting. The ritviks (there are just two of

>them, as far as I can see) are EXTERNAL enemies of Iskcon, who need to be

>summarily expelled.

 

We can't have it both ways. If they need to be *expelled*, they must

be on the inside now. If they were truly "external", no expulsions

would be necessary. Personally, I think the fact that Adri and

Madhu Pandit were initiated as Prabhupada's disciple and

granddisciple, respectively, and both hold positions in ISKCON

definitely makes them insiders. You may disagree with their

actions, but what are your grounds for saying they're "external"?

 

Between the Calcutta lawsuit, the gurukula lawsuit, and this recent

case, I definitely agree with Nayana-ranjana prabhu that there is

cause for concern. The question is, what should we do? I keep hearing

calls for reforms, but have seen little in terms of practical steps

in that direction.

 

Ys,

Madhusudani dasi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...