Guest guest Posted September 6, 2000 Report Share Posted September 6, 2000 > > I > > just happened not to like the way you were trying to win your argument > > over; ask a provocative question and then when she get's upset sensing a > > humiliation behind, then immediately > > proclaim to everybody how mataji goes paranoid, got no quality > > answer to offer, got compared with condemned ritviks, exposed > > as foolish proposer of replacement but who, just see, can't even > > give even one name, and then eliminate her away with "mataji let's not > > get in arguments". All OK, but I would like men and women to follow the same rules in a discussion. I have to make allowance for Krishna Kirtan prabhu's letting her emotions go full rip because - yes - it is acceptable for a woman to be like that. It is not really a fault in a woman. If BB expressed himself in that way, it would not be appropriate, and we would shut him up straightaway! Your indication of some sexism in BB's dealing with Krishna Kirtan dd is probably quite the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2000 Report Share Posted September 11, 2000 At 06:14 PM 9/6/00 +0100, Antardwip (das) JPS (UK) wrote: >All OK, but I would like men and women to follow the same rules in a >discussion. I have to make allowance for Krishna Kirtan prabhu's letting her >emotions go full rip because ????? According to what etiquette book? Accepting different ways of expression from a woman is not polite - it's patronizing. As if we don't have control of our speech. >If BB expressed himself in that >way, it would not be appropriate, and we would shut him up straightaway! Says who? Ys, Madhusudani dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.