Some unsolicited advice.

[Guest guest]

Srirama (das) ACBSP wrote:-

 

> On these public conferences, we often read texts which offend our

> personal sensibilities, not so much because of what they contain, but

> rather from the tone or presentation. I often get the impression that the

> content of the message is not understood or appreciated by its readers

> because it gets lost in the emotional delivery.

 

Absolutely true

 

I also do not understand why one has to loose his nerve. Reply to

the point and be firm while keeping the subject unchanged.

 

It is obvious, many may think that he is right and others have ill motive

but is that all true? It becomes a guessing game.

 

By calling names what good is going to be achieved rather it is going to

agitate the minds of many readers.

 

To me it appears that if it is difficult to convience few of the inquistive

devotees with their quieries (even if they are considered foolish) than how

much difficult it is for GBC or whosoever takes up those postions to

convience the masses.

 

Everyone likes a change. According to Srila Prabhupada this is also a

diseased condition of material life. It is most difficult to find a perfect

situation in the life save and except for real devotional service.

 

Devotees are claiming that they are trying to serve Srila Prabhupada if so

then where is the question of fighting and if they are fighting then where

is the question of serving Srila Prabhupda.

 

 

> Essentially, the method is

> to carefully reread the letter after writing and remove anything that

> sounds angry, pejorative, insulting, condescending, or that could be

> interpreted as a personal attack. The end result is a message that sounds

> cool-headed, reasonable and professional.

 

It is a very good advice for all. Thank you prahu.

 

 

yhs, vmd