Guest guest Posted April 4, 2004 Report Share Posted April 4, 2004 > > ear Members > > I thought also arial photography had revealed the submerged bridge > > between South India and Sri Lanka . > > YSYS > > nasa photos do explain this connection, and the indian media gobble(s) > (and most devotees too) 'd it up. It could have just been part of the Indian land mass that got disconnected by rising water. (A seculation on my part.) > Syamsundara's explanation is > interesting. Yet all the tirtha's mentioned in the south that have to do > with Rama i.e Dhanuskoti (where the bridge was broken by Rama's bow), > would have to be refiguered. > > of course Ram traveling all over India, the tirtha's remain as they are. > > TridaNDi BhikSu, Bhakti Visrambha MAdhava It would not be the first time that what was supposed to be a holy spot turned out not to be the actual place. For how many centuries did people consider Navadvip to be the actual appearance place of Lord Caitanya until Bhaktivinode Thakura found the real place? That really upset a lot of people didn't it? How many pastimes had to now be shifted from Navadvip to the Yogapitha? Isn'y it true that there are still some in Navadvip who insist that Lord Caitanya appeared there and not teh Yogapitha. Shyama Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.