Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 > > It is not a 'slice of siddhanta', it is a directive from the founder of an institution to the officers of said institution. It is really a legal > matter, there never was any real philosophical objection to running the > system. > Well, I guess that is how you see it. > > Oh, come on now. There are eternal principles, and then there are > > instructions according to time and place. This is basic stuff. > > Right, so how does Srila Prabhupada's continued diksa status violate the eternal principles? Please be specific. You know Ajamila was right, this really does go on and on. There is practically no precedence in our tradition to support the rtvik party interpration of this supposed order of ongoing wholesale rtivik initiation. Nor did Prabhupada offer clear evidence that was his desire, as suggested by the Rtvik proposal. > Would you concede that the identical > instruction need not be found in history order to agree to follow the order of the guru? > The bona-fide representive of the disciplic succession preaches according to the tradition of guru/sadhu and sastra. Suddenly, now it is suggested that Prabhupada changed his successful preaching strategy based on a suggested intretation of a two paragraph letter dictated by a disciple. > > Yes and we have answered all those questions. Please see all our papers > on the IRG web site. (www.irg.zetnet.co.uk) > I'm already seeing the answers here as well. I am sure the same good job continues on at the web site. > > We may be debating your most learned pandit on Chakra soon, so you can still have some fun. > > If you are nicely engaged in devotional service, that how could I feel anything but happy for you? ys, Sthita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.