All q's answered- but from Adri's side nothing answered

[Guest guest]

Dear Adri Pr., Dear GBC followers.,

All glories to the Prabhupada-anugas. AGTSP.

SthitaPrabhu is giving you like anything. The only way for you is to come

with such excusses.

You are getting pierced by the strong arguments of GBC followers.

 

> > How can you say there is no precedent if you do not compare like with

> > like? You never found all those previous examples of ISKCON type

> > institutions going back into the dawn of time did you?

 

So what do you mean. It is somewhere said that a regular parampara is only

valid in certain conditions. You can see in the purports, when the regular

parampara breaks krsna has to send somebody or come himself. This was the

reason Krsna spoke Bhagavad gita.

What means like to like?

The regular parampara system is not obsolete if you wanted to say this.

 

>> And even if you did manage to uncover a series of identical situations

>>to ISKCON in previous Kali Yugas, and even if the same identical system

>>was not employed, that would still mean nothing in itself since acaryas

>>can set their own precedents.

 

The acaryas can set their own precendents but this doesn't mean that he will

go against the scriptural injunctions. Or do a completely new thing.

 

SP Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 4: Chapter Sixteen, Text 1

 

PURPORT

A bona fide spiritual master does not mention anything not mentioned in the

authorized scriptures. Ordinary people have to follow the instructions of

sadhu, sastra and guru. Those statements made in the sastras and those made

by the bona fide sadhu or guru cannot differ from one another.

 

SP SB lecture in LA 1972:

 

Through the parampara system. Krsna said this, and then Brahma said the same

thing, then Narada said the same thing, Vyasadeva said the same thing, and

then disciplic succession, Madhvacarya, Madhavendra Puri, Isvara Puri, Lord

Caitanya, Sad-gosvami, Krsnadasa Kaviraja Gosvami, Srinivasa Acarya,

Narottama dasa Thakura, Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura. In this way.

Jagannatha dasa babaji, Gaura Kisora dasa babaji, Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati.

Then we are speaking. The same thing. Not that "Because we are modernized

.... Your modern science has changed." Nothing has changed.

 

Nothing has changed.

Since ISKCON is a modern institution it doesn't mean that the vedic

instructions are obsolate. The vedas are eternal.

Since nothing has changed where is the big change the Rtvikism.

 

Srila Prabhupada said that everything he explained in the books, where the

siddhantic instructions, you are only saying maybe it is like this, like

that, actually Srila Prabhupada means like this, that.

 

> >This has been explained to you now for the last

> > time, so you need not worry it will go on and on.

> >

> > ys Adri & Madhu

 

It was explained? For the last time. But nothing is clear, since 99% of

Srila Prabhupada's statements doesn't support Krishnakant-anugas.

 

Will go on and on. You mean same arguments those who are refuted by Sthita,

Ajamila, Bhasu Ghosh Prabhus and other GBC followers you want to bring up as

the siddhanta again and again. This is not very inteligent.

 

 

Please read again the point by point refutation of The Final Order written

by Jahnu Prabhu, we heard you are beliwing that Krsna-kant has refuted it

and so you don't read it. Can you show your refutation. Or you cannot show

up anything?

 

The GBC followers humble servant

Damana Krsna das Br.