Ajamila gets haunted by his own statements

[Guest guest]

Dear Ajamila Prabhu, Please accept my humble obeisances. All Glories to

Srila Prabhupada.

 

> > "From the absolute perspective physical contact is not

> > required, we need only to "follow the process" to get back to

> > Godhead. Diksa initiation formalises our connection with the

> > parampara. But that formality alone will not get us back to

> > Godhead. Only by following the process of chanting Hare

> > Krishna offenselessly will one get back to Godhead."

> > (His Grace Ajamila Dasa Adhikari, 22/5/99, Text COM:2336806)

>

> I stand by my words again derived from Srila Prabhupada's books.

> Again, not even a hint of ritvikism there. Formalising one's

> link with the parampara is a must, but that alone cannot get one

> back to Godhead. This is what any "philosophicaly healthy"

> Vaisnava would have understood from my text.

 

It is interesting to note that you have not actually been able to ANSWER any

of the points - only respond with your usual insults ('I am dreaming' etc.).

And that is not surprising since even in the one and only line here that you

have made an attempt to actually deal with the CONTENT of what you said

you contradict yourself.

 

You said:

 

"From the absolute perspective physical contact is not required, we need

only to "follow the process" to get back to Godhead."

 

Then you said:

 

"Formalising one's link with the parampara is a must, but that alone cannot

get one back to Godhead."

 

How can something simultaneously be both 'not required' and 'a must'?

 

You have definitely trapped yourself here just as the GBC have with these

resolutions. And don't forget, you will be forever trapped, and stuck in the

ritvik camp, since you have also just said "I stand by my words again

derived from Srila Prabhupada's books" Since you have said that these

statements are derived from Srila Prabhupada's books, they are obviously

applicable to all the followers of ISKCON for the next 10,000 years, since

they come from the 'lawbooks'.

 

> Are you not Kali's disciple? Nay, sorry for the offense.

> Disciple of his disciple, Desai.

 

I see the pressure of this paper has obviously got to you, since you have

already backed down from stating that I am disciple of kali, and downgraded

it to being someone else's disciple. With more pressure, your downgrading

may continue, and I may end up again as a devotee!

 

You are going to have to face up to the fact that these statements of yours

are going to haunt you for years to come.

 

By saying that:

 

1) Physical contact is NOT required;

 

2) and Srila Prabhupada gives us all the divya jnana for the next 10,000

years;

 

YOU are responsible for having given everyone a perfect RECIPE for accepting

ritvik, and rejecting the current guru system. If Srila Prabhuada alone is

giving us everything, and 'physical contact is NOT required', then obviously

there is no absolute requirement for the current gurus in ISKCON, and the

ritviks are right since Srila Prabhupada alone can take us back to godhead,

since he gives us all the divya-jnana we need. Thank you very much Ajamila

prabhu. We will be presenting these two statements from you as our tools to

convince everyone. Just these two statements from you are enough to convince

anyone of the case for ritvik. Yes you are potent - though not in the way

you thought! Ajamila prabhu ki jai!

 

And they have picked YOU for the debate. That will be great - but how can it

be a 'debate' when you already agree with us!

 

It will interesting to note if you can respond to these points with anymore

that the usual insults of 'nonsense, concoction, dreaming' etc., and whether

or not you can actually answer these points head on.

 

Ys, Adri