Interpretation is at the heart of the ritvik controversy.

[Guest guest]

> Unfortunately it is probably too late to reach a compromise

> with our Ritvik friends, especially as they are so much

> influenced by this imposter KK Desai.

>

> Ys TS

 

The main imposter is a devotee named Yaduraja, who is the main

author of the 'faked' final order. He lives here right next to

the Manor and is allowed to move freely in ISKCON as if nothing

happened. In my opinion, and I have no hesitation whatsoever in

saying it, he is a big black snake. His continued association

with ISKCON, given his being the architect of a paper that is

now costing ISKCON a fortune of sacred money in legal battles,

is now being brought to the attention of the International

ISKCON Ministry Justice. Soft on Ritviks now means ISKCON wastes

huges sums of sacred money, time, and energy repairing their

destruction later.

 

Desai, Yaduraja, Kamsahanta, Nityananda, Adri, and Madhu Pandit

are all possessed by Kali. The only way Kali can break ISKCON is

from within. He gets into the bodies of such unsound devotees

like the Ritviks, and poison concocters and causes chaos. The

ONLY way forward is to clean ISKCON's woodwork from these

corrupt devotees. We cannot be sentimental with them. ALL

Ritviks and poison theory spreaders must be driven far away from

Srila Prabhupada's ISKCON NOW.

 

Hope you are well. Hare Krishna!!!

 

ys

 

ada

[Guest guest]

>[Text 2630169 from COM]

>

>> I believe that this was situation that Srila Prabhupada faced before he

>> departed, that there was no one of his disciples or Godbrothers who was

>> without some tinge of personal desire, therefore he didn't select any one

>> person as Acarya, but left us, in essence, an Acarya Board (ie the GBC).

>

>Maybe Prabhupada established the GBC because he simply wanted to follow in

>the footsteps of his Guru Maharaj who had done the same thing.

 

 

 

Yes, Bhaktisiddhanta also didn't officially 'select' an acarya for the

Guadiya Math, though in retrospect we would quickly make the case the

Prabhupada proved to be quite qualified as a representative of our

disciplic succession. I am not certain that according to Vaisnava

ettiquette that it is appropriate for godbrothers to be expected to take

siksa for another godbrother by leglislative decree.

[Guest guest]

>

> >

> >When Satvarupa Maharaja asked Srila Prabhupada how initiations would be

> >conducted after his dissapearence Srila Prabhupada responded that I will

> >appoint some of you as "officiating acarayas". Did Prabhupada not know

> >what he was saying? I believe he did want his disciples to be officiating

> >gurus not the full fledged type that are mostly discribed in our

> >literature.

> >

> >So in a sense he did want us to be Ritviks, but on behalf of who? Not on

> >behalf of Srila Prabhupada as the Ritviks wrongly assume, but on behalf

> >of the "Acarya Board" the GBC. This year the GBC in their meeting in

> >Mayapur, without using the words that I have used here, have said basicly

> >the same thing.

> >

>

>

> It seems the guru represents the disciplic succesion, working within

> ISKCON in cooperation with the GBC.

>

> I would propose the Prabhupada wanted his followers to be full-fledged,

> but didn't appoint them as such. They will show their qualifications by

> their activities and character.

>

> ys,

>

> Sthita

 

I agree with "the Muni". Point well made.

 

VaiŠava d€sanud€s,

 

B€su Ghosh D€s