Guest guest Posted October 7, 1999 Report Share Posted October 7, 1999 >So, if this is what Adri did, then in this instance, it is true that from >Radhapada's perspective he was the only donor, but from Adri's perspective, >applying the logic of Adri-ology, Radhapada WAS NOT THE ONLY DONOR! maybe Adridharan das found here soemthing to put on the internet! Yes, don't be surprised if he picks up your above words "Radhapada WAS NOT THE ONLY DONOR!" and carries around to show to people saying "look, dayaram also finally confessed that Radhapada WAS NOT THE ONLY DONOR!". He can easily hide the other part of of your sentence. This is their normal practice. ys, bb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.