Guest guest Posted November 13, 1999 Report Share Posted November 13, 1999 > > If I am understanding correctly, no "preferential treatment of male > > devotees in any form" means "equal treatment of male and female > > devotees," or in other words, "equal rights." But Srila Prabhupada had > > the following (and much more of the same) to say about equal rights: > > Puleease!!! That is one big piece of word jugglery. What Bir Krishna > Maharaja said was clear enough: > > >The GBC will not tolerate...preferential treatment given > >to male devotees in any form. > > You read too many things into it. You go off on a tangent and say this > sounds like equal rights, and promptly provide us with Vedabase quotes (as > if we didn't have access to the Vedabase) to try to prove there should be > no equal rights. > > Meanwhile, the GBC say they will not tolerate preferential treatment given > to male devotees in any form. Period. Equal rights or not - that is > another issue for now - preferential treatment is the issue. What if an Iskcon TP's wife serves him prasadam before she takes any herself, will Vipramukhya Maharaja and the EC issue a directive condemning him for accepting such "preferential treatment"??? Ys TS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.