OBSERVATIONS ON THE VRINDAVANA ISSUE

[Guest guest]

>Of all the texts that I read on this topic till now, this is the only one

that convinces me of its credibility.>

 

Really? Including Vipramukhya Maharaja's?

 

I thought it was odd that Nayana-ranjana prabhu first said that he wtched the

events, and later in his text said that "This is what I was told by Vaisnava

prabhu." Which one was it?

 

Also, in his text, he admits that "the devotees in the human

chain got upset and pushed & shoved back"

 

but also that there was no "manhandling".

 

I find it shocking that anyone pushed anyone else away from the deities in

front of both the deities and Srila Prabhupada. If that's not "manhandling" I

don't know what is.

 

The whole thing is just sad. I hope they'll take Braja Bihari Prabhu's

excellent advice and sit down with a skilled facilitator for some mediation,

before this turns into another "ritvik" or "Narayan Maharaja" style conflict.

 

Ys,

Madhusudani dasi