Guest guest Posted November 21, 1999 Report Share Posted November 21, 1999 > > Lola dd replied: > > >Do you really think that a devotee lovingly serving prasad to a family > > >member, male or female, is the same as being forcibly barred from being > > >near the Deity. The wife's service would be voluntary, not forced. I > > I wrote: > > This is the point. The question raised by Trivikram Swami is a > > *non-sequitur*, using cunning logic to distract us from the real issue > > at hand. It is not addressing the issue honestly, like any gentleman > > would. > > First of all, I want to offer my sincere apologies to HH Trvikrama Swami > and beg his forgiveness from him and all the receivers of my previous > post, I was being unfairly harsh on the Maharaja and accusing him of sins > he was not guilty of. Since his posts followed after from Guru Krsna > Prabhu, who does seem to make a business of furthering his arguments by > such "cunning logic," I unfortunately lumped the Maharaja in as well. > This is the problem of criticizing, it can lead one to criticize a great > soul. I am sincerely regretful for this disrespect to the Maharaja, and I > will make all efforts to restrain myself in the future. I didn't feel any offense Srila Prabhu, but I will say that I don't like the way you are appologizing to me and insulting Guru Krsna Prabhu in the same breath. I read his posting on this subject, please enlighten us in which place you have perceived his us of "cunning logic". Ys TS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.