Guest guest Posted November 23, 1999 Report Share Posted November 23, 1999 > > > Nice analogy, if the terms are all unrelated. > > > Ok, now back to the topic under discussion. Prove that it can be > > > applied to show how "a sincere Vaishnava on the path of transcendental > > > knowledge" is not mutually exclusive (as you claim) with "so-called > > > education of the demoniac society." > > > > Certainly. For instance, there is no example of computer useage in > > traditional literature. Computers are the product of "demoniac" > > society, and the education of how to use them is "so -called > > education". It is not directly Vaisnava literature. Yet we can see > > that Vaisnavas are using computers, and availing themselves of that > > education. so it follow that > they > > are not mutually exclusive. > > This is such an important point. If it our BBT devotees had not been > willing to learn computer processing from the non-devotees, it is doubtful > that most of us could ever have read Srila Prabhupada's books. Mataji, I agree that mundane education has value when applied in higher service. But our argument was on something else: that Vaisnavas have nothing to do with mundane education pursued for the sake of sense gratification. That was the definition (courtesy Mahananda Prabhu) posted: "approaching unqualified and sinful men for some scientific knowledge for sense gratification". Didn't Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur say that the quest for higher material education (for sense gratification) is the biggest impediment to spiritual advancement, worse than sex desire? Your servant, Goloka Candra dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.